Clicca qui per scaricare

Natura o tecnica? Sars-Cov-2, nuovi materialismi e critica dell’Antropocene
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Autori/Curatori: Luigi Pellizzoni 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2022 Fascicolo: 127 Concetti chiave e innovazioni teoriche della sociologia dell’ambiente e del territorio del dopo Covid-19 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  13 P. 94-106 Dimensione file:  284 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2022-127008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


La pandemia del Sars-CoV-2 sollecita la sociologia dell’ambiente a interrogarsi sugli approcci adeguati a renderne conto. A lungo la disciplina è stata dominata dal dibattito tra realismo e costruttivismo, de facto privilegiando quest’ultimo. La "svolta ontologica" nelle scienze sociali e umane ha portato alla ribalta materialismi anti-dualisti, idonei sulla carta a confrontarsi con un ibrido socio-materiale quale il Sars-CoV-2. Tuttavia, le implicazioni emancipative tratte dalla critica dei dualismi moderni non hanno riscontro in una situazione in cui l’estrazione di valore coincide sempre più con la negazione della distinzione tra natura e tecnica. Il dibattito sull’Antropocene offre una prospettiva utile a fare chiarezza.


Keywords: Sars-CoV-2, svolta ontologica, materialismo sostenibile, Antropocene, giustizia ambientale, cura

  1. Acosta A. (2013). Extractivism and neoextractivism: two Sides of the same curse. In Lang. M., Mokrani D. (eds.). Beyond Development. Alternative Visions from Latin America. Amsterdam-Quito: Transnational Institute-Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
  2. Aronowski L. (2021). Gas guzzling Gaia, or: a prehistory of climate change denialism. Critical Inquiry, 47(2): 306-327., DOI: 10.1086/712129
  3. Barad K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3): 801-831., DOI: 10.1086/345321
  4. Barad K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  5. Bennett J. (2010). Vibrant Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  6. Bonneuil C.; Fressoz J.B. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
  7. Bosi L., Zamponi L. (2015). Direct social actions and economic crises. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8(2): 367-391.
  8. Breakthrough Institute (2015). An Ecomodernist Manifesto. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto.
  9. Buchanan A. (2011). Beyond Humanity? The Ethics of Biomedical Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Bulle S. (2018). Formes de vie, milieux de vie. La forme-occupation. Multitudes, 71: 168-175.
  11. Chakrabarty D. (2009). The climate of history: four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35 (Winter): 197-222., DOI: 10.1086/596640
  12. Clark N. (2011). Inhuman Nature. London: Sage.
  13. Clark N. (2013). Geoengineering and geologic politics. Environment and Planning A, 45(12): 2825-2832.
  14. Clark N., Yusoff K. (2017). Geosocial formations and the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2-3): 3-23., DOI: 10.1177/0263276416688946
  15. Clough S. (2003). Beyond Epistemology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  16. Coole D., Frost S. (eds.) (2010). New Materialisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  17. Daggett C.N. (2019). The Birth of Energy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  18. Davidson D., Gross M. (eds.) (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Energy and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Demeulenaere E., Piersante Y. (2020). In or out? Organisational dynamics within European ‘peasant seed’ movements facing opening-up institutions and policies. Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4): 767-791., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1753704
  20. Escobar A. (2010). Postconstructivist political ecologies. In Redclift M., Woodgate G. (eds.) The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Second Edition. Cheltenham: Elgar.
  21. Ferdinand M. (2019). Une écologie décoloniale. Paris: Seuil.
  22. Fraser N. (2014). Behind Marx’s hidden abode: for an expanded conception of capitalism. New Left Review, 86 (Mar/Apr): 55-72.
  23. Geels F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31: 1257-1274.
  24. Gentili D. (2018). Crisi come arte di governo. Macerata: Quodlibet.
  25. Goldman M., Schurman R. (2000). Closing the “Great Divide”: new social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 563-584.
  26. Gross M., Mautz R. (2015). Renewable Energies. London: Routledge.
  27. Grosz E. (2011). Becoming Undone. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  28. Gudynas E. (2010). Si eres tan progresista ¿Por qué destruyes la naturaleza? Neoextractivismo, izquierda y alternativas. Ecuador Debate (CAAP-Quito), 79: 61-81.
  29. Hannigan J. (1995). Environmental Sociology. London: Routledge.
  30. Holbraad M., Pedersen M.A. (2017). The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Keck F. (2020). Asian Reservoirs. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  32. Lakoff A. (2017). Unprepared. Global Health in a Time of Emergency. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  33. Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Latour B. (2000). Politiche della natura. Milano: Cortina.
  35. Latour B. (2017). Facing Gaia. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  36. Latour B. (2018). Tracciare la rotta. Come orientarsi in politica. Milano: Cortina.
  37. Lovelock J. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Lynch M. (2017). STS, symmetry and post-truth. Social Studies of Science, 47(4): 593-599., DOI: 10.1177/0306312717720308
  39. Malm A., Hornborg A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1): 62-69., DOI: 10.1177/2053019613516291
  40. Martinez-Alier J. (2009). Ecologia dei poveri. Milano: Jaca Book.
  41. Mbembe A. (2016). Necropolitica. Verona: Ombre Corte.
  42. Meyer J. (2015). Engaging the Everyday. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  43. Mitchell T. (2011). Carbon Democracy. London: Verso.
  44. Mol A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. In Law J., Hassard J. (eds.) Actor-Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
  45. Moore J. (2017). Antropocene o capitalocene? Verona: Ombre Corte.
  46. Mouffe C. (2013). Agonistics. London: Verso.
  47. Norgaard R. (1994). Development Betrayed. London: Routledge.
  48. O’Malley P. (2010). Resilient subjects: uncertainty, warfare and liberalism. Economy and Society, 39(4): 488-509., DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2010.510681
  49. Osti G., Pellizzoni L. (a cura di) (2018). Energia e innovazione tra flussi globali e circuiti locali. Trieste: EUT.
  50. Pellizzoni L. (2016). Ontological Politics in a Disposable World: The New Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
  51. Pellizzoni L. (2021). Prefiguration, subtraction and emancipation. Social Movement Studies, 20(3): 364-379., DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2020.1752169
  52. Poupeau F. (2012). Les Mésaventures de la Critique. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.
  53. Povinelli E. (2016). Geontologies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  54. Puig de la Bellacasa M. (2017). Matters of Care. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  55. Schlosberg D., Coles R. (2016). The new environmentalism of everyday life: sustainability, material flows and movements. Contemporary Political Theory, 15(2): 160-181.
  56. Schlosberg D. (2019). From postmaterialism to sustainable materialism: the environmental politics of practice-based movements. Environmental Politics, special issue: 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1587215
  57. Scotti I. (2020). Vento forte. Eolico e professioni della green economy. Napoli: Orthotes.
  58. Smil V. (2017). Energy and Civilization: A History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  59. Srnicek N., Williams A. (2015). Inventing the Future. London: Verso.
  60. Stengers I. (2017). Autonomy and the intrusion of Gaia. South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(2): 381-400., DOI: 10.1215/00382876-3829467
  61. Svampa M. (2019). Neo-Extractivism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  62. Thacker E. (2007). The Global Genome. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  63. Vanloqueren G., Baret P.V. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38: 971-983.
  64. Wallace R. (2016). Big Farms Make Big Flu. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  65. Yates L. (2015). Rethinking prefiguration: alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 14(1): 1-21., DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2013.870883

Luigi Pellizzoni, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 127/2022, pp. 94-106, DOI:10.3280/SUR2022-127008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche