Clicca qui per scaricare

Cost-benefit analysis of adopting the solar photovoltaic water pumping system: A case of Rajasthan
Titolo Rivista: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Autori/Curatori: Krishna Muniyoor 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: 2  Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 35-49 Dimensione file:  194 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2020-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Rajasthan, the largest state in India, occupies 10.5 per cent of the total geographical area of the country, although about two-thirds of its area is arid. The state has a predominantly agrarian economy, and agriculture is the mainstay of about two-thirds of the workforce. Interestingly, only 28 per cent of the net cultivable area in the state is irrigated, compared to the national average of 49.8 per cent. With the aim to improve irrigation facilities and increase agricultural productivity, the state government implemented the solar photovoltaic water pumping system (SPVWPS) in 2008-09 as an appropriate alternative to grid-connected water pumping. The aim of this paper is to assess the costs and benefits of adopting the SPVWPS using data from a field survey of 126 households. The findings show that use of the SPVWPS offers substantial benefits to adopters in the long run. In addition, government subsidy plays a major role in determining the payback period of adopters’ investment in the scheme. The paper suggests that, alongside timely implementation of the scheme, the government should facilitate domestic manufacturing of solar cells and panels to fully harness social benefits of the SPVWPS.


Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis, solar photovoltaic, agriculture, net present value, payback period.
Jel Code: E22, D61, Q15

  1. Adler M.D., Posner E.A. (1999). Rethinking cost-benefit analysis. The Yale Law Journal, 109: 165-247., DOI: 10.2307/797489
  2. Agricultural Statistics (2017-18). Rajasthan Agricultural Statistics at a glance 2017-18. Department of Agriculture, Government of Rajasthan.
  3. Beriya A. (2020). Comparative insights into smallholder agriculture in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan: A Field Study. ICT India Working Papers#23. Centre for Sustainable Development, Columbia University.
  4. Bossavy A., Girard R., Kariniotakis G. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in the technical potential assessment of onshore wind and ground solar photovoltaic power resources at regional scale. Applied Energy, 182: 145-53.
  5. Burney J., Woltering L., Burke M., Naylor R., Pasternak D. (2010). Solar-powered drip irrigation enhances food security in the Sudano-Sahel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107: 1848-1853.
  6. Campana P.E., Olsson A., Li H., Yan J. (2016). An economic analysis of photovoltaic water pumping irrigation systems. International Journal of Green Energy, 13: 831-839., DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2016.1161631
  7. Central Electricity Authority (2018). CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector, CO2 Baseline Database, Version 13.0, June. Ministry of Power, Government of India, New Delhi.
  8. Chandel S.S., Naik M.N., Chandel R. (2015). Review of solar photovoltaic water pumping system technology for irrigation and community drinking water supplies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49: 1084-1099.
  9. Chaurey A., Sadaphal P.M., Tyaqi D. (1993). Experiences with SPV water pumping systems for rural applications in India. Renewable Energy, 3: 961-4.
  10. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2018). Economic Review 2017-18. Department of Planning, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur; 2017-18.
  11. Fishman R., Devineni N., Raman S. (2015). Can improved agricultural water use efficiency save India’s groundwater? Environmental Research Letters, 10, 084022.
  12. Garrett H. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162: 1243-1248.
  13. Goyal D.K. (2013). Rajasthan Solar Water Pump Programme – Creating a Better Future for Farmers. International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (IPCBEE), 57: 25-30.
  14. Gupta A. (2020). Globalising Agrarian Markets and Changing Production Relations: Village-Level Evidence from India. In: Mishra D., Nayak P. (eds.). Land and Livelihoods in Neoliberal India. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
  15. Gupta E. (2017). Extending solar water pump subsidies: Impact on water use, energy use and cropping patterns in Rajasthan: Difference in differences analysis. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics Working Paper, September -- https://www.isid.ac.in/~epu/acegd2017/papers/EshitaGupta.pdf.
  16. Hossain M.A., Hassan M.S., Mottalib M.A., Hossain M. (2015). Feasibility of solar pump for sustainable irrigation in Bangladesh. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 6: 147-155.
  17. Jamil M., Anees A.S., Rizwan M. (2012). SPV based water pumping system for an academic institution. American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 1: 1-7.
  18. Khanna R.K., Rathore R.S., Sharma C. (2008). Solar still an appropriate technology for potable water need of remote villages of desert state of India, Rajasthan. Desalination, 220: 645-653.
  19. Kishore A., Shah T., Tewari N.P. (2014). Solar irrigation pumps. Economic and Political Weekly, 49: 55-62.
  20. Krishna M. (2020). Is there a tradeoff between energy consumption and employment: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255 (120262).
  21. Kumar A., Kandpal T.C. (2007). Potential and cost of CO2 emissions mitigation by using solar photovoltaic pumps in India. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 26: 159-166., DOI: 10.1080/14786450701679332
  22. Kumar A., Mishra A.K., Saroj S., Joshi P.K. (2017). Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: Evidence on impact from a national farmers’ survey. Economic Systems, 41: 420-432.
  23. Li G., Jin Y., Akram M.W., Chen X. (2017). Research and current status of the solar photovoltaic water pumping system – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79: 440-58.
  24. Mahmoud E., Nather H. (2003). Renewable energy and sustainable developments in Egypt: photovoltaic water pumping in remote areas. Applied Energy, 74: 141-7.
  25. Meah K., Fletcher S., Ula S. (2008). Solar photovoltaic water pumping for remote locations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12: 472-87.
  26. Ministry of Finance (2019). Climate summit for enhanced action: A financial perspective from India. Discussion paper, Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.
  27. Mora J.C., Barón J.M.C., Santos J.M.R., Payán M.B. (2007). An evolutive algorithm for wind farm optimal design. Neurocomputing, 70: 2651-2658.
  28. Narvarte L., Lorenzo E., Aandam M. (2005). Lessons from a PV pumping programme in south Morocco. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 13: 261-70.
  29. Nemet G.F., O’Shaughnessy E., Wiser R., Darghouth N., Barbose G., Gillingham K., Rai V. (2017). Characteristics of low-priced solar PV systems in the US. Applied Energy, 187: 501-13.
  30. NITI Aayog (2015). Report on the Expert Group on 175 GW RE by 2022, National Institution for Transforming India, New Delhi.
  31. Parajuli R., Pokharel G.R., Østergaard P.A. (2013). A comparison of diesel, biodiesel and solar PV-based water pumping systems in the context of rural Nepal. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 33: 536-53., DOI: 10.1080/14786451.2012.761221
  32. Purohit P. (2007). Financial evaluation of renewable energy technologies for irrigation water pumping in India. Energy Policy, 35: 3134-44.
  33. Purohit P., Kandpal T.C. (2011). Solar photovoltaic water pumping in India: a financial evaluation. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 26: 135-146.
  34. Ramadhan M., Naseeb A. (2011). The cost benefit analysis of implementing photovoltaic solar system in the state of Kuwait. Renewable Energy, 36: 1272-1276.
  35. Ramos J.S., Ramos H.M. (2009). Solar powered pumps to supply water for rural or isolated zones: a case study. Energy for Sustainable Development, 13: 151-158.
  36. Registrar General of India. Census of India 2011: Provisional population totals-India datasheet. Office of the Registrar General Census Commissioner India; 2011.
  37. Reinoso C.S., De Paula M., Buitrago R.H. (2014). Cost-benefit analysis of a photovoltaic power plant. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39: 8708-8711.
  38. Ricke K., Drouet L., Caldeira K., Tavoni M. (2018). Country-level social cost of carbon. Nature Climate Change, 8: 895-900.
  39. Shah T., Rajan A., Rai G.P., Verma S., Durga N. (2018). Solar pumps and South Asia’s energy-groundwater nexus: exploring implications and reimagining its future. Environmental Research Letters, 13, 115003.
  40. Sontake V.C., Kalamkar V.R. (2016). Solar photovoltaic water pumping system- A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59: 1038-1067.
  41. Zhang X., Shen J., Xu P., Zhao X., Xu Y. (2014). Socio-economic performance of a novel solar photovoltaic/loop-heat-pipe heat pump water heating system in three different climatic regions. Applied Energy, 135: 20-34.
  42. Zhou D., Abdullah. (2017). The acceptance of solar water pump technology among rural farmers of northern Pakistan: A structural equation model. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 3: 1280882., DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2017.1280882

Krishna Muniyoor, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2020, pp. 35-49, DOI:10.3280/EFE2020-002002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche