Click here to download

Verso un nuovo professionalismo medico
Journal Title: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Author/s: Elena Spina, Giovanna Vicarelli 
Year:  2021 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  17 Pg. 55-71 FullText PDF:  275 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2021-001005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 



Keywords: Managerialization; health policy; professionalism; hybridization; managerial train-ing; empirical research.

  1. ABIM (1995). Project Professionalism. Philadelphia: ABIM.
  2. ABIM, ACP-ASIM Foundation, EFIM (2002). Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(3): 243-246., DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-0001
  3. Adler P., Kwon S., Hecksher C. (2008). Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community. Organization Science, 19(2): 359-376.
  4. ANAAO, a cura di (2009). I 50 anni dell’Anaao Assomed. Da sempre con i medici per una sanità migliore. Roma: Health Communication.
  5. Capano G., Gualmini E., a cura di (2011). Le pubbliche amministrazioni in Italia, Seconda edizione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  6. Dammacco F., Danieli G. (2010). La formazione del medico dalla tabella XVIII ai nostri giorni. In: FNOMCeO, a cura di, Cento anni di professione al servizio del paese. Roma: FNOMCeO.
  7. Dent M., Kirkpatrick I., Neogy I. (2012). Medical leadership and management reforms in hospitals: a comparative study. In: Teelken C., Ferlie E., Dent M., a cura di, Leadership in the Public Sector. Routledge: London.
  8. Dixon J., Alakeson V. (2010). Reforming Health Care: Why We Need to Learn from International Experience. London: Nuffield Trust.
  9. Elias N. (2010). Marinaio e gentiluomo. La genesi della professionale navale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  10. Evetts J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18(2): 395-415., DOI: 10.1177/026858090301800200
  11. Evetts J. (2011). A New Professionalism? Challenges and Opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4): 406-422., DOI: 10.1177/001139211140258
  12. Freidson E. (2001). Professionalism, the Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Giarelli G., Giovannetti V., a cura di (2019). Il Servizio Sanitario Nazionale italiano in prospettiva europea. Un’analisi comparata. Milano: Angeli.
  14. Kuhlmann E., Blank R., Bourgeault I., Wendt C., a cura di (2015). The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Martin G., Bushfield S., Siebert S., Howieson B. (2020). Changing logics in healthcare and their effects on the identity motives and identity work of doctors. Organization Studies., DOI: 10.1177/017084061989587
  16. Muzio D., Kirkpatrick I. (2011). Introduction: Professions and organizations - a conceptual framework. Current Sociology, 59(4): 389-405., DOI: 10.1177/001139211140258
  17. Neri S., Mori A. (2017). Crisi economica, politiche di austerità e relazioni intergovernative nel Ssn. Dalla regionalizzazione al federalismo differenziato? Autonomie Locali e Servizi Sociali, 40(2): 201-220., DOI: 10.1447/8832
  18. Neri S., Spina E., Vicarelli G. (2020). Le configurazioni mutevoli delle professioni sanitarie. In: Cardano M., Giarelli G., Vicarelli G., a cura di, Sociologia della salute e della medicina. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  19. Noordegraaf M. (2007). From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism: Present-day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domain. Administration and Society, 39(6): 761-785., DOI: 10.1177/00953997073044
  20. Noordegraaf M. (2011). Remaking Professionals? How Associations and Professional Education Connect Professionalism and Organizations. Current Sociology, 59(4): 465-488., DOI: 10.1177/001139211140271
  21. Noordegraaf M. (2015). Hybrid professionalism and beyond. (New) forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2(2): 187-206.
  22. Numerato D., Salvatore D., Fattore G. (2012). The Impact of Management on Medical Professionalism: A Review. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(4): 626-644.
  23. RCP (2005). Doctors in Society: Medical Professionalism in a Changing World. Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians of London. London: Royal College of Physicians.
  24. Sartirana M. (2019). Beyond hybrid professionals: evidence from the hospital sector. BMC Health Serv Res, 19: 634.
  25. Sartirana M., Currie G., Noordegraaf M. (2019). Interactive identity work of professionals in management: A hospital case study. Public Management Review, 21(8): 1191-1212., DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.154926
  26. Vicarelli G. (1997). Alle radici della politica sanitaria in Italia. Società e salute da Crispi al fascismo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  27. Vicarelli G. (2004). Aziendalizzazione e management nell’evoluzione del sistema sanitario italiano/Aziendalizzazione and management in the evolution of the Italian healthcare system. In: Società italiana di Sociologia della Salute, a cura di, La sociologia della salute in Italia: temi, approcci, spendibilità. Milano: Angeli.
  28. Vicarelli G. (2014). Les tâtonnements de la mise en place de la formation managériale des médecins en Italie. Revue Sociologie Santé, 37: 123-136.
  29. Vicarelli G. (2015). Healthcare: Difficult Paths of Reform. In: Ascoli U., Pavolini E., a cura di, The Italian Welfare State in a European Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
  30. Vicarelli G., Pavolini E. (2013). Una “danza generativa” lo studio della sanità in Italia tra management, professioni e politiche. RPS. La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 10(4s): 187-209.
  31. Vicarelli G., Pavolini E. (2017). Dynamics between doctors and managers in the Italian National Health Care System. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(8): 1381-1397., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.1259

Elena Spina, Giovanna Vicarelli, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2021, pp. 55-71, DOI:10.3280/SES2021-001005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content