Mergers, accountants, and economic efficiency

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE
Autori/Curatori Geoff Meeks, J. Gay Meeks
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 16 P. 121-136 Dimensione file 59 KB
DOI 10.3280/POLI2014-001007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This paper explores some consequences for economic efficiency of creative accounting practices by merging companies. It assumes semi-strong information efficiency in the markets for capital and for corporate control; and/or the use of executive contracts relating pay to accounting profit. Ahead of takeover, prospective acquirers can flatter their earnings record in order to secure the support of investors for stock-for-stock deals. During takeover, accounting devices have been used to fill "cookie jars" ready to inflate earnings in the years after merger. After takeover, newly appointed managers can take a "big bath", at the expense of their predecessors’ record, enhancing their own apparent performance. The consequences for economic efficiency can include: allocating control of a business to an inferior management team; cheating stockholders by distorting market prices; undermining markets as «dishonest dealings drive honest dealings out of the market » (Akerlof, 1970); creating incentives to undertake mergers which will not boost underlying profitability; and inhibiting the monitoring and control of agents by principals. The paper helps to explain the finding that the typical merger does not enhance operating performance, as shown for example in Ravenscraft and Scherer’s classic study.;

Keywords:Fusioni, gestione guadagni, contabilità creativa, ente

Jel codes:L25

  1. Mulford C., Comiskey E. 2011. Creative accounting and accounting scandals in the USA, in Jones M. (ed.) Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals. Wiley: Chichester.
  2. Olympus Corporation. 2011. The Third Party Committee, Investigation Report, published online.
  3. Paterson R. 1988. Fair value accounting following an acquisition, in Tonkin D., Skerratt L. (eds.) Financial Reporting, 1990-91: A survey of UK Reporting Practice. ICAEW: London.
  4. Mulford C., Comiskey E. 2005. The Financial Numbers Game. Wiley: Chichester.
  5. Moehrle S. 2002. Do firms use restructuring charge reversals to meet earnings targets?. The Accounting Review, 77 (2): 397-413, DOI: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.397
  6. Meeks G., Meeks J.G. 1981. Profitability measures as indicators of post-merger efficiency. Journal of Industrial Economics, 29 (4): 335-344, DOI: 10.2307/2098249
  7. Meeks G., Whittington G. 1975. Directors’ pay, growth and profitability. Journal of Industrial Economics, 24 (1): 1-14, DOI: 10.2307/2098094
  8. Meeks G. 1977. Disappointing Marriage: A Study of the Gains from Merger. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK).
  9. Lys T., Vincent L. 1995. An analysis of value destruction in AT&T’s acquisition of NCR. Journal of Financial Economics, 39 (2): 353-378, DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00831-X
  10. Kim Y., Park M. 2005. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 40 (2): 435-463, DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000002374
  11. Keynes J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. Macmillan: London.
  12. Jones M. (ed.) 2011. Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals. Wiley: Chichester.
  13. Jensen M., Murphy K. 1990. Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 226-264, DOI: 10.1086/261677
  14. Injejiklan R. 1999. Performance evaluation and compensation research. Accounting Horizons, 13: 147-157, DOI: 10.2308/acch.1999.13.2.147
  15. IASB (International Accounting Standards Board). 2005. Impairment of Assets. International Accounting Standard 36. IASB: London.
  16. Healy P. 1985. The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting variables. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1-3): 85-107, DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
  17. Fama E. 1970. Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25 (2): 383-417, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
  18. Erikson M., Wang S. 1999. Earnings management by acquiring firms in stock for stock mergers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27 (2): 149-176, DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00008-7
  19. Connon H. 1993. Sweet deals may turn sour. The Independent, April 1.
  20. Cheng Q., Warfield T. 2005. Equity incentives and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80 (2): 441-476, DOI: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.441
  21. Botsari A., Meeks G. 2008. Do acquirers manage earnings ahead of a takeover bid?. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35 (5-6): 633-670, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02091.x
  22. Beaver W. 1998. Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
  23. Ayres C. 2002. $845m bonanza for Enron team. The Times, June 18.
  24. Ayers B., Jiang J., Yeung E. 2006. Discretionary accruals and earnings management: an analysis of pseudo earnings targets. The Accounting Review, 81 (3): 617-652, DOI: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.617
  25. Amel-Zadeh A., Lev B., Meeks G. 2013. The benefits and costs of managerial earnings forecasts in mergers and acquisitions. SSRN Working Papers 2198958.
  26. Agrawal A., Jaffe J., Mandelker G. 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: a re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance, 47 (2): 1605-1621, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x
  27. Akerlof G. 1970. The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3): 488-500, DOI: 10.2307/1879431
  28. Perry S., Williams T. 1994. Earnings management preceding management buyout. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18 (2): 157-179, DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)00362-9
  29. Rangan S. 1998. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50 (1): 101-122, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00033-6
  30. Ravenscraft D.J., Scherer F.M. 1987. Mergers, Sell-Offs and Economic Efficiency. Brookings: Washington.
  31. Roosenboom P., Goot T., Mertens G. 2003. Earnings management and initial public offerings: evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38 (3): 243-266.
  32. Saleh N., Ahmed K. 2005. Earnings management of distressed firms during debt renegotiation. Accounting and Business Research, 35 (1): 69-86, DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2005.9729663
  33. Scherer F.M., Beckenstein A., Kaufer E., Murphy R. 1975. The Economics of Multi-Plant Operation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge (Mass.).
  34. Schilit H.M., Perler J. 2010. Financial Shenanigans. McGraw Hill: New York.
  35. SEC. 2002a. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Xerox Corporation, published online.
  36. SEC. 2002b. Xerox settles SEC enforcement action charging company with fraud, published online.
  37. Sherman H., Young S.D., Collingwood H. 2003. Profits You Can Trust. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
  38. Shiller R. 1989. Market Volatility. MIT Press: Cambridge (Mass.).
  39. Shiller R. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
  40. Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. 2003. Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 70 (3): 295-311, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00211-3
  41. Singh A. 1971. Takeovers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK).
  42. Smith T. 1992. Accounting for Growth. Century Business: London.
  43. Smith T. 1996. Accounting For Growth. Century Business: London.
  44. Stock Exchange. 1986/1987-1992/1993. Stock Exchange Official Yearbook. Macmillan: London.
  45. Sweeney P. 1994. Debt covenant violations and managers’ accounting response. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17 (3): 281-308, DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2
  46. Teoh S., Welch I., Wong T. 1998. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Finance, 53 (6): 1935-1974, DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00079
  47. Times Books. 1991. The Times 1000, 1991-1992. Times Books: London.
  48. Watts R., Zimmerman J. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
  49. Whittington G. 2008. Fair value and the IASB/FASB conceptual framework project: an alternative view. ABACUS, 44 (2): 139-168, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00255.x

  • Historical perspectives on accounting for M&A Amir Amel-Zadeh, Geoff Meeks, J. Gay. Meeks, in Accounting and Business Research /2016 pp.501
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2016.1182703
  • Acquirers’ earnings management ahead of stock-for-stock bids in ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ markets Antonia Botsari, Geoff Meeks, in Journal of Accounting and Public Policy /2018 pp.355
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.09.007
  • History, statistics and theory: Frederic M. Scherer and modern industrial organization Giovanni B. Ramello, Francesco Silva, in ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE 1/2014 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-001001
  • Historical Perspectives on Accounting for M&A Amir Amel-Zadeh, Geoff Meeks, Jaqueline Gay Meeks, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2015
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2732253

Geoff Meeks, J. Gay Meeks, Mergers, accountants, and economic efficiency in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 1/2014, pp 121-136, DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-001007