Click here to download

Eudaimonic well-being and perceived self-efficacy on creative problem solving in young age
Author/s:  Manuela Zambianchi 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  17 Pg. 547-563 FullText PDF:  205 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2018-004001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Referring to models of young people’s positive development, the study analyzed the relationships between perceived self-efficacy on creative problem solving and eudaimonic well-being, defined as the actualizations of talents and potentials of the individual into the society (Ryff & Singer, 2008). 125 undergraduates coming from Rimini University Campus (m. age = 20.80; SD = 2.24) filled in the following questionnaires: PWB questionnaire on eudaimonic well-being (Ryff, 1989); questionnaire on the perceived efficacy on creative problem solving (Pastorelli et al., 2001). Results show that the presence of a high self-efficacy on creative problem solving constitutes a significant, positive predictor of eudaimonic well-being as global measure, as for the majority of its sub-components. Age on the contrary represents a negative predictor of eudaimonic well-being.
Keywords: Eudaimonic well-being, emerging adult, creativity, positive functioning.

  1. Leccardi, C. (2009). Sociologie del tempo. Bari: Laterza.
  2. Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in the Social Sciences: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York, NY: Harper.
  3. Moore, G., & Glei, M. (1995). Comparative Validity of two Measures of Self – efficacy in predicting Academic goals and Performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 516-529.
  4. O’Connor, M., Sanson, A., Hawkins, M., Primrose, L., Toumbourou, J., Smart, D., Vassallo, S., & Olsson, C. (2010). Predictors of Positive Development in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7, 860-874.
  5. OMS (1994). Life Skills education per bambini e adolescenti nelle scuole. Divisione di Salute Mentale, Ginevra.
  6. Pastorelli, C., Vecchio, G.M., & Boda, G. (2001). Autoefficacia nelle Life Skills: soluzione dei problemi e comunicazione interpersonale. In G.V. Caprara (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia, Trento: Erikson.
  7. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character Strenghts and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press and Washington, DC: APA.
  8. Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or it is? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
  9. Ryff, C.D., & Keyes, C.L.M. (2005). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
  10. Ryff, C.D., & Singer, B.H. (2008). Know thyself and become who you are. A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13-39. DOI 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.
  11. Ruini, C., Ottolini, F., Rafanelli, C., Ryff, C.D. & Fava, G.A. (2003). La validazione italiana delle Psychological Wellbeing Scales (PWB). Rivista di Psichiatria, 3, 117-129.
  12. Runco, M.A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75., DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
  13. Schulenberg, J.E., Bryant, A.L., & O’Malley, P.M. (2004). Taking hold of some kind of life: how developmental tasks relate to trajectories of well-being during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychopathology, 16(4), 1119-1140.
  14. Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2009). Coping with relationships stressors: a decade review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 196-210.
  15. Seligman, M., & Csikszentmilhanyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 1, 5-14., DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5
  16. Simonton, D.K. (2000). Creativity. Cognitive, Personal, Developmental, and Social Aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151-158., DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
  17. Steca, P., Ryff, C.D., D’Alessandro, S., & Delle Fratte, A. (2002). Il benessere psicologico. Differenze di genere e di età nel contesto italiano. Psicologia della Salute, 2, 121-143.
  18. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S.M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 6, 1137-1148.
  19. Torrance, E.P. (1976). Students of the future: Their abilities, achievements, and images of the future. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 1, 76-9.
  20. Torrance, E.P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in testing. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). The nature of creativity. Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge-New York-Sydney: Cambridge University.
  21. Wang, J., Farooq, U., & Carroll, J.M. (2013). Creative collective efficacy in scientific communities. In M. Lewkowicz et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of COOP 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work. London: Springer-Verlag.
  22. Zambianchi, M. (2015). La Psicologia Positiva. Roma: Carocci
  23. Amabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 10 (pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT., JAI Press.
  24. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  25. Aristotele (2000). Etica Nicomachea. Bompiani.
  26. Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologists, 55(5), 469-480, DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
  27. Arnett, J.J. (2015). Emerging Adulthood: the winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford. II edition.
  28. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  29. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
  30. Canestrari, R., & Godino, A. (1997). Trattato di Psicologia. Bologna: CLUEB.
  31. Caprara, G.V. (Ed.) (2001). La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Trento: Erickson.
  32. Cattell, R.B. (1963). Theory of fluid and cristallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 1-22.
  33. Cattell, R.B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. New York: Elsevier.
  34. Cinque, M. (2010). La creatività come innovazione personale: teorie e prospettive educative. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa 3, 95-113
  35. Conner, T.S., DeYoung, C.G., & Silvia, P.J. (2016). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-9., DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1257049
  36. Crocetti, E., & Palmonari, A. (2011). Sviluppi degli studi sull’adolescenza. In A. Palmonari (Ed.), Manuale di Psicologia dell’Adolescenza (pp. 45-41). Bologna: il Mulino.
  37. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  38. De Bono, E. (1969). Il pensiero laterale. Milano: Rizzoli.
  39. De Bono, E. (1991). Sei cappelli per pensare. Roma: BUR.
  40. Delle Fave, A. (2007). La condivisione del benessere. Il contributo della Psicologia Positiva. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  41. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. (2011).
  42. The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100, 185-207.
  43. Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
  44. Guilford, J.P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267-93.
  45. Kagan, C. (2012). La ricerca-azione partecipata e la psicologia di comunità. In B.
  46. Zani (Ed.), Psicologia di comunita. Prospettive, idee, metodi. Roma: Carocci.
  47. Keyes, C.L.M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207-222.
  48. Keyes, C.L.M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologists, 62(2), 95-108., DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95
  49. Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J.D., Abbott, R.D., Hill, K.G., Herrenkohl, T.I., & Catalano, R.F. (2005). Measures of positive adult behavior and their relationship to crime and substance use. Prevention Science, 6, 21-33.

Manuela Zambianchi, Eudaimonic well-being and perceived self-efficacy on creative problem solving in young age in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 4/2018, pp. 547-563, DOI:10.3280/RIP2018-004001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content