Clicca qui per scaricare

Alfred Schutz’s conception of relevance and its significances for the social sciences
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE  
Autori/Curatori: Hisashi Nasu 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 124  Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  20 P. 17-36 Dimensione file:  204 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SR2021-124002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The conception of relevance has come to be increasingly under discussion in various scientific fields under the recent social-cultural-historical conditions of the globalization, digitalization, and liquidation of society. In my opinion, many of these various discussions are, explicitly or implicitly, founded on Alfred Schutz’s ideas about relevance. This essay aims to clarify his sociological conception of relevance founded on phenomenological investigations by inquiries into what he said about the concept and problem of relevance through a comparison between Schutz’s ideas on how to deal with the «incomprehensiveness» of the «totality» of the world with M. Weber’s and F. von Hayek’s with reference to Schutz’s ideas as to how human experience proceeds


  1. Z. Baumann (2011), Culture in a Liquid Modern World, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  2. H. Garfinkel (1953), A Comparison of Decisions Made on Four «Pre-Theoretical» Problems by Talcott Parson and Alfred Schutz, unpublished.
  3. F. von Hayek (1937), «Economics and Knowledge», Economica, 4, pp. 33-54.
  4. F. von Hayek (1945), «The Use of Knowledge in Society», American Economic Review, 35, 4, pp. 519-30 (citation from Individualism and Economic Order, London and Henley, Routledge & Kegan Paul).
  5. E. Husserl (1976), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, erstes Buch, ed. by K. Schuhmann, Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff.
  6. H. Nasu (2013), Alfred Schutz and a Hermeneutical Sociology of Knowledge, in M. Staudigl,
  7. G. Berguno (ed.), Schutzian Phenomenology and Hermeneutic Traditions, Dordrecht, Springer.
  8. M. Natanson (1973), Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks, Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
  9. M. Scheler (1926), Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft, Leipzig, Neue Geist Verlag.
  10. A. Schutz (1925), Erleben, Sprache, Begriff (Spracharbeit), in Theorie der Lebensformen, ed by I. Srubar, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1981.
  11. A. Schutz (1925-27), Lebensformen und Sinnstruktur, in Theorie der Lebensformen, ed. by I. Srubar, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1981.
  12. A. Schutz (1927-28/29), Outline of a Theory of Relevance, in Collected Papers Ⅳ, ed. by H. Wagner, G. Psathas, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  13. A. Schutz (1928), Toward a Viable Sociology, in Collected Papers Ⅳ, ed. by H. Wagner, G. Psathas, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. A. Schutz (1929), Outlines on «Relevance and Action», in Collected Papers Ⅴ, ed. by L. Embree, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, Springer, 2011.
  14. A. Schutz (1932), Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt, Wien, Julius Springer Verlag (citation from Alfred Schutz Werkausgabe Ⅱ, ed. by M. Endreß, J. Renn, Konstanz, Uvk).
  15. A. Schutz (1943), «The Problem of Rationality in the Social World», Economica, 10, pp. 130-49 (citation from Collected Papers II, ed. by A. Brodersen, Dan Haag, Martinus Nijoff, 1964).
  16. A. Schutz (1944), Fragments on the Phenomenology of Music, ed. by F. Kersten, Music and Man, 2, 1976, pp. 5-71 (citation from Collected Papers Ⅳ, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996).
  17. A. Schutz (1945), «On Multiple Realities», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, pp. 533-576 (citation from Collected Papers I, ed. by M. Natanson, Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).
  18. A. Schutz (1946), «The Well-Informed Citizen: An Essay on the Social Distribution of Knowledge », Social Research, 13, pp. 463-78 (Collected Papers II, ed. by A. Brodersen, Dan Haag, Martinus Nijoff, 1964).
  19. A. Schutz (1950), «Language, Language Disturbances, and the Texture of Consciousness», Social Research, 17, pp. 365-94 (citation from Collected Papers I, ed. by M. Natanson, Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).
  20. A. Schutz (1951), «Choosing among Projects of Action», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12, pp. 161-84 (citation from Collected Papers II, ed. by A. Brodersen, Dan Haag, Martinus Nijoff, 1964).
  21. A. Schutz (1952), Gnosticism and Orthodoxy: Constants in Fundamental Metaphysical and Theological Positions, in Collected Papers Ⅳ, ed. by H. Wagner, G. Psathas, Dordrecht/
  22. Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  23. A. Schutz (1953a), «Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14, pp. 1-37 (citation from Collected Papers I, ed. By M. Natanson, Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).
  24. A. Schutz (1953b), «Positivistic Philosophy and the Actual Approach of Interpretative Social Science: An Ineditum of Alfred Schutz from Spring 1953», ed. by L. Embree, Husserl Studies, 14, 2, 1997, pp. 123-49.
  25. A. Schutz (1955), Symbol, Reality and Society, in L. Bryson et al., Symbols and Society, Conference on Science, Philosophy and Religion, New York, Harper (citation from Collected Papers I, ed. by M. Natanson, Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).
  26. A. Schutz (1958), On the Concept of Horizon, in Collected Papers Ⅳ, ed. by H. Wagner, G. Psathas Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  27. A. Schutz (1970), Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, ed. by R. Zaner, New Haven & London, Yale University Press.
  28. A. Schutz (1977), «Husserl and His Influence on Me», ed. by L. Embree, The Annals of Phenomenological Sociology, 2, pp. 41-4.
  29. A. Schutz (1981), Theorie der Lebensformen, ed. I. Srubar, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
  30. A. Schutz, A. Gurwitsch (1989), Philosophy in Exile: The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Aron Gurwitsch, 1939-1959, ed. R. Grathoff, trans. C. Evsans, Blooming and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
  31. A. Schutz, T. Luckmann (2003), Strukturen der Lebenswelt, Konstanz, Uvk.
  32. A. Schutz, E. Voegelin (2004), Eine Freundschaft, die ein Leben ausgehalten hat: Briefwechesel 1938-1959, ed. by G. Wagner, G. Weiss, Konstanz, Uvk.
  33. Srubar I. (1994), Wertbeziehung und Relevanz: Zu Alfred Schutz’ Weber-Rezeption, in G. Wagner, H. Zipprian (eds.), Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp. 36
  34. Strassheim J. (2018), Relevance and Irrelevance, in J. Strassheim, H. Nasu (eds.), Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges, Berlin/Boston, Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
  35. Wagner H.R. (1985), Type Manuscript for a Revised and Enlarged Edition of Alfred Schutz: An Intellectual Biography, unpublished.
  36. Weber M. (1904), «Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis », Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19, pp. 22-87 (citation from Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, fourth edition, ed. J. Winckelmann, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1973).

Hisashi Nasu, Il principio di rilevanza di Alfred Schutz e il suo significato per le scienze sociali in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 124/2021, pp. 17-36, DOI:10.3280/SR2021-124002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche