Tipos de comunicación en una comunidad colaborativa virtual de futuros docentes

Titolo Rivista: CADMO
Autori/Curatori: Elba Gutiérrez-Santiuste, María-Jesús Gallego-Arrufat
Anno di pubblicazione: 2015 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 16 P. 65-80 Dimensione file: 88 KB
DOI: 10.3280/CAD2015-002007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Communication is studied in a virtual collaborative community of future teachers. The participants collaborate in a virtual learning environment in higher education. The main theme of this article is computer-mediated communication and the analysis of the three most used communication tools (chats, forums and emails). The different types of communication (social presence, cognitive presence, teaching presence) and the perception of the future teacher on them are exposed in the article. The results show differences in the elements analyzed for the communication tool which is used. The analysis of communication in virtual collaborative environments is a promising line of research to contribute improving the initial training of teachers and therefore improving education.

  1. Akayoğlu, S., Altun, A., Stevens, V. (2009). “Social Presence in Synchronous Textbased Computer-mediated Communication”, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, pp. 1-16.
  2. Akyol, Z., Garrison, D.R., Ozden, M.Y. (2009), “Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences, International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 10 (6), pp. 65-83.
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W. (2001), “Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (2), pp. 1-17.
  4. Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., Swan, K.P. (2008), “Developing a Community of Inquiry Instrument: Testing a Measure of the Community of Inquiry Framework Using a Multi-institutional Sample”, Internet and Higher Education, 11 (3-4), pp. 133-136.
  5. Bruzzone, D. (2002), Il dialogo. Apprendimento e insegnamento. Saggi sul metodo. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  6. Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D.R., Kinsel, E. (2007), “Role Adjustment for Learners in an Online Community of Inquiry: Identifying the Needs of Novice Online Learners”, International Journal of Web-based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2 (1), pp. 1-16.
  7. Conrad, D. (2005), “Building and Maintaining Community in Cohort-based Online Learning”, Journal of Distance Education, 20 (1), pp. 1-20.
  8. DeNoyelles, A., Zydney, J.M., Chen, B. (2014), “Strategies for Creating a Community of Inquiry thorough Online Asynchronous Discussions”, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10 (1), pp. 153-165.
  9. Diaz, S.R., Swan, K., Ice, P., Kupczynski, L. (2010), “Student Ratings of the Importance of Survey Items, Multiplicative Factor Analysis, and the Validity of the Community of Inquiry Survey”, Internet and Higher Education, 13 (1-2), pp. 22-30.
  10. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. (2003), E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework of Research and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
  11. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2000), “Critical Inquiry in a Text-based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education”, Internet and Higher Education, 11 (2), pp. 1-14.
  12. Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2012), Comunicación en Entornos Virtuales de Formación: Estudio de la Interacción Didáctica en Diversas Modalidades de Enseñanzaaprendizaje en Educación Superior, Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Granada, España y Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italia.
  13. Hrastinski, S., Keller, C., Carlsson, S.A. (2010), “Design Exemplars For Synchronous E-learning: A Design Theory a Design Theory Approach”, Computers & Education, 55 (2), pp. 652-662.
  14. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., Ludgate, H. (2013), NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher education edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.
  15. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Holubec, E. (1999), El aprendizaje colaborativo en el aula. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
  16. Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., Laflamme, E. (2007), “The Influence of Instructional Methods on the Quality of Online Discussion”, British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (2), pp. 260-271.
  17. Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., Wiesenmayer, R., McCluskey, F. (2010), “Student Perceptions of the Relationship Between Indicators of Teaching Presence and Success in Online Courses”, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9 (1), pp. 23-43.
  18. Meyer, K.A. (2004), “Evaluating Online Discussions: Four Different Frames of Analysys”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8 (2), pp. 101-114.
  19. Muuro, M.E., Wagacha, W.P., Oboko, R., Kihoro, J. (2014), “Student’ Perceived Challenges in an Online Collaborative Learning Environment: A Case of Higher Learning Institutions in Nairobi, Kenya”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15 (6), 132-159.
  20. Park, C.L. (2009), “Replicating the Use of a Cognitive Presence Measurement Tool”, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8 (2), pp. 140-155.
  21. Pawan, F., Paulus, T.M., Yalcin, S., Chang, C.F. (2003), “Online Learning: Patterns of Engagement and Interaction amongst In-service Teachers”, Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), pp. 119-140.
  22. Picciano, A.G. (2002). “Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6 (1), pp. 21-40.
  23. Remesal, A., Colomina, R. (2013), “Social Presence and Online Collaborative Small Group Work: A Socioconstructivist Account”. Computers & Education, 60 (1), pp. 357-367.
  24. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J. (2010), “Online Instructional Effort Measured through the Lens of Teaching Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework: A Reexamination of Measures and Approach”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11 (3), pp. 127-154.
  25. Simone, A. (2010), Apprendimento permanente e didattica on line. Nápoles: Liguori.
  26. Sins, P.H., Savelsbergh, E., Joolingen, W., Hout-Wolters, B. (2010), “Effects of Faceto-face versus Chat Communication on Performance in Collaborative Inquiry Modeling Task”, Computers & Education, 56 (2), pp. 379-387.
  27. So, H.J., Brush, T.A. (2008), “Students Perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment: Relationships and Critical Factors”, Computers & Education, 51 (1), pp. 318-336.
  28. Stein, D.S., Wanstreet, C.E., Glazer, H.R., Engle, C.L., Harris, R.A., Johnston, S.M., Simons, M.R., Trinko, L.A. (2007), “Creating Shared Understanding through Chats in a Community of Inquiry”, The Internet and Higher Education, 10 (2), pp. 103-115.
  29. Traphagan, T.W., Chiang Y.V., Chang, H.M., Wattanawaha, B., Lee, H., Mayrath, M.C., Woo, J., Jee, M.J., Resta, P.E. (2010), “Cognitive, Social and Teaching Presence in a Virtual World and a Text Chat”, Computers & Education, 55 (3), pp. 923-936.
  30. Triani, P. (2002), L’apprendimento e insegnamento. Saggi sul método. Milano: V&P Università.
  31. Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R.D., Hsia, T.L. (2010), “A Study of Student Satisfaction in a Blended e-learning System Environment”, Computers & Education, 55 (1), pp. 155-164.
  32. Zydney, J.M., DeNoyelles, A., Kyeong-Ju, K. (2012), “Creating a Community of Inquiry in Online Environments: An Exploratory Study on the Effects of a Protocol on Interactions within Asynchronous Discussions”, Computers & Education, 58 (1), pp. 77-87.

  • Las competencias del profesorado de educación física. Un estudio del modelo formativo José Luis Aparicio-Herguedas, Jairo Rodríguez-Medina, Antonio Fraile-Aranda, in CADMO 2/2022 pp.21
    DOI: 10.3280/CAD2021-002003

Elba Gutiérrez-Santiuste, María-Jesús Gallego-Arrufat, Tipos de comunicación en una comunidad colaborativa virtual de futuros docentes in "CADMO" 2/2015, pp 65-80, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2015-002007