Click here to download

Peer review in the teacher education internship: From experience towards an integrated model
Author/s: Ettore Felisatti, Anna Serbati, Pietro Tonegato, Mariacristina Calogero, Gilberto Ferraro, Roberta Focchiatti, Laura Grigolato, Enrica Polato 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  11 Pg. 92-102 FullText PDF:  395 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EXI2019-001006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The paper presents the structure of the peer-review activities (Grion, Ser-bati, Tino, & Nicol, 2017) planned during the internship for Pre-service Teacher Education students at the University of Padova. These activities refer to the current a.a. 2018-2019 and will continue in the next academic years, too. Recent research on peer-review shows how this approach fosters students to take an active role in their learning, reflecting on their own assign-ments, reinforcing knowledge and skills, learning by sharing and compar-ing perspectives with peers at different levels, developing assessment and self-assessment skills (Nicol, 2013, 2014, 2018). In the initial development of the teacher’s professionality, the importance of writing - interpreted as an exercise for planning, documenting, reflect-ing - is emphasised, because it represents an opportunity for students to understand and elaborate a personal meaning related to the experience that they live in the school context. In a.a. 2017-2018 a first pilot project with 6 groups of students during their 4th and 5th-year was carried out, asking students to peer review in-ternship projects mutually. This experience confirmed the importance of reflective writing about the main aims of the internship. Fundamental elements to carry out peer-review activities for the intern-ship were then specified, defining purposes, structure and implementa-tion during the internship years. The procedure identified for 4th-year students includes: drafting an as-signment concerning the internship experience, reviewing peers’ work including one high-quality assignment exemplar, writing inner feedback after reviewing, participating to a final collective reflection, in order to update the personal assignment towards the final drafting and submis-sion.
Keywords: Peer-review, peer feedback, internship, assessment, self-assessment

  1. Bell, A., Mladenovic, R., & Price M. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of marking guides, grade descriptors and annotated exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 769-788., DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2012.714738
  2. Calogero, M., Ferraro, G., & Tonegato, P. (2018). Università e Scuola: temi e contesti del tirocinio per crescere insieme nella formazione e nella professione. In I. Bolognesi, & M. D’Ascenzo, (a cura di), Insegnanti si diventa. L'esperienza di Tirocinio nei corsi di laurea magistrale in Scienze della Formazione Primaria. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Cho, Y.H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629-643.
  4. Frigerio, A. (2004). La valutazione del tirocinio didattico. In E. Nigris, (a cura di), La formazione degli insegnanti. Percorsi, strumenti, valutazione. Roma: Carocci.
  5. Grion, V., & Serbati, A. (2017). (Edizione italiana a cura di), Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Nuove prospettive e pratiche di valutazione all’università. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
  6. Grion, V., Serbati, A., Tino, C., & Nicol, D. (2017). Ripensare la teoria della valutazione e dell’apprendimento all’università: un modello per implementare pratiche di peer review. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 19, 209-226. -- Tratto da
  7. Grion, V., & Tino, C. (2018). Verso una “valutazione sostenibile” all’università: percezioni di efficacia dei processi di dare e ricevere feedback fra pari. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 31, pp. 38-55.
  8. Laneve, C. (2009). Scrittura e pratica educativa. Un contributo al sapere dell’insegnamento. Trento: Erickson.
  9. Magnoler, P. (2008). L’insegnante professionista. Dispositivi per la formazione. Macerata: EUM.
  10. Mortari, L. (2003). Apprendere dall’esperienza. Il pensare riflessivo nella formazione. Roma: Carocci.
  11. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517., DOI: 10.1080/02602931003786559
  12. Nicol, D (2011). Developing students’ ability to construct feedback. QAA Scotland: Enhancement Themes. -- Tratto da
  13. Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and doing it well, pp. 34-49. Oxon: Routledge.
  14. Nicol, D. (2014). Guiding Principles for Peer Review: Unlocking Learners’ Evaluative Skills. In C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwhistle, & J. McArthur, Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback (pp. 197-224), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  15. Nicol, D. (2018). Unlocking generative feedback through peer reviewing. In V. Grion, & A. Serbati, (a cura di), Valutare l’apprendimento o valutare per l’apprendimento? Verso una cultura della valutazione sostenibile all’Università (pp. 47-59), Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  16. Perla, L. (2012). Scrittura e tirocinio universitario. Una ricerca sulla documentazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Ettore Felisatti, Anna Serbati, Pietro Tonegato, Mariacristina Calogero, Gilberto Ferraro, Roberta Focchiatti, Laura Grigolato, Enrica Polato, Peer review in the teacher education internship: From experience towards an integrated model in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2019, pp. 92-102, DOI:10.3280/EXI2019-001006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content