Clicca qui per scaricare

Circular wastescapes. Waste as a resource for periurban landscapes planning
Titolo Rivista: CRIOS 
Autori/Curatori: Libera Amenta, Anna Attademo 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 12 Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  10 P. 79-88 Dimensione file:  1701 KB
DOI:  10.3280/CRIOS2016-012008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




The alarming data on the consumption of resources, waste production and the inability of ecosystems to absorb and metabolize them, necessitate a rethinking of the role of waste in traditional planning instruments. The research work adopts Circular Metabolism as a model, proposes to revert the perspective on waste management, towards Circular Economies to preserve the life of ecosystems, adding value at the local level. In this sense, the Living Labs seem to be an innovative instrument for urban planning, which is capable of merging the skills of researchers and policy makers together with the involvement of local communities.

  1. Allen A., Broto V. C. and Rapoport E. (2012). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Urban Metabolism: a review of the literature. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(6), 851-861.
  2. Berger A. (2006). Drosscape. In Waldheim C., edited by, The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  3. Berger A. (2009). Systemic Design Can Change The World. Netherlands: SUN Architecture.
  4. Brugmans G., van Dinteren J. and Hajer M., edited by (2016). The Next Economy: 7th International Architecture Biennale Rotterdam. Rotterdam: IABR Publication.
  5. Castells M. (2010). Globalisation, Networking, Urbanisation: reflections on the Spatial Dynamics of the Information Age. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2737-2745.
  6. Choay F. (1992). L’orizzonte del post urbano. Roma: Officina Edizioni.
  7. Clementi A. (2013). Urbanistica sostenibile e gestione dei rifiuti. Piano Progetto Città, 27-28: 52-63.
  8. Donadieu P. (1998). Campagnes urbaines. Arles-Versailles: Actes Sud / E.N.S.P.
  9. EC (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the Europian Union, L13, 3-30.
  10. EC (2011a). "A resource-efficient Europe – Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy", Report of the European Commission.
  11. EC (2011b). "EC Communication: Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe", Report of the European Commission.
  12. EC (2014). "Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe", Report of the European Commission.
  13. EEA (2015). "Waste prevention: where do European countries stand?" Report of the European Environment Agency.
  14. Forman R. T. T. (2008). Urban Regions: Ecology and Planning Beyond the City: Cambridge Studies in Landscape Ecology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Formato E. and Russo M. (2014). Re-Use/Re-Cycle Territories: a retroactive conceptualisation for East Naples. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, Special Issue, 431-440.
  16. Ganapini W. (2013). Il rifiuto come risorsa. Piano Progetto Città, 27-28, 42-51.
  17. Ghosn R. and Jazairy E. H. (2015). Geographies of Trash. New York: Actar.
  18. Girardet H. (2008). Cities, People, Planet: Urban Development and Climate Change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  19. Golubiewski N. (2012). Is There a Metabolism of an Urban Ecosystem? An Ecological Critique. AMBIO, 41(7), 751-764.
  20. Ibañez D. and Katsikis N. (2014). New Geographies 06. Grounding Metabolism, 2-10.
  21. Kennedy C., Cuddihy J. and Engel-Yan J. (2007). The Changing Metabolism of Cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43-59.
  22. Ley D. (1996). The New Middle Classes and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Lynch K. (1990). Wasting away. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. McDonough W. and Braungart M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.
  24. Minx J., Creutzig F., Medinger V., Ziegler T., Owen A.
  25. and Baiocchi G. (2011). Developing a Pragamatic Approach to Assess Urban Metabolism in Europe, Report to the European Environment Agency.
  26. Mitchell W. J. (2003). Me++ : the cyborg self and the networked city. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  27. Mullainathan S. and Shafir E. (2013). Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York: Henry Holt & Company LLC.
  28. Newman P. W. G. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Extending the metabolism model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4), 219-226.
  29. Nilsson K., Pauleit S., Bell S., Aalbers C. and Sick Nielsen T. A. (2013). Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
  30. Oswalt P., Rieniets T., Schirmel H., 1Kilo and Bundes. K. des. (2006). Atlas of shrinking cities. Atlas Der Schrumpfenden Städte. Berlin: Hatje Cantz.
  31. Palestino M. F. (2013). Interpretazioni della postmetropoli napoletana in chiave di resilienza. PLANUM - Atti Della XVI Conferenza Nazionale SIU - Società Italiana Degli Urbanisti. Urbanistica per una diversa crescita. Aporie dello sviluppo, uscita dalla crisi e progetto del territorio contemporaneo, 9-10 Maggio 2013, 2(27).
  32. Palestino M. F. (2015). Per un’agenda radicale della Terra dei Fuochi. CRIOS Critica Degli Ordinamenti Spaziali, 10.
  33. Pavia R. (2016). Compost city. CRIOS Critica Degli Ordinamenti Spaziali, 11, 9-20.
  34. Pincetl S., Bunje P. and Holmes T. (2012). An expanded urban metabolism method: toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 193-202.
  35. Russo M. (2012). L’esperienza come progetto: conoscere l’area est di Napoli. In: Lucci R. and Russo M., a cura di, Napoli verso oriente. Naples: Clean.
  36. Secchi B. (2000). Prima lezione di urbanistica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  37. Secchi B. (2005). La città del ventesimo secolo. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  38. Smith N. (2012). New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427-450.
  39. Soja E. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  40. Swyngedouw E. (2006). Metabolic urbanization. In: Heynen N., Kaika M. and Swyngedouw E. (eds.), In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism (Questioning Cities). New York: Routledge.
  41. Timmeren A., van Henriquez L. and Reynolds A. (2015). Ubikquity and the illuminated city. From smart to intelligent Urban Environments. Delft: TU Delft.
  42. Turner V. (1982). From ritual to theatre: the human seriousness of play. Performing Art Journal Publications. New York: PAJ Publications.
  43. Unmüßig B. and Töpfer K. (2015). Introduction. In Chemnitz C. and Weigelt J., editors, Soil Atlas. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
  44. Voskamp I. M., Stremke S., Spiller M., Perrotti D., Hoek J. P. van der and Rijnaarts M. H. H. (2016). Enhanced Performance of the Eurostat Method for Comprehensive Assessment of Urban Metabolism: a Material Flow Analysis of Amsterdam. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 1-16.



  1. Libera Amenta, Arjan van Timmeren, Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of Wastescapes in Sustainability /2018 pp. 4740, DOI: 10.3390/su10124740
  2. Enrico Formato, Anna Attademo, No.Wall:S. Un progetto di rigenerazione, per l'ospitalità e la condivisione in TERRITORIO 82/2017 pp. 129, DOI: 10.3280/TR2017-082023
  3. Libera Amenta, Anna Attademo, Hilde Remøy, Gilda Berruti, Maria Cerreta, Enrico Formato, Maria Federica Palestino, Michelangelo Russo, Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach in Urban Planning /2019 pp. 5, DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i3.2170

Libera Amenta, Anna Attademo, in "CRIOS" 12/2016, pp. 79-88, DOI:10.3280/CRIOS2016-012008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche