Click here to download

Campo incarnato, rêverie corporea e pazienti con blocchi della simbolizzazione
Journal Title: EDUCAZIONE SENTIMENTALE 
Author/s: Giuseppe Civitarese 
Year:  2013 Issue: 20 Language: Italian 
Pages:  7 Pg. 25-31 FullText PDF:  642 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EDS2013-020003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Embodied Field, Somatic Reverie and Patients with Blocks to Symbolization. There are situations which manifestly involve a serious difficulty of symbolizing due to the absence of foundations for more mature mental functioning - that is, a background of sufficient familiarity or continuity of being. To re-establish movement, the path to symbolization may pass by way of the analyst’s capacity to maintain the faculty of imagination, but even before this, by dreaming in the body (or, better, in the "somatic field") what is happening, so to get in touch with the crisis, and to provide an initial representation of it, this representation itself affording virtual salvation. Sensory reveries (or rather, bodily reveries i.e. ones without immediate representational content or perceptive quality or conscious intentionality) are a way of bringing about initial transformations in the direction of thought. Of course the concept of embodied field and somatic reverie only are meaningful within a radical intersubjective theory of the unconscious communication between minds, in our case a Bionian theory of the analytic field.

  1. Bernstein J.S. (1975-76). The Autistic Character. Psychoanal Rev, 62: 537-555.
  2. Bleger J. (1967). Simbiosi e ambiguità. Studio psicoanalitico. Roma: Armando, 2010.
  3. Civitarese G. (2004). Vincolo simbiotico e setting. In: L’intima stanza: teoria e tecnica del campo analitico. Roma: Borla.
  4. Civitarese G. (2011). La violenza delle emozioni: Bion e la psicoanalisi postbioniana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  5. Ferro A. (2008). The Patient as the Analyst’s Best Colleague: Transformation into a Dream and Narrative Transformations. Ital Psychoanal Annu, 2: 199-205.
  6. Ferro A. e Civitarese G. (2013, in stampa). Espacements. Filigrane.
  7. Kristeva J. (1975). La rivoluzione nel linguaggio poetico. Milano: Spirali, 2007.
  8. Ogden T.H. (1989). Il limite primigenio dell’esperienza. Roma: Astrolabio, 1992.
  9. Ogden T.H. (1994). The Concept of Interpretive Action. Psychoanal Q, 63: 219-245.
  10. Ogden T.H. (2003). What’s True and Whose Idea Was it? Int J psychoanal, 84: 593-606,, DOI: 10.1516/HHJT-H54F-DQB5-422W
  11. Sandler J. (1976). Dreams, Unconscious Fantasies and “Identity of Perception”. Int R Psycho-Anal, 3: 33-42.

Giuseppe Civitarese, in "EDUCAZIONE SENTIMENTALE" 20/2013, pp. 25-31, DOI:10.3280/EDS2013-020003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content