Through social values to the reinterpretation of sociology’s ethical neutrality

Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori: Elzbieta Halas
Anno di pubblicazione: 2016 Fascicolo: 1 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 13 P. 67-79 Dimensione file: 116 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SP2016-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The relationships between ethics and sociology are analyzed in the field of social values. The aim is to avoid the conflation of sociology and ethics, since it is being assumed that a truly sociological perspective is non-normative. In contemporary discussions regarding values, the viewpoint is frequently limited to moral values, while insufficient attention is given to the category of social values, which are primarily persons in their active experience of relations. The problematic relationship between sociology and ethics is discussed, following Florian Znaniecki’s classic question whether sociologists should also be philosophers of values. Contemporary culture has become problematic for itself with growing uncertainty as to values, their ambiguity and conflicts. The relationship between sociology and ethics should be reconsidered, as shown on the example of human rights, which have long stayed outside sociology’s scope of interests, remaining a specialty of philosophers and law theorists. Since sociology should not remain neutral in regard to human rights, this issue illustrates the limits of sociology’s ethical neutrality.

  1. Adler, M. J. (eds.) 1952. The Great Ideas. A Sinopticon of Great Books in the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
  2. Archer, M. S. 1990. Theory, Culture and Post-Industrial Society, in Featherstone M. (eds). Global Culture. Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity, London: Sage, pp. 97-119.
  3. — 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. — 2013. Człowieczeństwo. Problem sprawstwa [Being Human: the Problem of Agency, 2000], transl. A. Dziuban, Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.
  5. — 2015. The Relational Subject and the Person: Self, Agent and Actor, in Donati P. - Archer, M. S., The Relational Subject, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85-122.
  6. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Questions de sociologie. Paris: Les Édition de Minuit.
  7. Donati, P. 2011. Relational Sociology. A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
  8. Elias, N. 1998. Involvement and Detachment, in Goudsblom J., Mennell, S. (eds). The Norbert Elias Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 84-91
  9. Frezzo, M. 2012. Introduction. In J. Blau, M. Frezzo. eds. Sociology and Human Rights. A Bill of Rights for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 3-14. Los Angeles: Sage.
  10. Giddens, A. 1976. The New Rules of Sociological Method. A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
  11. Hałas, E. 1991. Images of Man in Symbolic Interactionism and the Problem of Homo Aestimans, The Polish Sociological Bulletin, (1), pp. 51-61.
  12. — 2002. Ethical Dilemmas of Verstehen in Sociology. Theodore Abel’s Encounter with Nazism, Polish Sociological Review, (2), pp. 173-187.
  13. — 2010. Towards the World Culture Society. Florian Znaniecki’s Culturalism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  14. Helle, H. J., 1987. Soziologie als Ethik? Das Problem des Sollens in den Sozialwissenschaften; Sociologia come etica? Il problema del dovere nelle science sociali del nostro tempo. Annali di Sociologia/Soziologisches Jahrbuch 2 (II), pp. 11-29; 30-48.
  15. — 2001. Georg Simmel: Introduction to his Theory and Method. München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.
  16. Joas, H. 2009. Powstawanie wartości [Die Enstehung der Werte, 1998], transl. M. Kaczmarczyk. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
  17. — 2013. The Sacredness of the Person. A New Genealogy of Human Rights. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University.
  18. Judycki, S. 2010. Bóg i inne osoby. Próba z zakresu teologii filozoficznej [God and Other Persons. An Essay in Philosophical Theology]. Poznań: W drodze.
  19. Lacey, H. 2005. Value Neutrality in Science, in Kaldis, B. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Social Sciences, vol. II, London: Sage, pp. 1033-1036.
  20. Sinko, T. 1960. Od filantropii do humanitaryzmu i humanizmu [From philantropy to humanitarism and humanism], Warszawa: PAX.
  21. Skidmore, W. L. 1975. Sociology’s Models of Man: Relationship of Models of Man to Sociological Explanation in Three Sociological Theories. New York: Gordon and Breath.
  22. Spencer, H. 1892. The Principles of Ethics. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
  23. Turner, B. S. 2006. Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  24. — 2012. The Rights of Age: On Human Vulnerability, in Blau J., Frezzo, M. (eds.) Sociology and Human Rights. A Bill of Rights for the Twenty-First Century, Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 201-221.
  25. — 2001. Role Theory, in Turner J. H., Handbook of Sociological Theory, New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 233-254.
  26. Weber, M. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences, transl. and eds. by Shils, E. A., and Finch, H. A., New York: The Free Press.
  27. White, H. C. 2008. Identity and Control. How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  28. Znaniecki, F. 1934. The Method of Sociology. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
  29. — 1952. Should Sociologists Be Also Philosophers of Values? Sociology and Social Research, 37 (2), pp. 79-84.
  30. — 1965. Social Relations and Social Roles. The Unfinished Systematic Sociology, San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
  31. — 1986. The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge. New Brunswick: Transaction Books (first edition 1940).

  • Handbuch Kultursoziologie Elżbieta Hałas, pp.217 (ISBN:978-3-658-07615-3)
  • Quelle sociologie relationnelle? Une perspective non relationniste Pierpaolo Donati, in Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales /2018 pp.325
    DOI: 10.7202/1044020ar
  • Handbuch Kultursoziologie Elżbieta Hałas, pp.1 (ISBN:978-3-658-08000-6)

Elzbieta Halas, Through social values to the reinterpretation of sociology’s ethical neutrality in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2016, pp 67-79, DOI: 10.3280/SP2016-001004