Click here to download

The socio-demographic dimensions of the private transportation emissions
Author/s: Giorgio Besagni, Marco Borgarello 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  12 Pg. 13-24 FullText PDF:  221 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2020-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

It is known that the transportation sector accounts for a considerable share of the emissions and the primary energy consumption of the countries as a whole, thus determining an increas-ing attention towards the decarbonisation pathways of the transportation sectors. The energy consumption at the country-scale can be interpreted as the integral of the socio-demographic layer and the behavior spectrum. Thus, ad-hoc policy schemes need to rely on multi-scale ap-proaches, describing the household-scale and, subsequently, scaling-up towards the country-scale. In this long-term aim and perspective, the present communication contributes to the ex-isting discussion regarding relationships between the household/socio-demographic character-istics and the transportation patterns. In particular, focusing on the Italian case study, this communication explores the relationships between the household/socio-demographic variables and the carbon dioxide emissions related to the private transportation sector. To this end, this paper build on micro-data obtained by the Italian Institute of statistics and it applies a four-step statistical method to select suitable variables, explore the significant determinants and perform an household segmentation. It is found that the geographic area (in terms of the macro-scale as well as the micro-scale geographic locations) as well as income-related variables are likely to be factors influencing the carbon dioxide emissions related to the private transportation sector.
Keywords: Carbon dioxide emissions, private transportation sector, residential sector, socio-demographics.
Jel Code: R4, R41

  1. Abenoza R.F., Cats O., Susilo Y.O. (2017). Travel satisfaction with public transport: Determinants, user classes, regional disparities and their evolution. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95: 64-84.
  2. Acheampong R.A., Cugurullo F. (2019). Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62: 349-375.
  3. Arbués P., Baños J.F., Mayor M., Suárez P. (2016). Determinants of ground transport modal choice in long-distance trips in Spain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 84: 131-143.
  4. Baiocchi G., Minx J., Hubacek K. (2010). The Impact of Social Factors and Consumer Behavior on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(1): 50-72.
  5. Bardazzi R., Pazienza M.G. (2018). Ageing and private transport fuel expenditure: Do generations matter? Energy Policy, 117: 396-405.
  6. Basarić V., Vujičić A., Simić J.M., Bogdanović V., Saulić N. (2016). Gender and Age Differences in the Travel Behavior – A Novi Sad Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, 14: 4324-4333.
  7. Besagni G., Borgarello M. (2018). The determinants of residential energy expenditure in Italy. Energy, 165: 369-386.
  8. Besagni G., Borgarello M. (2020). A bottom-up study on the relationships between transportation expenditures and socio-demographic variables: Evidences from the Italian case study. Travel Behaviour and Society, 19: 151-161.
  9. Brand C., Goodman A., Rutter H., Song Y., Ogilvie D. (2013). Associations of individual, household and environmental characteristics with carbon dioxide emissions from motorised passenger travel. Applied Energy, 104: 158-169.
  10. Büchs M., Schnepf S.V. (2013). Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households’ home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions. Ecological Economics, 90: 114-123.
  11. Capros P., Paroussos L., Fragkos P., Tsani S., Boitier B., Wagner F., … Bollen J. (2014). European decarbonisation pathways under alternative technological and policy choices: A multi-model analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2(3): 231-245.
  12. Clayton W., Ben-Elia E., Parkhurst G., Ricci M. (2014). Where to park? A behavioural comparison of bus Park and Ride and city centre car park usage in Bath, UK. Journal of Transport Geography, 36: 124-133.
  13. Development, Ministry of Economic (2020). Monthly fuel prices. --
  14. Dias L.P., Simões S., Gouveia J.P., Seixas J. (2019). City energy modelling - Optimising local low carbon transitions with household budget constraints. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100387.
  15. Edwards S.J., Emmerson C., Namdeo A., Blythe P.T., Guo W. (2016). Optimising landmark-based route guidance for older drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43: 225-237.
  16. Etminani-Ghasrodashti R., Paydar M., Hamidi S. (2018). University-related travel behavior: Young adults’ decision-making in Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43: 495-508.
  17. Fan F., Lei Y. (2016). Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from the transportation sector in Beijing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 42: 135-145.
  18. Fatma D. (2002). Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts, and Adaptation: Why Does Gender Matter? Gender and Development, 10(2): 10-20.
  19. Herold D.M., Lee Ki-Hoon (2017). Carbon management in the logistics and transportation sector: an overview and new research directions. Carbon Management, 8(1): 79-97., DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2017.1283923
  20. ISTAT (2017). Household Budget Survey: microdata for research purposes, reference year: 2015. --
  21. Kawgan-Kagan I. (2015). Early adopters of carsharing with and without BEVs with respect to gender preferences. European Transport Research Review, 7(4): 33.
  22. Ke Y., McMullen B.S. (2017). Regional differences in the determinants of Oregon VMT. Research in Transportation Economics, 62: 2-10.
  23. King M.J., Scott-Parker B.J. (2016). Older male and female drivers in car-dependent settings: how much do they use other modes, and do they compensate for reduced driving to maintain mobility? Ageing and Society, 37(6): 1249-1267.
  24. Liddle B. (2014). Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses. Population and Environment, 35(3): 286-304.
  25. Longhi S. (2015). Residential energy expenditures and the relevance of changes in household circumstances. Energy Economics, 49: 440-450.
  26. Mahadevia D., Advani D. (2016). Gender differentials in travel pattern – The case of a mid-sized city, Rajkot, India. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44: 292-302.
  27. O’Connor R.E., Bard R.J., Fisher A. (1999). Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change. Risk Analysis, 19(3): 461-471.
  28. O’Neill B.C., Liddle B., Jiang L., Smith K.R., Pachauri S., Dalton M., Fuchs R. (2012). Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions. The Lancet, 380(9837): 157-164., DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60958-1
  29. Quattroruote (2017). Consumi ed emissioni: i dati aggiornati e tutto ciò che c’è da sapere.
  30. Torgler B., Garcia-Valiñas M.A., Macintyre A. (2008). Differences in preferences towards the environment: The impact of a gender, age and parental effect. FEEM Working Paper No. 18.
  31. Ventura J.A., Kweon S.J., Hwang S.W., Tormay M., Li C. (2017). Energy policy considerations in the design of an alternative-fuel refueling infrastructure to reduce GHG emissions on a transportation network. Energy Policy, 111: 427-439.
  32. Wang B., Sun Y., Chen Q., Wang Z. (2018). Determinants analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in passenger and freight transportation sectors in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47: 127-132.
  33. Xu B., Lin B. (2015). Factors affecting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China’s transport sector: a dynamic nonparametric additive regression model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101: 311-322.
  34. Zawieska J., Pieriegud J. (2018). Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation. Transport Policy, 63: 39-50.
  35. Zheng Z., Washington S., Hyland P., Sloan K., Liu Y. (2016). Preference heterogeneity in mode choice based on a nationwide survey with a focus on urban rail. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 91: 178-194.

Giorgio Besagni, Marco Borgarello, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2020, pp. 13-24, DOI:10.3280/EFE2020-001002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content