Cost management tools and performance measurement systems in the new competitive context
Author/s: Lino Cinquini, Rosa Alba Miraglia, Riccardo Giannetti 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  10 Pg. 5-14 FullText PDF:  155 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MACO2016-002001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The topic of cost management tools and performance measurement systems has been addressed in the field of management studies with the aim of identifying the factors that have caused and that determine the success of companies in global competition. It is believed that, today and in the next future, the key dimensions of competitive advantage of companies are the following: sustainability, intellectual capital and intercompany integration. These dimensions, having a common matrix represented by the complexity, must be integrated in the formulation of the business strategies. This requires the development of suitable cost management tools and performance measures to verify the achievement of the strategies. But what are the links that are created between strategy, in its various manifestations, and cost management tools and performance measurement? This special issue of the Journal is intended to analyze such links.
Keywords: Environmental management, sustainability, environmental accounting, cost management, performance measurement.

  1. Agndal H., Nilsson U. (2009), Interorganization cost management in the exchange process, Management Accounting Research, 20, pp. 85-101.
  2. , DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00020-5
  3. Bartolomeo M. (1997), La contabilità ambientale d’impresa, Bologna, il Mulino.
  4. Basu R. (2001), New criteria of performance management: a transition from enterprise to collaborative supply chain, Measuring Business Excellence, 5 (4).
  5. Beamon B.M., Chen V. (2001), Performance analysis of conjoined supply chain, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39, No. 17.
  6. Booker D.M., Drake R.A., Heitger D.L. (2007), New Product Development: How Cost Information Precision Affects Designer Focus and Behavior in a Multiple Objective Setting, Behavioral Research in Accounting 19, 19-41.
  7. , DOI: 10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.19
  8. Chan F., Qi H.J. (2003), Feasibility of performance measurement system for supply chain: a process-based approach and measures, Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol. 14, No 3.
  9. , DOI: 10.1108/09576060310463145
  10. Chiesa V., Frattini F. (2009), Evaluation and performance Measurement of Research and Development. Techniques and Perspectives for Multi-Level Analysis, E. Elgar Publishing.
  11. Cinquini L., Passetti E., Tenucci A. & Frey M. (2012), Analyzing intellectual capital information in sustainability reports: some empirical evidence, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), pp. 531-561.
  12. Coad A.F., Cullen J. (2006), Inter-organisational cost management: Towards an evolutionary perspective, Management Accounting Research, 17, pp. 342-369.
  13. , DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.003
  14. Cooper R., Slagmulder R. (2004), Interorganizational cost management and relational context, Accounting, organizations and Society, 29, pp. 1-26.
  15. , DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00020-5
  16. Davila. T., Wouters M. (2004), Designing Cost-Competitive Technology Products through Cost Management, Accounting Horizons, 18(1), pp. 13-26.
  17. , DOI: 10.2308/acch.2004.18.1.13
  18. Epstein M.J. & Roy M.-J. (2001), Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers, Long Range Planning, 34(5), pp. 585-604.
  19. , DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00084-X
  20. Gond J.-P., Grubnic S., Herzig C. & Moon J. (2012), Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability, Management Accounting Research 23(3), pp. 205-223., DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003
  21. Goyal P., Rahman Z., Kazmi A. (2013), Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: literature review and future research agenda, Management Decision, pp. 51(2), 361-379.
  22. Ittner C.D. (2008), Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence, Accounting & Business Research 38(3), pp. 261-272.
  23. Kloepffer W. (2008), Life cycle sustainability assessment of products, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), pp. 89-95., DOI: 10.1065/lca2008.02.376
  24. Lisi I.E. (2015), Translating environmental motivations into performance: The role of environmental performance measurement systems, Management Accounting Research, 29, pp. 27-44., DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001
  25. Mancini D. (2011), L’azienda-rete e le decisioni di partnership: il ruolo del sistema informativo relazionale, Management Control, 1, pp. 65-97., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-001004
  26. Marchi L. (2011), L’evoluzione del controllo di gestione nella prospettiva informativa e gestionale esterna, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-16., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-003001
  27. Marelli, A. (2015). The evolving role of environmental management accounting in internal decision-making: a research note, International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 11(1), pp. 14-47., DOI: 10.1504/IJAAPE.2015.068081
  28. Miraglia R.A. (2005), Reti di aziende e sistema informativo interorganizzativo, G. Giappichelli.
  29. Miraglia R.A., Leotta A. (2010), The interaction between information and trust in the control of transactional relationship: theoretical perspectives and empirical support. In Epstein M., Manzoni J.F., Davila A., Performance Measurement & Management Control – Innovative Concepts & Practices, vol. 20, Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd, pp. 143-175.
  30. Miraglia R.A. (2012), Nuove tendenze nei sistemi di controllo e di misurazione delle performance, Management Control, 2, pp. 5-14., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2012-002001
  31. Moll J. (2015), Editorial: Special issue on innovation and product development, Management Accounting Research, 28, pp. 2-11., DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.05.003
  32. Pisani M. (2002), L’ambiente naturale nel bilancio di esercizio. Costi e passività ambientali, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  33. Williamson D., Lynch-Wood G., Ramsay J. (2006), Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), pp. 317-330., DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1
  34. Wyatt A. (2008), What financial and non-fínancial information on intangibles is value-relevant? A review of the evidence, Accounting & Business Research 38(3), pp. 217-256.

Lino Cinquini, Rosa Alba Miraglia, Riccardo Giannetti, Cost management tools and performance measurement systems in the new competitive context in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2/2016, pp. 5-14, DOI:10.3280/MACO2016-002001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content