Click here to download

The object couple
Journal Title: PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 
Author/s: René Roussillon 
Year:  2014 Issue: 2 Language: Italian 
Pages:  12 Pg. 289-300 FullText PDF:  50 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PU2014-002005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The problem of the Oedipal organization is discussed from the viewpoint of the progressive structuring of a particular psychic object, the "object couple". This object is originally derived from the first representations of being in relationship with the mother, i.e., from a first "relational style". This first representation later becomes more complex when the father begins to be an object of desire from the mother, and the child progressively organizes his schemas from "schemas of being with the object" to "schemas of being with an object who is with another object". The child later will continue the construction of the "object couple" in his experiences where he will be able to be "alone with his libidinal drive in the presence of the couple". The Oedipal situation will be constructed according to different types of libidinal organizations that will appear in the course of development.
Keywords: Oedipus, couple, schemas of "being with", narcissistic ideal, libidinal organization

  1. Anzieu D. (1987). Les signifiants formels et le moi-peau. In: Anzieu et al., Les enveloppes psychiques. Paris: Dunod, 1996 (trad. it.: I significanti formali e l’Io-pelle. In: Anzieu et al., Gli involucri psichici. Milano: Dunod-Masson, 1997).
  2. Aulagnier P. (1975). La violence de l’interpretation. Paris: PUF (trad. it.: La violenza dell’interpretazione. Dal pittogramma all’enunciato. Roma: Borla, 1994).
  3. Bollas C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia University Press (trad. it.: L’ombra dell’oggetto: psicoanalisi del conosciuto non pensato. Roma: Borla, 1989).
  4. Bourguignon O., editor (1999). Le fraternel. Paris: Dunod.
  5. Deleuze G. & Guattari F. (1971). L’Anti-Oedipe. Paris: Éditions De Minuit (trad. it.: L’anti-Edipo. Capitalismo e schizofrenia. Torino: Einaudi 1975).
  6. Donnet J.L. (1976). On parle d’un enfant. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 40, 4: 733-739.
  7. Donnet J-L. & Green A. (1973). L’enfant de ça. Psychanalyse d’un entretien: la psychose blanche. Paris: Éditions de Minuit (trad. it.: La psicosi bianca. Roma: Borla, 1992).
  8. Dornes M. (2002). Psychanalyse et psychologie du premier âge. Paris: PUF.
  9. Fivaz-Depeursinge E. & Corboz-Warnery A. (1999). The Primary Triangle. A Development System View of Mothers, Fathers and Infants. New York: Basic Books (tra. it.: Il triangolo primario: le prime interazioni triadiche tra padre, madre e bambino. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2000).
  10. Freud S. (1914 [1918]). Dalla storia di una nevrosi infantile (Caso clinico dell’Uomo dei lupi). Opere, 7: 483-593. Torino: Boringhieri, 1975.
  11. Freud S. (1915-17 [1916-17]). Introduzione alla psicoanalisi. Opere, 8: 191-611. Torino: Boringhieri, 1976.
  12. Freud S. (1921). Psicologia delle masse e analisi dell’Io. Opere, 9: 259-330. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  13. Jaïtin R. (2006). Clinique de l’inceste fraternel. Paris: Dunod.
  14. Lacan J. (1955-56). Le Seminaire, Livre 3: Les Psychoses. Paris: Seuil, 1981 (trad. it.: Il Seminario. Libro III. Le psicosi. Torino: Einaudi, 1985).
  15. Perrault C. (1697). Le Petit Poucet (trad. it.: Pollicino. In: I racconti di mamma l’oca. Torino: Einaudi, 1957).
  16. Rochat P. (2006). Le monde des bébés. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  17. Rosolato G. (1985). Le signifiant de démarcation et la communication non verbale. In: Eléments de l'interprétation. Paris, Gallimard, 1985, pp. 63-82.
  18. Roussillon R. (1995). Logiques et archéologiques du cadre psychanalytique. Paris: PUF (trad. it.: Il setting psicoanalitico. Roma: Borla, 1997).
  19. Roussillon R. (2002). La capacité d’être seul en présence du couple. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, LXVI, 1 (“Familles d’aujourd’hui”): 9-20., DOI: 10.3917/rfp.661.0009.Anchein:Roussillon,2008,cap.11,pp.225-240
  20. Roussillon R. (2004). La dépendance primitive et l’homosexualité primaire “en double”. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, LXVIII, 2: 421-439. Roussillon R. (2008). Le jeu et l’entre je(u). Paris: PUF.
  21. Stern D.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books (trad. it.: Il mondo interpersonale del bambino. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1987).
  22. Varela F. (1989). Connâitre les sciences cognitive. Paris: Seuil (trad. it.: Neurofenomenologia. Un rimedio metodologico al “problema difficile”. In: Cappuccio M., a cura di, Neurofenomenologia. Le scienze della mente e la sfida dell’esperienza cosciente. Milano: Bruno Mondadori, 2006).
  23. Vincent J.D. (1986). Biologie des passions. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  24. Winnicott D.W. (1957). The capacity to be alone. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1958, 39: 416-420. Anche in: The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment [1957-63]. New York: International Universities Press, 1965 (trad. it.: La capacità di essere solo. In: Sviluppo affettivo e ambiente. Roma: Armando, 1970).

René Roussillon, The object couple in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 2/2014, pp. 289-300, DOI:10.3280/PU2014-002005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content