Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures

Titolo Rivista: CADMO
Autori/Curatori: Jo-Anne Baird, Adrian Coxell
Anno di pubblicazione: 2009 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 18 P. 105-122 Dimensione file: 309 KB
DOI: 10.3280/CAD2009-002011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

<em>Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures</em> - Politicians and civil servants are very much involved in examination developments in many countries. Policy development and implementation is notoriously difficult to unpick in terms of decision-making, roles and responsibilities. Nonetheless, three systemic examination failures are used to illustrate the problems caused by the policy context – in Scotland 2000, New Zealand 2004 and England 2008. Taking these cases and the literature together, it is argued that features of the policy environment conspire to generate latent errors: 1) evolving policy and competing perspectives; 2) lack of role clarity and diffusion of responsibility and 3) timeframe slippage. Human error theory indicates that to try to reduce errors we must understand their fundamental causes and that these usually run deeper than the first stories that are told. Understanding the full reasons for particular systemic examination errors is difficult because politics is slippery, and many perspectives have to be sifted.

  • ‘Maybe I'm not as good as I think I am.’ How qualification users interpret their examination results Suzanne Chamberlain, in Educational Research /2012 pp.39
    DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2012.658198
  • The meaning of curriculum-related examination standards in Scotland and England: a home–international comparison Jo-Anne Baird, Lena Gray, in Oxford Review of Education /2016 pp.266
    DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1184866

Jo-Anne Baird, Adrian Coxell, Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures in "CADMO" 2/2009, pp 105-122, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2009-002011