Click here to download

Intercultural families between definitions and social change
Journal Title: PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’ 
Author/s: Tiziana Mancini, Chiara Panari, Laura Fruggeri 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  9 Pg. 11-19 FullText PDF:  703 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSC2013-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The psychological analysis of the families where partner belong to different cultural groups needs to address some theoretical and methodological issues. The first one concerns the epistemological perspective used to study the concept of culture. The second refers to the definition of mixed or intercultural couple. The third question is related to the approaches adopted to analyse the influence of group identity on family processes. In this article we refer to the concept of culture not as independent from individuals but from within a system of psycho-social factors that contribute to develop the dynamics of these families, and we underline the relevant repercussions that this perspective has on the methodological approach.
Keywords: Intercultural families, cultural psychology, family dynamics.

  1. Berry J.W., Portiga Y.H., Segall M.H. e Dasen P.R. (1992). Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press (trad. it.: Psicologia transculturale. Milano: Guerini, 1994).
  2. Cole M. (2004). La psicologia culturale. Bari: Edizioni Carlo Amore (ed. or. 1996).
  3. Edelstein C. (2000). Le Coppie Miste. Quaderni di Psicologia, Analisi Transazionale e Scienze Umane, 31, 118-141.
  4. Falicov C.J. (1995). Training to Think Culturally: a Multidimensional Comparative Framework. Family Process, 34, 4, 373-388., DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00373.
  5. Fenaroli P. e Panari C. (2006). Famiglie miste e identità culturali. Roma: Carocci editore.
  6. Foeman A. e Nance, T. (1999). From Miscegenation to Multiculturalism. Perceptions and Stages of Interracial Relationship Development. Journal of Black Studies, 29, 4, 540-557, testo disponibile al sito: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2645869
  7. Fruggeri L. (1998). Famiglie. Roma: Carocci.
  8. Fruggeri L. (2005). Diverse normalità. Roma: Carocci.
  9. Guyaux A., Delcroix C., Rodriguez E. e Randane, A. (1992). Double Mixte. Le rencontre de deux culture dans le Marriage. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  10. Gurung R.A.R. e Duong T. (1999). Mixing and Matching: Assessing the Concomitants of Mixed-ethnic Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 16, 5, 639-657., DOI: 10.1177/0265407599165005HagendoornL.(1995).IntergroupBiasesinMultipleGroupSystems:thePerceptionofEthnicHierarchies.EuropeanReviewofSocialPsychology,6,199-228.DOI:10.1080/1479277944300005
  11. Huston T. (2000). The Social Ecology of Marriage and Other Intimate Unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 298-320., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00298.
  12. Kulczycki A. e Lobo A.P. (2002). Patterns, Determinants, and Implications of Intermarriage among Arab Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 1, 202-210., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00202.
  13. ISTAT (2012). Il matrimonio in Italia. Statistiche report. 28 novembre 2012. Testo disponibile al sito http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/75517
  14. Mancini T. (2006). Psicologia dell’identità etnica. Roma: Carocci.
  15. Mancini T. e Panari C. (2010). Gli immigrati sono tutti uguali? Uno studio sulla
  16. gerarchia etnica nel contesto italiano. Psicologia Sociale, 1, 133-146., DOI: 10.1482/3202
  17. Mantovani G. (2004). Intercultura. È possibile evitare le guerre culturali? Bologna: il Mulino.
  18. Mantovani G. (2008). Analisi del discorso e contesto sociale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  19. Markus H.R. e Kitayana S. (2010). Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420-430., DOI: 10.1177/174569161037555
  20. Molina B., Burnett J.A. e Estrada D. (2004). Cultural Communities: Challenges and Opportunities in the Creation of “Happily Ever After” Stories of Intercultural Couplehood”. The Family Journal: Counseling And Therapy For Couples And Families, 1, 2, 139-147.
  21. Monacelli N. e Mancini T. (2005). Appartenenze culturali e dinamiche famigliari. In: Fruggeri L., a cura di, Diverse normalità. Roma: Carocci, cap. 6, pp. 165-190.
  22. O’Donoghue M. (2004). Racial and Ethnic Identity Development in White Mothers of Biracial, Black-White Children. Affilia, 19, 1, 68-84., DOI: 10.1177/088610990326079
  23. Panari C. (2008). Le famiglie interculturali: identità, dinamiche famigliari e sociali. Tesi di Dottorato in Psicologia Sociale. Università degli Studi di Parma, testo disponibile al sito: http://hdl.handle.net/1889/795
  24. Panari C., Mancini T. e Fruggeri L. (2010). Le sfide delle famiglie interculturali: solo una questione di “appartenenze”? La prospettiva della cultura situata, Rivista di Studi Familiari, 2, 42-59.
  25. Scabini E., Regalia C. e Giuliani C. (2007). La famiglia nell’incontro con le culture. In: Mazzara B., a cura di, Prospettiva di psicologia culturale. Modelli teorici e contesti d’azione. Roma: Carocci, cap. 8, pp. 197-217.
  26. Tullio-Altan C. (1995). Ethnos e civiltà. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Tiziana Mancini, Chiara Panari, Laura Fruggeri, Intercultural families between definitions and social change in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 1/2013, pp. 11-19, DOI:10.3280/PSC2013-001002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content