Clicca qui per scaricare

Il futuro della rendita (ripetere Sullo)
Titolo Rivista: ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI 
Autori/Curatori:  Ivan Blecic, Valeria Saiu 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: suppl. 129  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  14 P. 5-18 Dimensione file:  133 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2020-129-S1001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 





  1. Acemoglu D. and Restrepo P. (2018). The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment. American Economic Review, 108(6): 1488-1542.
  2. Alfasi N. (2018). The Coding Turn in Urban Planning: Could It Remedy the Essential Drawbacks of Planning? Planning Theory, 17(3): 375-395., DOI: 10.1177/147309521771620
  3. Autor D.D., Dorn D., Katz L.F., Patterson C. and van Reenen J. (2020). The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2): 645-709.
  4. Blečić I. (2017a). “Il valore di Sullo”. In: Blečić I., a cura di, Lo scandalo urbanistico 50 anni dopo: sguardi e orizzonti sulla proposta di riforma di Fiorentino Sullo. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 7-24.
  5. Blečić I. (2017b). Lo scandalo urbanistico 50 anni dopo: Sguardi e orizzonti sulla proposta di riforma di Fiorentino Sullo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  6. Blečić I. (2020). Antifragile Planning. Planning Theory, 19(2): 172-92., DOI: 10.1177/147309521987336
  7. Blečić I. e Cecchini A. (2016). Verso una pianificazione antifragile. Come pensare al futuro senza prevederlo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Chiodelli F. and Moroni S. (2015). Corruption in Land-Use Issues: A Crucial Challenge for Planning Theory and Practice. Town Planning Review, 86(4): 437-55.
  9. Elsby M.W.L., Hobijn B. and Şahin A. (2013). The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013(2): 1-63.
  10. Falco E. (2016). History of Land Value Recapture in Italy: A Review of Planning and Fiscal Measures Since 1865. Journal of Planning History, 15(3): 230-245., DOI: 10.1177/153851321561528
  11. Girard R. (1980). La violenza e il sacro. Milano: Adelphi.
  12. Girard R. (1996). Delle cose nascoste sin dalla fondazione del mondo. Milano: Adelphi.
  13. Gutiérrez G. and Philippon T. (2018). How European Markets Became Free: A Study of Institutional Drift. w24700. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. Gutiérrez G. and Piton S. (2020). Revisiting the Global Decline of the (Non-Housing) Labor Share. American Economic Review: Insights, 2(3): 321-338.
  15. Homburg S. (2015). Critical remarks on Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Applied Economics, 47(14): 1401-1406., DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2014.99792
  16. Karabarbounis L. and Neiman B. (2014). The Global Decline of the Labor Share. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1): 61-103.
  17. Martinez J. (2018). Automation, Growth and Factor Shares. 736. 2018 Meeting Papers. 2018 Meeting Papers. Society for Economic Dynamics. (Testo disponible al sito: https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed018/736.html).
  18. Milanovic B. (2014). The Return of “Patrimonial Capitalism”: A Review of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2): 519-534.
  19. Moroni S. (2015a). Libertà e innovazione nella città sostenibile: ridurre lo spreco di energie umane. Roma: Carocci.
  20. Moroni S. (2015b). Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities. Planning Theory, 14(3): 248-267., DOI: 10.1177/147309521452110
  21. Piketty T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  22. Pionnier P.-A. and Guidetti E. (2015). Comparing Profit Shares in Value-Added in Four OECD Countries: Towards More Harmonised National Accounts, mag. Paris: OECD.
  23. Rognlie M. (2015). Deciphering the Fall and Rise in the Net Capital Share: Accumulation or Scarcity? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1-54.
  24. Saiu V. (2020). Evaluating Outwards Regeneration Effects (OREs) in Neighborhood-Based Projects: A Reversal of Perspective and the Proposal for a New Tool. Sustainability, 12(24): 10559.
  25. Stiglitz J.E. (2015). New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth among Individuals: Part IV: Land and Credit. w21192. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  26. Stiglitz J.E. (2016). New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth Among Individuals. In: Basu K. and Stiglitz J.E., eds., Inequality and Growth: Patterns and Policy: Volume I: Concepts and Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-71., DOI: 10.1057/9781137554543_
  27. Vettoretto L. (2017). Rendita, rendite e limiti dell’urbanistica del riformismo: l’ordinaria vicenda Sullo. In: Blečić I., a cura di, Lo scandalo urbanistico 50 anni dopo: sguardi e orizzonti sulla proposta di riforma di Fiorentino Sullo. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 183-203.

Ivan Blecic, Valeria Saiu, in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" suppl. 129/2020, pp. 5-18, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2020-129-S1001

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche