Antoine de Monchrestien and Antonio Serra: Two founders of political economy

Journal title HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY
Author/s André Tiran
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1
Language English Pages 12 P. 89-100 File size 221 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2017-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this paper is to situate the contribution of Antoine de Montchrestien and Antonio Serra in the monetary and financial environment of their time. The contribution of these early writers are placed back in context - that of the profound economic crisis in Europe: the monetary crisis in the Kingdom of Naples, and in France the crisis preceding the General Assembly in 1614 -15. After this analysis it may seem that they are many commonalities between Serra and Montchrestien. There is first of all their external personal situation to the circle of governors. Then there is the failure to take account of their analysis by those in power, the governors. They focus both on the real factors of economic development, investment, workforce. All this in a long-term vision, which excludes any monetary fetishism, puts the focus on combination and relationship between the economy and the state.

Keywords: Antoine de Montchrestien; Antonio Serra; Marc’Antonio De Santis; real and monetary factors.

Jel codes: B11; B19; B31

  1. Brazzini, G. (1988). Dall’economia aristotelica all’economia politica. Saggio sul “Traicté” di Montchrétien, Pisa, Ets Editrice.
  2. Clément, A. (2005). Les mercantilistes et la question coloniale aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles, Outre-mers, 92(348-349), 2e semestre 2005. La loi de 1905 et les colonies: 167-202.
  3. De Santis, M. [1605a]. Discorso intorno agli effetti che fa il cambio in Regno, and [1615b] Secondo discorso […] sopra una risposta che è stata fatta averso del primo, in R. Colapietra, (ed.) Problemi monetari negli scrittori napoletani del Seicento, Roma, Academia dei Lincei, 1973.
  4. Keynes J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London, MacMillan.
  5. Montchrestien, A. de. [1615] (1889). Traicté de L’oeconomie politique. Dédié en 1615 au Roy et à la Reyne Mère du Roy. Paris, E. Plon, Nourrit.
  6. Rosselli A. (1995). Moneta e sviluppo nel Breve Trattato di Antonio Serra, in Roncaglia A. (ed.) Alle Origini del pensiero economico in Italia, Bologna, il Mulino: 18-19.
  7. Serra, A. (1613) Breve trattato delle cause che possono far abbondare li regni d’oro et d’argento, dove non sono miniere, con applicazione al regna di Napoli, Napoli, L. Scorriggio.
  8. Spector, C. (2003). Le concept de mercantilisme, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 3(39): 289-309.
  9. Steiner, P. (1993). L’émergence des catégories économiques in Béraud A. et al., Nouvelle histoire de la pensée économique, Vol.1 Paris, La Découverte, “Hors collection Sciences Humaines”: 103-110.

  • Political economy revisited: structures and objectives at the systemic level Ivano Cardinale, Roberto Scazzieri, in Economia Politica /2024 pp.153
    DOI: 10.1007/s40888-024-00331-4

André Tiran, Antoine de Monchrestien and Antonio Serra: Two founders of political economy in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 1/2017, pp 89-100, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2017-001004