Click here to download

La presa in carico dei pazienti cronici in Lombardia: quale governance e quali indeterminatezze nel modello
Journal Title: MECOSAN 
Author/s: Elisabetta Barzan, Francesco Longo, Francesco Petracca, Valeria Domenica Tozzi 
Year:  2017 Issue: 103 Language: Italian 
Pages:  18 Pg. 31-48 FullText PDF:  23671 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MESA2017-103003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The local healthcare system of Lombardy, in the North of Italy, has recently introduced some relevant policies aimed at innovating the institutional and organizational framework of its health and care services and addressing chronic disease management. However, the final organizational arrangement of the Lombardy chronic care model will depend on the involvement of local primary care actors, the role played by public and private healthcare organizations and the collaborative relationships/interactions among the actors involved. The aim of this work is to describe the main undetermined dimensions of the model, to analyse the main institutional and organizational challenges related to the reform and to suggest policy recommendations. This could help policy makers implement the targeted measures needed to solve these rising issues.
Keywords: Policy implementation, network, chronic care, governance, organizational framework, chronic disease management.

  1. Airoldi G. (1996). Assetti istituzionali e assetti organizzativi. In: Costa G., Nacamulli R. C. D. (a cura di). Manuale di organizzazione aziendale. Torino: Utet.
  2. Anessi Pessina E., Cantù E. (2012). Il modello di analisi, l’impostazione del Rapporto e i principali risultati. In: CeRGAS (a cura di). Rapporto OASI 2012. Milano: EGEA.
  3. Berwick D. M., Nolan T. W., & Whittington J. (2008). The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health affairs, 27(3): 759-769.
  4. Brown T. L., & Potoski M. (2003). Contract–management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2): 153-164.
  5. Cunningham F. C., Ranmuthugala G., Plumb J., Georgiou A., Westbrook J. I., & Braithwaite J. (2012). Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf, 21(3): 239-249.
  6. Dawda P., Jenkins R., & Varnam R. (2010). Quality improvement in general practice. London: The King’s Fund, 30.
  7. Del Vecchio M. (2012). Sanita, modelli e logiche di governo. In: Settore, Sistema e Azienda. Milano: Egea.
  8. Del Vecchio M. (2014). Institutional frameworks, organizational boundaries and managerial problems in the Italian National Health Service. Social Policies, 1(3): 437-452.
  9. Fait A., Agnello M., Scire C., Merlino L., Schiatti S., Mazzone A., Bergamaschi W. (2015). Improvements in care co-ordination of chronic patients associated with a new primary care payment system in Lombardy: updated results of the CreG (Chronic Related Group) model. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP 2015). Milano: Edward Elgar.
  10. Fotaki M. (2013). Is patient choice the future of health care systems? International journal of health policy and management, 1(2): 121-123.
  11. Kelly C., Hulme C., Farragher T., & Clarke G. (2016). Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review. BMJ open, 6(11): e013059.
  12. Ministero della Salute (2016). Annuario Statistico 2013.
  13. Nolte E., & Knai C. (a cura di) (2015). “Assessing chronic disease management in European health systems. Country reports”. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Morando V., Tozzi V. (2015). Population health management e PDTA: “prove tecniche di implementazione”. In: CeRGAS (a cura di). Rapporto OASI 2015. Milano: EGEA.
  14. Petracca F., Ricci A. (2017). Gli ospedali privati accreditati: struttura, attivita e attrazione di mobilita interregionale. In: CeRGAS (a cura di). Rapporto OASI 2017. Milano: EGEA.
  15. Petracca F., Ricci A. (2016). I CReG lombardi: stato dell’arte e risultati preliminari. In: CeRGAS (a cura di). Rapporto OASI 2016. Milano: EGEA.
  16. Rhodes R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political studies, 44(4): 652-667.
  17. Saltman R. B., Ferroussier-Davis O. (2000). The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(6): 732-739.
  18. Tsiachristas A., Dikkers C., Boland M. R., & Rutten-van Molken M. P. (2013). Exploring payment schemes used to promote integrated chronic care in Europe. Health Policy, 113(3): 296-304.
  19. Victoor A., Delnoij D. M., Friele R. D., & Rademakers J. J. (2012). Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review. BMC health services research, 12(1): 272., DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-272
  20. Williams J., Rossiter A. (2004). Choice: the evidence. The operation of choice systems in practice: national and international evidence. London: The Social Market Foundation.

Elisabetta Barzan, Francesco Longo, Francesco Petracca, Valeria Domenica Tozzi, in "MECOSAN" 103/2017, pp. 31-48, DOI:10.3280/MESA2017-103003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content