The discrepancy of the Green vote. A study on the variation of ecological support between Europe and Italy

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Author/s Barbara Sonzogni, Dario Germani
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/131 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 216-229 File size 277 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2023-131014
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The central nature of the theme of sustainability both at the public insti- tutional and private level is undisputed. It is at the heart of international and national intervention policies and people feel increasingly involved, such that individual sensitivity to these issues is increasingly developed and also found in concrete changes of people’s focus and lifestyles. Starting from this framework, this paper aims to investigate the gap – by comparing Europe and Italy – and the coherence of the widespread feeling of sensitivity towards environmental issues on the part of citizens and the electoral consensus of the Green parties with their tradition of paying greater attention to these issues. The analysis was carried out empirically analyzing Italy through the construction of a dataset characterized by context variables of the single regions, thus deepening the co- herence between the trends in terms of sensitivity towards green issues and the political support to parties that champion such issues. The picture that emerges raises significant questions about the reasons, dynamics and factors underlying the variation in support of the Green parties between the different contexts un- der consideration.

  1. C B. Carli (2017), L’uomo e il clima, Bologna, il Mulino.
  2. A.M. Zaccaria (2021), «Cambiamento climatico: un processo sociale complesso», Sociologia urbana e rurale, 126, pp. 45-60, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2021-126003
  3. D. Chakrabarty (2021), La sfida del cambiamento climatico, Verona, Ombre Corte. Commissione Europea (2019), Comunicazione della Commissione al Parlamento euro-peo, al Consiglio, al Comitato economico e sociale europeo e al Comitato delle regioni, -- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri = cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75e- d71a1.0006.02/DOC_1&format = PDF.
  4. Demos (2022), «Gli italiani e la politica a un mese e mezzo dalle elezioni”, Atlante politico, 103, -- http://www.demos.it/a02007.php.
  5. Demos (2023), Crescita economica e protezione dell’ambiente, http://www.demos.it/a02101.php.
  6. Ecco (2022a), Un programma per il clima,- https://eccoclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ un-programma-per-il-clima.pdf.
  7. Ecco (2022b), Transizione ecologica: l’opportunità di ripresa che accomuna centro, destra e sini- stra, https://eccoclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/More-in-common-14luglio830.pdf.
  8. Eligendo, Il sistema integrato di diffusione dei risultati elettorali, https://elezioni.interno.gov.it/.
  9. Eurobarometro (2021), Commissione Europea, 2273/SP513, -- https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/ surveys/detail/2273.
  10. European Commission (2016), Sustainable Development: EU sets out its priorities, -- https:// ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/it/IP_16_3883.
  11. European Commission (2021a), Standard Eurobarometer 95 – Spring 2021, -- https://europa.eu/ eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2532.
  12. European Commission (2021b), Eurobarometer Climate Change, https://europa.eu/eurobaro- meter/surveys/detail/2273.
  13. European Environment Agency (2021), Sustainable Development Goals and the environment in Europe: A cross-country analysis and 39 country profiles, -- https://commission.europa.eu/ events/sustainable-development-goals-2017-06-21_en.
  14. European Parliament (2021), Fit for 55 package, -- https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etu- des/BRIE/2022/733513/EPRS_BRI(2022)733513_EN.pdf.
  15. M. Fiordalisi (2022), «Elezioni 2022 e digitale: ecco i programmi dei principali partiti», Net- work Digital 360, -- https://www.corrierecomunicazioni.it/digital-economy/elezioni-2022-e- digitale-ecco-i-programmi-dei-principali-partiti/.
  16. Ipsos (2021), Cop26 Glasgow, sostenibilità e lotta al cambiamento climatico: il punto di vista degli italiani, -- https://www.ipsos.com/it-it/cop26-glasgow-sostenibilita-lotta-cambiamento- climatico-punto-vista-italiani/.
  17. Ipsos (2022a), Elezioni politiche, 25 settembre 2022: i principali motivi e temi driver di voto degli italiani, -- https://www.ipsos.com/it-it/elezioni-politiche-principali-motivi-temi-driver- voto-italiani.
  18. Ipsos (2022b), Come sarà il 2023? Previsioni e aspettative globali per l’anno che verrà, https:// -- Istat (2022), Preoccupazioni ambientali e comportamenti ecocompatibili, https://www.istat.it/
  19. it/files//2022/07/TODAY-COMPORTAMENTI-AMBIENTALI-2021.pdf.
  20. R. Keucheyan (2019), La natura è un campo di battaglia. Saggio di ecologia politica, Verona, Ombre Corte.
  21. N. Klein (2019), Il mondo in fiamme. Contro il capitalismo per salvare il clima, Milano, Fel- trinelli.
  22. B. Latour (2015), Face à Gaïa. Huit conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique, Paris,
  23. La Découverte; tr. it. La sfida di Gaia. Il nuovo regime climatico, Milano, Meltemi, 2020.
  24. L. Lewis Simon, A. Maslin Mark (2019), Il pianeta umano. Come abbiamo creato l’Antropo- cene, Torino, Einaudi.
  25. T. Morton (2020), Noi, esseri ecologici, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

Barbara Sonzogni, Dario Germani, La discrasia dei voti verdi. Uno studio sulla variazione del sostegno ecologista tra Europa e Italia in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 131/2023, pp 216-229, DOI: 10.3280/SR2023-131014