Click here to download

Public Educators: Dutch Historians Influence Contemporary Politics
Journal Title: MEMORIA E RICERCA  
Author/s: Hinke Piersma 
Year:  2011 Issue: 37 Language: Italian 
Pages:  15 Pg. 71-85 FullText PDF:  123 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MER2011-037005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The accumulation of knowledge by government institutions has never been a judgment-free activity. Ever since its foundation in 1945, the Netherlands Institute for Study and Documentation of the Second World War (presently NIOD) has been trying to find a balance between scholarly pursuits and its social impact. In this article I explore three highly-debated cases, in which two NIOD directors were involved. These cases include: the fall of the Christian Democratic politician Willem Aantjes, the affair surrounding the Dutch war criminal Pieter Menten, and the dramatic events in Srebrenica and the question of Dutch responsibility. These topics are examples of situations in which scholarly research is intertwined with political debate. It raises the question of the role of historians when the past is publicly on trial. How is such a public role on the part historians affecting the profession in general, and, more specifically, is there a danger that historical research could become nothing other than politics by other means?
Keywords: Second World War; Collaboration; Dutch politics; Historians as hangman; Public History; Education

Hinke Piersma, Public Educators: Dutch Historians Influence Contemporary Politics in "MEMORIA E RICERCA " 37/2011, pp. 71-85, DOI:10.3280/MER2011-037005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content