Click here to download

Many "Mechanisms", no "Mechanism". The Lack of Sense of the Term "Analytical Sociology"
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE  
Author/s: Maurizio Bonolis 
Year:  2011 Issue: 95 Language: Italian 
Pages:  36 Pg. 13-48 FullText PDF:  356 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SR2011-095002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This study aims to evaluate whether, within the more general field of sociology, it is justifiable to set a boundary line for a specific orientation called «analytical sociology». The task is faced by showing that - as happens to all empirical disciplines that borrow this term - the qualification of analytical is a conceptual approximation, essentially a metaphor, which can not be tied to Kant’s definition. Furthermore, the essay highlights that the trait claimed specifically by the would-be «analytical sociology» orientation, that is defining things through «mechanisms», does not in any way differ from sociological explanations tout court. «Explaining» means reconstructing causative links through the use of models, theoretical constructions, or principles of connecting regularity. Since the supporters of the so-called analytical sociology define «mechanism» in these very terms, this means that in sociological tradition the explanations have always used a similar path and therefore the text offers a significant explanation as proof. However, this also means that there are no valid assumptions to distinguish, in sociology, such a specific epistemological or theoretical orientation as the «analytical» one.

Maurizio Bonolis, Many "Mechanisms", no "Mechanism". The Lack of Sense of the Term "Analytical Sociology" in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 95/2011, pp. 13-48, DOI:10.3280/SR2011-095002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content