Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Implementare i personal budget per l’assistenza sociale: alcuni insegnamenti fondamentali dalle esperienze e dalle evidenze empiriche inglesi ed internazionali
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI 
Autori/Curatori: Sarah Carr 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2013 Fascicolo: 3 Personalizzare il welfare. Riccardo Prandini, Charles F. Sabel (a cura di) Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  31 P. 79-109 Dimensione file:  748 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SP2013-003004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This paper examines evidence on the design and implementation of personal budget schemes from some of the English and international literature. The particular focus is on personal budgets in social care. It is not an exhaustive systematic review covering all related issue, but gives some key lessons for promoting personal budget uptake from research on user and carer responses, staff training and development, risk and safeguarding, and costeffectiveness implications. The paper also compares some features of different approaches in other countries and offers a brief exploration of the policy contexts. In the UK, while personal budgets aim at giving individuals more choice and control over their care and support, they need to be seen as part of the wider adult social care personalization agenda and are just one part of the picture. The provision of personal budgets needs to be consistent with the principles and values of personalization: personal budgets should maximize choice and control for people using services, their carers, and families wherever possible. International research shows that - to achieve this - independent advice and support services, but also confident, well-informed and trained staff (capable of relationship-based working) are vital. Evidence shows that central government has a role to play in setting strategy, issuing guidance and investing in the support infrastructure for implementation.


Keywords: Personal budget; Direct payments; Adult Social Care; Personalization

  1. ACEVO 2010 A People Power Revolution: Report of the Commission on Personalisation, London, ACEVO.
  2. ADASS 2009a Making Progress with Putting People First: Self-Directed Support, London, DH/ADASS/IDeA/LGA.
  3. 2009b Common Resource Allocation Framework, London, DH/ADASS.
  4. 2011 ADASS Personal budgets Survey March 2011 (updated 29/06/11), London, ADASS.
  5. Alakeson, V. 2008 Let Patients Control the Purse Strings, in «British Medical Journal», 336, pp. 807-809.
  6. Arksey, H. e Kemp, P. 2008 Dimensions of Choice: a Narrative Review of Cash-for-Care Schemes. Working paper no. DHP 2250. York, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  7. Artnz, M. e Thomsen, S. 2011 Crowding Out Informal Care? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Germany, in «Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics», 73, 3., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00616.
  8. Audit Commission 2006 Choosing Well: Analysing the Costs and Benefits of Choice in Local Public Services, London, Audit Commission.
  9. Barczyk, A. e Lincore, J. 2010 Cash and Counseling: A Model for Self-Directed Care Programs to Empower Individuals with Serious Mental Illnesses, in «Social Work in Mental Health», 8, pp. 209-224.
  10. Barry, M. 2007 Effective Approaches to Risk Assessment in Social Work: an International Literature Review, Edinburgh, Scottish Executive Social Research.
  11. Bartlett, J. 2009 At your Service: Navigating the Future Market in Health and Social Care, London, Demos.
  12. Baxter, K., Glendinning, C. e Greener, I. 2011 The Implications of Personal budgets for the Home Care Market, in «Public Money and Management», 31, 2, pp. 91-98.
  13. Bennett, T., Cattermole, M. e Sanderson, H. 2009 Outcome-Focused Reviews. A Practical Guide, London, Dept. of Health.
  14. Beresford, P. 2009 Compass Think Piece 47: Whose Personalisation? London, Compass.
  15. Bewley, C. e McCulloch, L. 2004 Helping Ourselves: Direct payments and the Development of Peer Support, London, Values into Action.
  16. Brindle, D. 2008 Care and Support: a Community Responsibility? York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  17. Caldwell, J. 2007 Experiences of Families with Relatives with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in a Consumer-directed Support Program, in «Disability & Society», 22, 6, pp. 549-562.
  18. Carers UK 2008 Choice or Chore: Carers’ Experiences of Direct payments, London, Carers UK.
  19. Carlson, B., Foster, L., Dale, S.B. e Brown R. 2007 Effects of Cash and Counseling on Personal Care and well-being, in «Health Services Research», 42, 1, Part II, pp. 467-487., DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00673.x
  20. Carr, S. 2008 Personalisation: a Rough Guide, London, SCIE. 2010a Personalisation, Productivity and Efficiency, SCIE Report 37, London, SCIE.
  21. 2010b Enabling Risk, Ensuring Safety, Self-directed Support and Personal budgets, SCIE Report 36, London, SCIE.
  22. 2011 Enabling Risk and Ensuring Safety: Self-directed Support and Personal budgets, in «The Journal of Adult Protection», 13, 3, pp. 122-136.
  23. 2013 Making Personal budgets Work for Older People and Older People Living with Dementia: A UK Evidence Overview, London, SCIE.
  24. Carr, S. e Robbins, D. 2009 The Implementation of Individual Budget Schemes in Adult Social Care, SCIE Research Briefing 20, London, SCIE.
  25. Citron, T., Brooks-Lane, N., Crandell, D., Brady, K., Cooper, M. e Revell, G.,
  26. 2008 A Revolution in the Employment Process of Individuals with Disabilities: Customized Employment as the Catalyst for System Change, in «Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation», 28, pp. 169-179.
  27. Cloutier, H., Malloy, J., Hagner, D. e Cotton, P. 2006 Choice and Control Over Resources: New Hampshire’s Individual Career Account Demonstration Projects, in «Journal of Rehabilitation», 72, pp. 4-11.
  28. Commission for Social Care Inspection 2004 Direct payments. What are the Barriers? London, Commission for Social Care Inspection.
  29. 2009 The State of Social Care in England 2007-20008: Executive Summary London, CSCI.
  30. Da Roit, B., Le Bihan, B. e Österle, A. 2007 Long-term Care Policies in Italy, Austria and France: Variations in cash for care Schemes, in «Social Policy and Administration», 41, 6, pp. 653-671.
  31. Dale, S. e Brown, R. 2006 Reduced Nursing Home Use Through Consumer Directed Personal Care Services, in «Medical Care», 44, 8, pp. 760-767.
  32. Davey, V., Fernández, J.L., Knapp, M., Vick, N., Jolly, D., Swift, P., Tobin, R., Kendall, J., Ferrie, J., Pearson, C., Mercer G., e Priestley M. 2007 Direct payments: a National Survey of Direct payments Policy and Practice, London, PSSRU, London School of Economics.
  33. Department of Health 2006 Our Health, our Care, our Say: a New Direction for Community Services, London.
  34. 2007 Independence, Choice and Risk: a Guide to Best Practice in Supported Decision Making, London.
  35. 2008 High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report, London.
  36. 2009a Personal Health Budgets: First Steps, London.
  37. 2009b Safeguarding Adults: Response to Consultation on the Review of the No Secrets Guidance, London.
  38. 2009 Understanding Personal Health Budgets, London.
  39. 2010 A Vision for Adult Social Care: Active Citizens, Capable Communities, London.
  40. Department of Health-Association of Directors of Social Services (ADASS) 2010 Briefing Note: Personal budgets: Managed Services, London, Department of Health.
  41. Doty, P., Mahoney, K.J. e Simon-Rusinowitz, L. 2007 Designing the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation, in «Health Services Research», 42, pp. 378-396., DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00678.
  42. Duffy, S. 2005 Individual budgets: Transforming the Allocation of Resources for Care, in «International Journal of Integrated Care», 13, pp. 8-16.
  43. Ellis, K. 2007 Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: the Significance of “Street-level Bureaucracy” in Determining Eligibility, in «British Journal of Social Work», 37, pp. 405-422.
  44. Fawcett, B. e Plath, D. 2012 A National Disability Insurance Scheme: What Social Work Has to Offer, in «British Journal of Social Work»,, DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs141
  45. Fernández, J.L., Kendall, J., Davey, V. e Knapp, M. 2007 Direct Payments in England: Factors Linked to Variations in Local Provision, in «Journal of Social Policy», 36, 1, pp. 97-121.
  46. Forder, J., Jones, K., Glendinning, C., Caiels, J., Welch, E., Baxter, K., Davidson, J., Windle, K., Irvine, A., King, D. e Dolan, P.
  47. 2012 Evaluation of the Personal Health Budget Pilot Programme: Executive Summary, London, Department of Health.
  48. Foster, M., Harris, J., Jackson, K., Morgan, H. e Glendinning, C. 2006 Personalised Social Care for Adults With Disabilities: A Problematic Concept for Frontline Practice, in «Health and Social Care in the Community», 14, 2, pp. 125-135.
  49. Fox, A. 2009 Putting People First Without Putting Carers Second, Woodford Green, Princess Royal Trust for Carers.
  50. 2012 Personalisation: Lessons from Social Care, London, RSA.
  51. Fyson, R. 2009 Independence and Learning Disabilities: Why We Must Also Recognise Vulnerability, in «International Journal of Integrated Care», 17, 1, pp. 3-8.
  52. Glasby, J. e Littlechild, R. 2009 Direct Payments and Personal Budgets: Putting Personalisation into Practice, Bristol, Policy Press.
  53. Glasby, J. 2008 Individual Patient Budgets: Background and Frequently Asked Questions, Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham.
  54. Glendinning, C. 2007 Improving Equity and Sustainability in UK Funding for Long-Term Care: Lessons From Germany, in «Social Policy and Society», 6, pp. 411-422.
  55. 2009 Combining Choice, Quality and Equity in Social Services: Synthesis Report, Brussels, European Commission on Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
  56. Glendinning, C. et al. 2008a The National Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme, York, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  57. 2008b Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Summary Report, York, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  58. 2008c The National Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Experiences and Implications for Care Coordinators and Managers, York, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  59. 2009 The Individual Budgets Pilot Projects: Impact and Outcomes for Carers, York, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  60. Glendinning, C. e Bell, D. 2008 Rethinking Social Care and Support: What Can England Learn from Other Countries? York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  61. Grit, K. e de Bont, A. 2009 Tailor-Made Finance Versus Tailor-Made Care. Can the State Strengthen Consumer Choice in Healthcare by Reforming the Financial Structure of Long-Term Care?, in «Journal of Medical Ethics», 36, pp.79-83.
  62. Hall, J.L. e Jennings, E.T. 2008 Taking Chances: Evaluating Risk as a Guide to Better Use of Best Practices, in «Public Administration Review», 68, pp. 695-708.
  63. Hawkins, T. 2011 Personalisation Tipping Point Framework, in «The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services», 7, 1, pp. 53-60.
  64. Health Foundation 2011 The Personal Touch: The Dutch Experience of Personal Budgets, London, The Health Foundation.
  65. Henwood, M. e Hudson, B. 2007 Evaluation of the Self-Directed Support Network: An Overview of Key Messages, Department of Health; London.
  66. 2008 Lost to the System? The Impact of Fair Access to Care, London, Commission for Social Care Inspection.
  67. HM Government 2007 Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care, London, HM Government.
  68. IPC 2011 National Market Development Forum Papers, Oxford, IPC.
  69. James, A.N. 2008 A Critical Consideration of the Cash for Care Agenda and its Implications for Social Services in Wales, in «Journal of Adult Protection», 10, pp. 23-34.
  70. Knickman, J.R. e Stone, R.I. 2007 The Public-Private Partnership Behind the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation. Its Origins, Challenges and Unresolved Issues, in «Health Services Research», 42, pp. 362-377.
  71. Kunkel, S. e Nelson, I. 2006 Case Managers’ Perspectives on Consumer Direction, in S. Kunkel e V. Wellin (a cura di), Consumer Voice and Choice in Long Term Care, New York, Springer Publishing, pp. 77-88.
  72. Laragy, C. e Ottmann, G. 2011 Towards a Framework for Implementing Individual Funding Based on an Australian Case Study, in «Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities», 8, 1, pp.18-27.
  73. Larsen, J., Ainsworth, E., Harrop, C., Patterson, S., Hamilton, S., Szymczynska, P., Tew, J., Manthorpe, J., Pinfold, V. 2013 Implementing Personalisation for People with Mental Health Problems: A Comparative Case Study of Four Local Authorities, in «England Journal of Mental Health», 22, 2, pp. 174-182.
  74. Leadbeater, C. et al. 2008 Making it personal, London, Demos.
  75. Lord, J. e Hutchison, P. 2003 Individualised Support and Funding: Building Blocks for Capacity Building and Inclusion, in «Disability and Society», 18, pp. 71-86.
  76. Lymbery, M. 2012 Social Work and Personalisation, in «British Journal of Social Work», 42, pp. 783-792.
  77. Manthorpe, J., Stevens, M., Challis, D., Netten, A., Glendinning, C., Knapp, M., Wilberforce, M., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Moran, N. e Fernandez, J.L.
  78. 2008a Individual Budget Pilots Come under the Microscope, in «Mental Health Today», December-January, pp. 22-27.
  79. Manthorpe, J., Jacobs, S., Rapaport, J., Challis, D., Netten, A., Glendinning, C., Stevens, M., Wilberforce, M., Knapp, M. e Harris, J. 2008b Training for Change: Early Days of Individual Budgets and the Implications for Social Work and Care Management Practice. A Qualitative Study of the Views of Trainers, in «British Journal of Social Work», 10, pp. 1-15.
  80. Manthorpe, J., Stevens, M., Rapaport, J., Harris, J., Jacobs, S., Challis, D., Netten, A., Knapp, M., Wilberforce, M. e Glendinning, C. 2008c Safeguarding and System Change: Early Perceptions of the Implications for Adult Protection Services of the English Individual Budgets Pilots. A Qualitative Study, in «British Journal of Social Work», 12, pp. 1-16.
  81. Masters, J. 2006 The Benefits of Consumer Directed Services for Caregivers of Persons with Alzheimer's Disease, in «The Journal of Contemporary Social Services»,, DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.357
  82. Mitchell, W. e Glendinning, C. 2007 A Review of the Research Evidence Surrounding Risk Perceptions, Risk Management Strategies and their Consequences in Adult Social Care for Different Groups of Service Users. Working paper no. DHR 2180 01.07, York, University of York Social Policy Research Unit.
  83. Moullin, S. 2008 Just Care? A Fresh Approach to Adult Services, London, IPPR.
  84. Mullan, J., Grossman, B.R., Hernandez, M., Wong, A., Eversley, R. e Harrington, C.
  85. 2009 Focus Group Study of Ethnically Diverse Low-Income Users of Paid Personal Assistance Services, in «Home Health Care Services Quarterly», 28, 1, pp. 24-44.
  86. Musingarimi, P. 2009 Social Care Issues Affecting Older Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual People in the UK: A Policy Brief, London, ILC-UK.
  87. Mustafa, N. 2008 How the United Kingdom’s Criminal Records Bureau Can Reduce the Prevalence of Elder Abuse by Improving Recruitment Decision-Making, in «The Journal of Adult Protection», 10, pp. 37-45.
  88. National Audit Office (NAO) 2011 Oversight of User Choice and Provider Competition in Care Markets, London.
  89. Neely-Barnes, S.L., Marcenko, M.O., Weber, L. 2008 Community-Based, Consumer Directed Services: Differential Experiences of People with Mild and Severe Intellectual Disabilities, in «Social Work Research», 32, pp. 55-64.
  90. New Economics Foundation (NEF) 2008 Co-production: A Manifesto for Growing the Core Economy, London, NEF.
  91. Newbronner, L., Chamberlain, R., Bosanquet, K., Bartlett, C., Sass, B. e Glendinning, C. 2010 Keeping Personal Budgets Personal. Learning from the Experiences of Older People, People with Mental Health Problems and Their Carers, SCIE Report 40, London, SCIE.
  92. Newman, J., Glendinning, C., Hughes, M. 2008 Beyond Modernization? Social Care and the Transformation of Welfare Governance, in «Journal of Social Policy», 37, pp. 531-537.
  93. NHS Confederation 2009 Shaping Personal Health Budgets. A View from the Top, London.
  94. O’Brien, D., Ford, L. e Malloy, J. 2005 Person Centered Funding: Using Vouchers and Personal Budgets to Support Recovery and Employment for People with Psychiatric Disabilities, in «Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation», 23, pp. 71-91.
  95. Office for Disability Issues (ODI) 2009 Right to Control: Prospectus for Potential Trailblazers, London.
  96. Ottmann, G., Allen, J., Feldman, P. 2009 Self-directed Community Aged Care for People with Complex Needs: A Literature Review, Melbourne, UCCO/Deakin University, QRN.
  97. Pavolini, E. e Ranci, C. 2008 Restructuring the Welfare State: Reforms in Long-Term Care in Western European Countries, in «Journal of European Social Policy», 18, pp. 246-259.
  98. Pearson, C. (a cura di) 2006 Direct Payments and Personalisation of Care, Edinburgh, Dunedin Academic Press.
  99. Poll. C. e Duffy, S. (a cura di) 2008 A Report on In Control’s Second Phase: Evaluation and Learning, London, In Control Publ.
  100. Poll, C., Hatton, C., Duffy, S. e Sanderson, H. 2006 A report on In Control’s First phase 2003-2005, London, In Control Publ.
  101. Priestley, M., Jolly, D., Pearson, C., Ridell, S., Barnes C. e Mercer G. 2007 Direct Payments and Disabled People in the UK: Supply, Demand and Devolution, in «British Journal of Social Work», 37, 1189-1204.
  102. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit 2005 Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People, London, Cabinet Office.
  103. Raibee, P. e Moran, N. 2008 Interviews with Early Individual Budget Holders, York, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  104. Research in Practice for Adults 2006 How Can Local Authorities Increase the Take-Up of Direct Payment Schemes to Adults with Learning Disabilities?, Dartington, Research in Practice for Adults.
  105. Robert Johnson Wood Foundation 2007 Choosing Independence: A Summary of the Cash & Counselling Model of Self-Directed Personal Assistance Services, Princeton, Robert Johnson Wood Foundation.
  106. Roeher Institute 2000 Individualized Quality of Life Project. Final evaluation report. Canada, Roeher Institute.
  107. Rostgaard, T. 2007 Domiciliary Care for the Elderly. A Danish Perspective. Paper presented at the Conference on Home Care for Ageing Populations: International Comparisons of Domiciliary Care Policies for Older People, 12th March, Dublin, Social Policy and Aging Research Centre, Trinity College, 2007.
  108. Rowlett, N. e Deighton, S.2009 Simplifying Direct Payments: How Lincolnshire County Council Utilised Risk Management to Deliver Genuine Improvement, in «Journal of Care Services Management», 3, pp. 131-143.
  109. Schore, J., Foster, L. e Phillips, B. 2007 Consumer Enrolment and Experiences in the Cash and Counseling Program, in «Health Services Research», 42, pp. 446-466.
  110. Slasberg, C., Slasberg, C, Beresford, P. e Schofield, P. 2012 How Self-directed Support Is Failing to Deliver Personal Budgets and Personalisation, in «Research, Policy and Planning», 29, 3, pp. 161-177.
  111. Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) 2005 Direct Payments: Frequently Asked Questions, SCIE Guide 10, London.
  112. Spall, P., McDonald C., Zetlin, D. 2005 Fixing the System? The Experience of Service Users of The Quasi-Market in Disability Services in Australia, in «Health and Social Care in the Community», 13, 1, pp. 56-63.
  113. Spandler, H. e Vick, N. 2005 Enabling Access to Direct Payments: An Exploration of Care Co-ordinators Decision-Making practices, in «International Journal of Mental Health», 14, pp. 145-155.
  114. 2006 Opportunities for Independent Living Using Direct Payments in Mental Health, in «Health and Social Care in the Community», 14, 107-115.
  115. Stalker, K. 2003 Managing Risk and Uncertainty in Social Work. A Literature Review, in «British Journal of Social Work», 3, pp. 211-233.
  116. Taylor, N. 2008 Obstacles and Dilemmas in the Delivery of Direct Payments to Service Users With Poor Mental Health Practice, in «Social Work in Action», 20, pp. 43-55.
  117. Think Local Act Personal (TLAP) 2011a Think Local Act Personal: A Sector-Wide Commitment to Moving Forward with Personalisation and Community-Based Support, London.
  118. 2011b Personal Budgets: Taking Stock, Moving Forward, London.
  119. 2011c Making it Real: Marking Progress towards Personalised, Community-based Support, London.
  120. 2013 Personal Budgets Outcomes and Evaluation Survey, London.
  121. Tilly, J., Wiener, J.M., Cuellar, A.E. 2005 Consumer-directed home and community services programmes in five countries: Policy issues for older people and government, Washington, DC, The Urban Institute.
  122. Timonen, V., Convery, J. e Cahill, S. 2006 Care Revolutions in the Making? A Comparison of Cash-For-Care Programmes in Four European Countries, in «Ageing and Society», 26, pp. 455-474.
  123. Tu, T., Lambert, C., Navin Shah, J., Westwood, P., Bryson C., Purdon, S., Mallender, J., Bertranou, E., Jhita T. e Roberts, S. 2013 Evaluation of the Right to Control Trailblazers: Synthesis Report, London, Office for Disability Issues.
  124. Ungerson, C. e Yeandle, S. (a cura di) 2007 Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States, Palgrave, Macmillan.
  125. Wanless, D. 2006 Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-Term View, London, King’s Fund.
  126. Waterplas, L. e Samoy, E. 2005 L’allocation personnalisée: le cas de la Suède, du Royaume-Uni, des Pays-Bas et de la Belgique, in «Revue française des affaires sociales», 2, pp. 61-101.
  127. Williams, V. 2006 The Views and Experiences of Direct Payments, in C. Pearson (a cura di), Direct Payments and Personalisation of Care, Edinburgh, Dunedin Academic Press.

Sarah Carr, in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 3/2013, pp. 79-109, DOI:10.3280/SP2013-003004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche