L’adozione mite: peculiarità, criteri di successo e valutazione di outcome
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori: Caterina Balenzano, Giuseppe Moro, Rosalinda Cassibba
Anno di pubblicazione: 2013
Fascicolo: 1
Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 21
P. 139-159
Dimensione file: 241 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SP2013-001008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:
clicca qui
qui
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A.
2001 Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles, University of
Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families
- Ammaniti, M. et alii.
1990 IAL. Intervista sull’attaccamento nella latenza, Manoscritto non pubblicato,
Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi “La Sapienza”, Roma.
- Balenzano C., Moro G, Cassibba R.
2011 Welfare municipale e sostegno alla famiglia: valutazione del ruolo dei servizi
territoriali nell’adozione mite, in «Politiche sociali e servizi», 1, pp. 97-108 (in revisione), Modelli e metodi per la valutazione delle politiche familiari evidencebased,
in «Studi di Sociologia».
(submitted), Dall’affido all’adozione: esplorare processi e percorsi mediante
l’analisi dei fascicoli giudiziari, in «Autonomie locali e Servizi sociali».
- Barth, R. P., & Berry, M.
1988 Adoption and disruption: Risks, rates, and responses, New York, Aldine de
Gruyter.
- Bracken, B. A.
1992 MSCS. Multidimensional Self-Concept Scale, Austin, PRO-ED, trad. it.
TMA. Test di valutazione Multidimensionale dell’Autostima, Trento
Erickson, 1993
- Brodzinsky, D. & Palacios, J. (Eds.)
2005 Psychological Issues in Adoption: Research and Practice, New York,
Greenwood Publishing Group
- Brodzinsky, D. M., Smith, D. W., & Brodzinsky, A. B.
1998 Children’s adjustment to adoption: Developmental and clinical issues,
Thousand Oaks, Sage
- Brooks, D., Allen, J., & Barth, R. P.
2002 Adoption services use, helpfulness, and need: A comparison of public and
private agency and independent adoptive families, in «Children and Youth
Services Review», 24, pp. 213–238.
- Cassibba, R., Abbruzzese, S., Costantini, A., & Gatto, S.
2009 L’adozione mite: giudici professionali e giudici onorari a confronto, in
«Minorigiustizia», 1, pp. 112-122
- Corianò, A.
2008 Adozione Mite: conclusioni, www.dirittominorile.it/news/news.asp?id=798
- Costanzo, S.
2008 Nel percorso diventa cruciale la costruzione di un’altra identità familiare, in
«Guida al diritto, Il Sole 24 Ore, Famiglia e minori», 9, pp. 31-34.
- Dell’Erba G. et alii.
2010 Lo standard del profilo SCL90R. Studio su campione di N. 1216 soggetti per
la costruzione di norme italiane locali, in «Psicopuglia», 1, pp. 9-19.
- Derogatis, L. R.
1994 SCL-90-R: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual, Minneapolis,
National Computer Systems
- Edelstein, S., Burge, D., & Waterman, J.
2002 Older Children in Preadoptive Homes: Issues Before Termination of
Parental Rights, in «Child Welfare», 81, 2, pp. 101-121.
- Etter, J.
1993 Levels of Cooperation and Satisfaction in 56 Open Adoptions, in «Child
Welfare», 72, 3, pp. 257-267.
- Fiorini, M.,
2008a Con l’adozione mite una risposta ai bambini del limbo, in «Famiglia e
minori» 9, pp. 11-12.
- 2008b Corsia preferenziale all’esigenza di garantire la continuità degli affetti, in
«Famiglia e minori» 9, pp. 19-23
- Giasanti, A., & Rossi, E., (a cura di)
2007 Affido forte e adozione mite: culture in trasformazione, Milano,
FrancoAngeli
- Gibbs, D., Barth, R. P, & Houts, R.
2005 Family Characteristics and Dynamics Among Families Receiving
Postadoption Services, in «Families in Society», 86, 4, pp. 520-532.
- Grotevant, H., & McRoy, R.
1997 The Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project: Implications of Openness
in Adoption for Development and Relationship, in «Applied Developmental
Science», 1, 4.
- Groze, V.
1996 Successful adoptive families: A longitudinal study of special needs adoption,
Westport, Praeger
- Howe, D. & Steele, M.,
2004 Contact in Cases in which Children have been Traumatically Abused or
Neglected by their Birth Parents, in E. Neil, & D. Howe (Eds.), Contact in
Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, Theory and Practice,
London, British Association for Adoption and Fostering.
- ones, M.
2002 Orders or Agreements? in H. Argent (ed.) Staying Connected: Managing
Contact Arrangements in Adoption, London, British Agencies for Adoption
and Fostering
- Lee, J. S., Twaite, J. A.
1997 Open Adoption and Adoptive Mothers: Attitudes toward Birthmothers,
adopted Children and Parenting, in «American Journal of Orthopsychiatry»,
67, 4, pp. 576-584
- Logan, J.
2010 Preparation and Planning for Face-to-Face Contact after Adoption: the
Experience of Adoptive Parents in a UK study, in «Child and Family Social
Work», 15, 3, pp. 315-324.
- Macaskill, C.
2002 Safe Contact? Children in Permanent Placement and Contact with their
Birth Relatives, Lyme Regis, Russell House Publishing
- McDonald, T. P., Lieberman, A. A., Partridge, S., & Hornby, H.
1991 Assessing the Role of Agency Aervices in reducing Adoption Disruptions, in
«Children and Youth Services Review», 13, pp. 425- 438.
- McGlone, K., Santos, L., Kazama, L., Fong, R., & Mueller, C.
2002 Psychological Stress in Adoptive Parents of Special-Needs Children, in
«Child Welfare», 81, pp. 151-171.
- Miall, C. E. & March, K.,
2005a Community Attitudes Toward Birth Fathers’ Motives for Adoption
Placement and Single Parenting, in «Family Relations», 54, pp. 535-546.
- Molina, V. E., M. S. W.
2008 The Post Adoption Experience: The Early years of Motherhood
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), California State University, Long
Beach.
- Moos, R., & Moos, B.
1986 Family Environment Scale (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologist
Press.
- Nalavany, B. A., Ryan, S. D., & Hinterlong, J.
2009 Externalizing Behavior Among Adopted Boys with Preadoptive Histories of
Child Sexual Abuse, in «Journal of Child Sexual Abuse», 18, 5, pp. 553-573.
- Neil, E.
2009 Post-adoption Contact and Openness in Adoptive Parents’ minds:
Consequences for children’s development, in «British Journal of Social
Work», 39, 1, pp. 5-23.
- Occhiogrosso, F.
2007 L’adozione mite e le nuove prospettive emergenti, in A. Giasanti, E. Rossi
(a cura di), Affido forte e adozione mite, Milano, FrancoAngeli, pp. 91-117
- Occhiogrosso, F. P.
2008 Se il “semiabbandono” ha carattere permanente è applicabile l’istituto, in
«Famiglia e Minori», 9, pp. 13-18.
- Palacios, J.,
2006 The Ecology of Adoption, Keynote presentation at the Second International
Conference on Adoption Research, UEA, Norwich
- Partidge, S., Hornby, H., & McDonald, T.
1986 Legacies of loss- Vision of Gain: An inside Look at Adoption Disruptions,
Portland, Centre for research and Advanced Study, University of Southern
Main.
- Rompf, E. L.
1993 Open Adoption: What does the “average person” think?, in «ChildWelfare»,
72, pp. 219-230
- Rosenthal, J. A., & Groze, V. K.
1992 Special Needs Adoption: A follow-up study of intact families, New York,
Praeger.
- Rosati, R. (a cura di)
2010 Il legame adottivo. Contributi internazionali per la ricerca e l’intervento,
Milano, Unicopli
- Rosnati, R.
2005 The construction of adoptive parenthood and filiation in Italian families with
adolescents: A family perspective in D. M. Brodzinsky & J. Palacios (Eds.),
Psychological issues in Adoption: Research and Practice, Westport, Praeger,
pp. 187-210
- Rosnati, R., Iafrate, R., & Scabini, E.
2007 Parent–adolescent Communication in Foster, Intercountry Adoptive and
Biological Italian Families: Gender and Generational Differences, in
«International Journal of Psychology», 24, pp. 35-45.
- Ruini, C., Ottolini, F., Rafanelli, C., Ryff, C., Fava, G. A.
2003 La validazione italiana delle Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB). Italian
validation of Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB), in «Rivista di
psichiatria», 38, 3.
- Ryff, C. D.
1989 Happiness is Everything, or is it? Explorations on the Meaning of
Psychological Well-being, in «Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology», 57, pp. 1069-1081.
- Selwyn, J.
2004 Placing older children in new families: Changing patterns of contact in E.
Neil, and D. Howe (Eds.), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care:
Research, Theory and Practice, London, British Association for Adoption
and Fostering.
- Simmel, C.
2007 Risk and Protective Factors Contributing to the Longitudinal Psychosocial
Well-Being of Adopted Foster Children, in «Journal of Emotional &
Behavioral Disorders», 15, 4, pp. 237-249
- Smith, S. & Howard, J.
1994 The Adoption Preservation Project, Normal, IL, Illinois State University,
Department of Social Work
- Smith, S., Howard, J., & Monroe, A.
2000 Issues Underlying Behavior Problems in at-risk Adopted Children, in
«Children and Youth Services Review», 22, pp. 539-562.
- Stagi, L.
2000 Il focus group come tecnica di valutazione. Pregi, difetti, potenzialità, in
«Rassegna italiana di valutazione», 20, pp. 67-88.
- Wilson, K., & Sinclair, I.
2004 Contact in Foster Care: Some Dilemmas and Opportunities in E. Neil, & D.
Howe (Eds.). Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care, London,
British Association for Adoption and Fostering.
- Zosky, D. L., Howard, J. A., Smith, S. L., Howard, A. H., & Shelvin, K. H.
2005 Investing in adoptive families: What adoptive families tell us regarding the
benefits of adoption preservation services, in «Adoption Quarterly», 8.
- Caterina Balenzano, Gabrielle Coppola, Rosalinda Cassibba, Giuseppe Moro, Pre-adoption adversities and adoptees' outcomes: The protective role of post-adoption variables in an Italian experience of domestic open adoption in Children and Youth Services Review /2018 pp. 307, DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.012
- Caterina Balenzano, Approccio partecipativo e valutazione di outcome: l'uso del brainstorming nella definizione dei criteri per valutare l'efficacia dei percorsi adottivi in RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 65/2017 pp. 7, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2016-065002
Caterina Balenzano, Giuseppe Moro, Rosalinda Cassibba, in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2013, pp. 139-159, DOI:10.3280/SP2013-001008