Click here to download

Which Theoretical-Methodological Future for Violent Radicalisation and Terrorism Studies?
Author/s: Francesco Antonelli 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  15 Pg. 21-35 FullText PDF:  200 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SISS2020-003004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The purpose of the paper is to identify the theoretical-methodological changes in the field of violent radicalisation and terrorism studies. In the first and the sec-ond part, the findings of a systematic review on international scientific literature and a survey on experts, will be showed. In the third part such results will be dis-cussed and the main conclusion of our study will be argued: the research on vio-lent radicalisation and terrorism needs more grounded assumptions and it is getting to move toward the re-inclusion, within the complexity background, of macro-social and macro-politics dimensions within its own analyses.
Keywords: Social Theory, Mixed-Method, Radicalisation, Terrorism, Macro-Social.

  1. Antonelli F. (2020a). Il posto dell’attore sociale nei radicalization and terrorism studies. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 1. -- Disponibile a:
  2. Antonelli F. (2020b). Come la scienza contribuisce alla costruzione del nemico: radicalizzazione violenta e fattori sociali. In Anselmi M., Guercio L., a cura di, Il nemico. Milano: Mondadori.
  3. Antonelli F. (ed.) (2019). Working papers in terrorism studies. Roma: RomaTre Press.
  4. Ardigò A. (1988). Per una sociologia oltre il post-moderno. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  5. Coolsaet R. (2020). “When do individuals radicalise?”. In Muro D., Wilson T. (eds.), Contemporary Terrorism Studies Handbook, in corso di stampa presso Oxford University Press.
  6. Coolsaet R. (2018). “Radicalisation – The origins and limits of a contested concept”. In Fadil N., Ragazzi F. (eds.). Radicalisation in Belgium and the Netherlands: Narratives of Violence and Security. London: I.B.Tauris.
  7. Della Porta D. (2013). Clandestine Political Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Della Porta D., Diani M. (1997). I movimenti sociali. Roma: Carocci.
  9. Eisinger P.K. (1973). “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities”. In The American Political Science Review, 67, 1: 11-28.
  10. Ferrara A. (2016), “La fine del postmoderno nell’orizzonte del postmoderno”. In Quaderni di Teoria Sociale, 2: 65-96.
  11. Githens-Maze J. (2010), “Rethinking the Causal Concept of Islamic Radicalisation. Committee on Concepts and Methods”, -- Disponibile a:
  12. Horgan J. (2005). The Psychology of Terrorism. London: Routledge.
  13. Kepel G. (2019). Uscire dal caos. Le crisi nel Mediterraneo e nel Medio Oriente. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore [ed. orig. 2018].
  14. Khosrokhavar F. (2017). Radicalisation. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
  15. McCauley C., Moskalenko S. (2011), Friction. How radicalization happens to them and us, New York: Oxford University.
  16. McDonald K. (2018). Radicalization. Oxford: Polity Press.
  17. Moghaddam F.M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2): 161-169.
  18. Sassen S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  19. Schmid A.P. (2013). Radicalisation, De-Radicalisation, Counter-Radicalisation: A Conceptual Discussion and Literature Review. In The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague, 4, 2. -- Disponibile a:
  20. Silber M., Bhatt A. (2007). Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat. New York: New York City Police Department.

Francesco Antonelli, Which Theoretical-Methodological Future for Violent Radicalisation and Terrorism Studies? in "SICUREZZA E SCIENZE SOCIALI" 3/2020, pp. 21-35, DOI:10.3280/SISS2020-003004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content