Click here to download

Un modello di valutazione del rischio per il Patrimonio Culturale
Journal Title: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Author/s: Federica Appiotti, Vanessa Assumma, Marta Bottero, Pierpaolo Campostrini, Giulia Datola, Enrico Rinaldi 
Year:  2018 Issue: 71-72 Language: Italian 
Pages:  28 Pg. 121-148 FullText PDF:  1017 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2018-071007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


As part of the European ResCult project, a Model has been prepared which provides a methodology for assessing the risk of immovable cultural heritage in relation to natural and man-made disastrous events, such as earthquakes, floods and fires. The Model is aimed at Institutions, Civil protection, experts, sector operators, as a fast and effective tool. Values that allow a detailed and concise view of the risk are assigned and calculated to indicators of hazard and vulnerability of the elements of the building and its context. The Model can be used before, during and after a disastrous event, to evaluate interventions in the prevention, emergency and reconstruction phases. In prevention, it can help determine the most vulnerable elements of the building and suggest where to act with preventive measures to reduce this vulnerability. During or immediately after the occurrence of an event, it can assist the Civil Protection and the operators in the priorities to be assigned to the interventions. After the event, it can help you develop an effective reconstruction strategy.
Keywords: Cultural Heritage; Risk; Model; Evaluation; Architecture; Disaster.

  1. Aitsi-Selmi A., Murray V. (2015). The Sendai framework: disaster risk reduction through a health lens, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Peer Reviewed 93 (6) 362., DOI: 10.2471/BLT.15.157362
  2. Barron F.H., Barrett B. (1996). The efficacy of SMARTER – Simple Multi – Attribute Rating Tecnique Extended to Ranking, Acta Psychologica, 93 (1-3) 23 – 26., DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8
  3. Bottero M, Ferretti V., Mondini G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15 (6) 644 – 655.
  4. Bottero M., Dell’Anna F., Nappo M. (2016). Evaluating Tangible and Intangible Aspects of Cultural Heritage: An Application of the PROMETHEE Method for the Reuse Project of the Ceva–Ormea Railway, Seminar of the Italian Society of Property Evaluation and Investment Decision, 285-295., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_23
  5. Edwards W., Barron F. Hutton (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 60, Issue 3, December 1994, pages 306-325.
  6. EUROCODICI per la progettazione strutturale (1990-2006). In particolare UNI EN 13501-1:2009 per l’incendio e UNI EN 1998 1/2/3/4/5/6 (2005-2009) per terremoto e alluvione. -- (https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/).
  7. Fais S., Casula G., Cuccuru F., Ligas P., Bianchi M. G. (2018). An innovative methodology for the non-destructive diagnosis of architectural elements of ancient historical buildings, Scientific Reports 8, 2018.
  8. Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys.
  9. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers., DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
  10. Ford R. M., Rawluk A., Williams K. J. H. (2019), Managing values in disaster planning: Current strategies, challenges and T opportunities for incorporating values of the public, Land Use Policy 81 131–142.
  11. Guanquan C., Jinhua S. (2008). Quantitative Assessment of Building Fire Risk to Life Safety, Risk Analysis 28 (3) 615 – 626.
  12. Holtorf, C. (2018). Embracing change : how cultural resilience is increased through cultural heritage. World archaeology 50., DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2018.1510340
  13. IDNDR (1994). Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for a Safer World, Guidelines for Natural Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Mitigation, World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction Yokohama, Japan.
  14. Kelman I., Gaillard JC., Mercer J. (2015). Climate changes role in disaster risk reduction’s future: beyound vulnerability and resilience, Int J Disaster Risk SCI 6: 21-27.
  15. Khan, N.A., Shafi, S. M., Ahangar H. (2010), Digitation of cultural heritage: Global initiatives, opportunities and challenges, Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 20 (4) 1 – 16., DOI: 10.4018/JCIT.2018100101
  16. Lagomarsino S., Ugolini P. (2005), Rischio sismico, territorio e centri storici. Atti del Convegno Nazionale Sanremo (IM), 2-3 luglio 2004. ISBN 9788846467386.
  17. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2008). NTC2008, Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. D. M. 14 gennaio 2008. Gazzetta.Ufficiale 4 febbraio 2008 n. 29 - S. O. n. 30. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2009). Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al D.M. 14 gennaio 2008. Circolare 2 febbraio 2009 n. 617 C.S.LL.PP. Gazzetta Ufficiale n.47 del 26 febbraio 2009 - S.O. n. 27.
  18. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2018). Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”. D.M. 17 gennaio 2018. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 42 del 20 febbraio 2018.
  19. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2019). Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’ “Aggiornamento delle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al D.M. 17 gennaio 2018. Circolare 21 gennaio 2019 n. 7 C.S.LL.PP. Gazzetta Ufficiale n.35 del 11 febbraio 2019 - S.O. n. 35.
  20. Ministero dell’Interno (1984). Classificazione di reazione al fuoco ed omologazione dei materiali ai fini della prevenzione incendi. D. M. 26 giugno 1984. Gazzetta.Ufficiale 25 agosto 1984 S. O. n. 234.
  21. Ministero dell’Interno (2005). Ministero dell’Interno (1984). Classificazione di reazione al fuoco ed omologazione dei materiali ai fini della prevenzione incendi. D. M. 15 marzo 2005. Gazzetta. Ufficiale 30 marzo 2005.
  22. ResCult, Deliverable D.1.1 (2017). Analysis of data requirements. ResCult project: Increasing Resilience of Cultural heritage: a supporting decision tool for the safeguarding of cultural assets.
  23. Romão X., Paupério E., Pereira N. A framework for the simplified risk analysis of cultural heritage assets Journal of Cultural Heritage, 20 (2016), pp. 696-708., DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.007.
  24. Saaty R.W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process – what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling. Volume 9, Issues 3-5, pages 161-176., DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  25. Santoro L. (2007). Rischio sismico e patrimonio monumentale. Palermo, Flaccovio.
  26. Tozier de la Poterie A., Baudoin M.A. (2015). From Yokohama to Sendai: Approaches to Participation in International Disaster Risk Reduction Framework, Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6 128 – 139.
  27. UNISDR (2005). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters.
  28. UNISR (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 – 2030.
  29. Wright W.C.C., Florian V. (2016). Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage, Ecological Economics 130 277–284.

Federica Appiotti, Vanessa Assumma, Marta Bottero, Pierpaolo Campostrini, Giulia Datola, Enrico Rinaldi, in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 71-72/2018, pp. 121-148, DOI:10.3280/RIV2018-071007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content