Clicca qui per scaricare

Logiche di accountability e riforme del sistema universitario. Una discussione e una proposta
Titolo Rivista: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Autori/Curatori: Andrea Vargiu 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: 59 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  19 P. 59-77 Dimensione file:  508 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2014-059004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The intense reform process that invests the Italian higher education and scientific research system is hereby considered in the light of the concept of accountability. Within that framework, the paper addresses the definition of accountability along with the associated principles of transparency, responsibility and responsiveness. The different logics and forms of accountability are thereafter discussed by highlighting the difficulties which arise with respect to the necessary link between accountability rhetoric and organizational models. The author argues that the present situation of widespread discomfort within Italian universities is related to the disconnection between prevailing types of accountability and sense of the reform process. The paper ends by proposing the concept of social accountability as a possible way to be explored in order to overcome the difficulties highlighted in the previous paragraphs. The principle is briefly presented. Some considerations are introduced as to its potentials but also as to some possible limitations


Keywords: Accountability; University; Autonomy; Responsibility; Social Accountability.

  1. Manin B., Przeworski A. e Stokes S. (1999). Introduction. In Przeworski A., Stokes S. e
  2. Manin B., editors, Democracy, Accountability and Representation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Wrigley T. (2003). Is ‘School Effectiveness’ Anti-Democratic?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 51: 89-112., DOI: 10.1111/1467-8527.t01-4-00228
  4. Ackerman J.M. (2005). Social Accountability in the Public Sector. A Conceptual Discussion. Social Development Papers, 82. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Testo disponibile al sito: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPCENG/214574-
  5. 1116506074750/20542263/FINALAckerman.pdf, consultato il 14 luglio 2014.
  6. Boelen C, Woollard B. (2009). Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Medical Education, 43: 887-894., DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.
  7. Bovens M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility: Accounting and Citizenship in Complex Organizations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Clark D. (2002). Neoliberalism and Public Service Reform: Canada in Comparative Perspective. Canada Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 35, 4: 771-793., DOI: 10.1017/S0008423902778438
  9. Clarke M., Missingham B. (2009). Guest Editor’s introduction: Active citizenship and social accountability. Development in Practice, 19, 8: 955-963., DOI: 10.1080/09614520903233571
  10. EC (2013). Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society; EUR25766 EN
  11. Epstein D. (1993). Defining Accountability in Education. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 3: 243-257., DOI: 10.1080/0141192930190303FoxJ.(2007).Theuncertainrelationshipbetweentransparencyandaccountability.DevelopmentinPractice,17,4-5:663-671.DOI:10.1080/09614520701469955
  12. Gaventa J. (2002). Introduction: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability. IDS Bulletin, 3, 2, testo disponibile al sito: https://www.ids.ac.uk/idspublication/introduction-exploring-citizenship-participationand-accountability, consultato il 14 luglio 2014.
  13. Gilbert U., Rasche A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 2: 187-216., DOI: 10.5840/beq200717230
  14. Goetz A.M., Gaventa J. (2001). Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery. IDS Working Paper n° 138. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, testo disponibile al sito: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/Wp138.pdf, consultato il 14 luglio 2014.
  15. Kogan M. (1988). Educational Accountability: An Analytic Overview, London: Hutchinson.
  16. Lane L.M. (1994). Old Failures and New Opportunities: Public Sector Performance Management. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 14: 26-44., DOI: 10.1177/0734371X9401400303
  17. Laufer W.S. (2003). Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 3: 253-261., DOI: 10.1023/A:1022962719299
  18. Malena C. Forster R., Singh J. (2004). Social Accountability. An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging Practice, Social Development Papers, 76, Washington, DC: World Bank, testo disponibile al sito: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/114524/SAc%20paper.pdf, consultato il 14 luglio 2014.
  19. Means (1999). Evaluating Socio-Economic Programmes, Vol. 6: Glossary of 300 concepts and technical terms. Luxembourg: European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  20. Merler A. (1996). Le isole nei percorsi di autonomia e di autogoverno. In Merler A., M.L. Piga, Regolazione sociale insularità percorsi di sviluppo. Sassari: Edes:. 21-116.
  21. Mulgan R. (2000). Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept?. Public Administration, 78, 3: 555-573., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.0021
  22. Olsen J.P. (1988). Administrative Reform and Theories of Organization. In Campbell C. e Peters B.G., editors, Organizing Governance: Governing Organizations. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
  23. Owen R., Macnaghten P., Stilgoe J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 6: 751-760., DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs09
  24. Palumbo M., Congiu D. (2009). Partecipazione e valutazione per il Piano Regolatore Sociale. In Palumbo M., Torrigiani C., curatori, La partecipazione tra ricerca e valutazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 37-72.
  25. Palumbo M., Torrigiani C., a cura di (2013). La partecipazione tra ricerca e valutazione.
  26. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  27. Paul S. (1992). Accountability in Public Services: Exit, Voice and Control. World Development, 20, 7: 1047-1060., DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90130-N
  28. Pellizzoni L. (2005). Cosa significa partecipare. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 46, 3: 479-511., DOI: 10.1423/20432
  29. Peruzzotti E. Sulovitz C. (2006). Social Accountability. An Introduction. In Peruzzotti E.,
  30. Smulovitz C., Enforcing the rule of law: social accountability in the new Latin American
  31. democracies. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh: 3-33. Reale E., Pennisi C. (2013). La valutazione dell’Università e della ricerca in Italia: stato dell’arte e prospettive. In Vergani A., curatore, Prove di valutazione. Libro Bianco della valutazione in Italia. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 23-62.
  32. Romzek B. (2000). Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in an Era of Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 21: 21-44., DOI: 10.1177/0020852300661004
  33. Schledler A. (1999). Conceptualizing Accountability. In Schledler A., Diamond L. e Plattner M., editors, The Self-Restricting State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boluder, CO: Lynne Reinmer: 13-28.
  34. Tomei G. (2010). Valutazione, cittadinanza, partecipazione. Le ragioni di un numero monografico. Rivista trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 54, 1., DOI: 10.3280/SA2010-001001
  35. van Vught S.A. (1994). Autonomy and Accountability in Government/University Relationship. In Salmi J., Verspoor A.M., editors, Revitalizing Higher Education. Oxford: IAU Press by Pergamon.
  36. Vargiu A. (2012). La ricerca sociologica tra valutazione e impegno civico. Saggi sulla crisi e l’università nelle società delle conoscenze. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  37. Vargiu A. (2014). Indicators for the Evaluation of Public Engagement of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5, 1.
  38. Vergani A. (2013). Introduzione. In Vergani A., curatore, Prove di valutazione. Libro Bianco della valutazione in Italia. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 11-21.
  39. Walker D.W. (2009). Citizen-Driven Reform of Local-Level Basic Services: Community-Based Performance Monitoring. Development in Practice, 19, 8: 1035-1051., DOI: 10.1080/09614520903220792

Andrea Vargiu, in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 59/2014, pp. 59-77, DOI:10.3280/RIV2014-059004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche