Click here to download

Italian communication professionals: a comparison among public and private sector ones in search of sediments of innovation
Author/s: Francesco Marrazzo 
Year:  2021 Issue: 61 Language: English 
Pages:  10 Pg. 149-158 FullText PDF:  278 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SC2021-061010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The Covid-19 emergency has made evident the need for a new approach to public communication and, consequently, the update of the public sector commu-nicators skills. Starting from the analysis of the differences between professional condition, education, digital competence level and, especially, working activities carried out by public sector and private sector communicators who have partici-pated in an Italian media regulatory authority (AGCOM) survey, the goal of these contribution is to identify those elements of innovation in private sector communi-cators job that could be useful in shaping a new professional figure suitable for the evolution of the public communication role in a increasingly disintermediated in-formation environment.
Keywords: public communication, communication professionals, digital compe-tence, public administration, innovation, disintermediation

  1. Di Franco G., Marradi A. (2013), Factor analysis and principal component analysis, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  2. AGCOM (2017), Osservatorio sul Giornalismo. II edizione, -- available on the website
  3. AGCOM (2020), Osservatorio sul Giornalismo III edizione. La professione giornalistica alla prova dell’emergenza COVID-19, -- available on the website
  4. Di Maggio P., Hargittai E., Celeste C., Shafer S. (2004), From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality, in Neckerman K.M. (ed.) Social Inequality, Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 355-400.
  5. Ducci G. (2017), Relazionalità consapevole. La comunicazione pubblica nella società connessa, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  6. Ducci G., Materassi L., Solito L. (2020), Re-Connecting Scholars’ Voices: An historical Review of Public Communication in Italy and New Challenges in the Open Government Framework, in «Partecipazione e conflitto», 13(2), pp. 1062-1084.
  7. Faccioli F. (2016), Comunicazione pubblica e media digitali: la prospettiva del public engagement, in «Problemi dell’informazione», 1, pp. 13-36, 82960.
  8. George J. J., Leidner D. E. (2019), From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism, in «Information and Organization», 29(3), 100249,
  9. Iturregui-Mardaras L., Gutiérrez-Cuesta J., Cantalapiedra-González M. (2020), Journalists and Public Relations professionals: from influence and dependence to journalistic disintermediation, in «El profesional de la información», 29, 3, --
  10. Livingstone S., Helsper E. (2007), Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide, in «New media & society», 9(4), 671-696, --
  11. Lovari A. (2016), Comunicatori pubblici dietro la timeline. La sfida dei social media tra nuove competenze professionali e vecchie resistenze al cambiamento, in «Problemi dell’informazione», 1, pp. 61-86,, DOI: 10.1445/82962
  12. Lovari A., Parisi L. (2012), Public administrations and citizens 2.0: Exploring digital public communication strategies and civic interaction within Italian municipality pages on Facebook, in Comunello F. (a cura di), Networked sociability and individualism: Technology for personal and professional relationships, IGI Global, Hershey, (PA), pp. 238-263.
  13. Lovari A., Parisi L. (2015), Listening to digital publics. Investigating citizens’ voices and engagement within Italian municipalities’ Facebook Pages, in «Public relations review», 41(2), pp. 205-213,
  14. Lovari A., D’Ambrosi L., Bowen S. A. (2020), Re-Connecting Voices. The (New) Strategic Role of Public Sector Communication After Covid-19 crisis, in «Partecipazione e Conflitto», 13(2), pp. 970-989
  15. Materassi L., Solito L. (2015), Le strade della comunicazione pubblica. Assetti organizzativi nei Comuni toscani, in «Problemi dell’informazione», 40(2), pp. 303-334,, DOI: 10.1445/80999
  16. Mergel I., Bretschneider S.I. (2013), A Three Stage Adoption Process for Social Media Use in Government, in «Public Administration Review», 73(3), pp. 390-400. --
  17. Monitoring Unit to combat the spread of fake news related to Covid-19 on the web and on social networks at the Presidency of the Italian Council of Ministers (2020), Programma operativo di attività, -- available at
  18. Mounk Y. (2018), The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
  19. Nielsen R. K., Fletcher R., Newman N., Brennen S., Howard P.N. (2020), Navigating the ‘infodemic’: how people in six countries access and rate news and information about Coronavirus, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalis, Oxford.
  20. Solito L., Pezzoli S., Materassi L. (2019), Prove di “maturità”. Social media e bisogni informativi della cittadinanza, in «Problemi dell’informazione», 2, pp. 339-364., DOI: 10.1445/94254.
  21. Tronti L. (2016), Potenziare le competenze dei dipendenti pubblici. Quali strategie?, CIRET-SNA.
  22. Van Dijck J., Poell T., De Waal M. (2018), The platform society: Public values in a connective world, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  23. Working Group at the Ministry of the Public Administration (2020), Riforma della comunicazione pubblica proposte operative in 10 punti, -- available at operative-10-punti.
  24. Salaverría R., Buslón N., López-Pan F., León B., López-Goñi I., Erviti M.C. (2020), Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19, in «El profesional de la información», 29, 3, --

Francesco Marrazzo, in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 61/2021, pp. 149-158, DOI:10.3280/SC2021-061010


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content