Click here to download

Workplace safety: negotiate to build
Journal Title: STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI  
Author/s: Silvia Doria 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 32-55 FullText PDF:  522 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SO2013-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The paper presents the findings of a shadowing of the actors of workplace safety in the construction site of a new underground line in Rome. The paper aims to analyze the function of mediation conducted by the managers of the worksite (the foreman and his assistant) between two professional groups whit opposing views: on the one hand, there is the management level, which seeks to carry out work on time and within budget, in accordance with the formal safety standards. On the other hand, there are workers who, as a result of these requests, experience a paradoxical condition: working quickly and safely can be translated in practice only going beyond the safety rules and standards. Practices of workers are based not only and not always on a willingness to challenge the rules or on a sort of cockiness, a contempt of danger, but on their practical knowledge learnt in periods in which rules were less "sensitive" to safety. The site foreman and his assistant perform a daily practice of negotiation between these two different, not always reconcilable, positions and professional views. This game of roles and performances, especially among foremen and workers, offers the opportunity to look at the constructed and dynamic nature of safety learning, a social competence that is learnt on the job. .
Keywords: Workplace safety; construction site; practices of mediation and negotiation; managers of the worksite; shadowing

  1. Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., Lofland, L. (eds.) (2001), Handbook of Ethnography, London, Sage Publications Ltd.
  2. Bonazzi, G. (2008), Storia del pensiero organizzativo, Bologna, il Mulino.
  3. Bruni, A. (2010), La sicurezza organizzativa. Un’etnografia in sala operatoria, Roma, Carocci.
  4. Bruni, A. (2003), Lo studio etnografico delle organizzazioni, Roma, Carocci.
  5. Bruni, A., Gherardi S. (2007), Studiare le pratiche lavorative, Bologna, il Mulino.
  6. Callon, M. (1992), “The dynamics of techno-economic networks”, in Combs, R., Saviotti, P., Walsh, V. (eds.), Technological Change and Company Strategies. Economic and Social Perspectives, London, Academic Press.
  7. Callon, M. (1986), “The sociology of an Actor-Network”, in Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A., (eds.), Mapping the Dynamic of Science and Technology, London, McMillan. Catino, M. (2002), Da Chernobyl a Linate: incidenti tecnologici o errori organizzativi?, Roma, Carocci.
  8. Catino, M., Albolino, S. (2008), “Colpa ed errore. Logiche d’analisi in aeronautica e in medicina”, Studi organizzativi, 1: 117-144.
  9. Conein, B., Jacopin, E. (1994), “Action située et cognition: le savoir en place”, Sociologie du travail, XXXVI, 4: 475-500.
  10. Cooper, R., Law, J. (1995), “Organization: Distal and Proximal View” in S. Bacharach, P. Gagliardi, B. Mundell (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Studies of Organizations in the European Tradition, 13, Greenwich, JAI Press, 237-274.
  11. Czarniawska, B. (2007), Shadowing, and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Barbara Czarniawska and Liber AB.
  12. Czarniawska, B., Hernes, T. (eds.) (2005), Actor-Network Theory and Organizing, Sweden, Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
  13. Czarniawska, B., Joerges, B. (1995), “Venti di cambiamento organizzativo: come le idee si traducono in oggetti e azioni”, in Bacharach S.B., Gagliardi P., Mundell B. (a cura di), Il pensiero organizzativo europeo, Milano, Edizione Angelo Guerini e Associati, pp. 213-255.
  14. Doria, S. (2012), “Raccontare la sicurezza sul lavoro …attraverso le storie degli altri!”, in Poggio, B., Valastro, O. M. (a cura di), Raccontare, Ascoltare, Comprendere: Metodologia e Ambiti di Applicazione delle Narrazioni nelle Scienze Sociali, M@gm@, 10/1, http://www.magma.analisiqualitativa.com/1001/articolo_08.htm
  15. Doria, S. (2011a), La sicurezza in costruzione. Etnografia di un cantiere. Pratiche di controllo, mediazione e corpi al lavoro, tesi di dottorato, Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali (DiSS), Sapienza Università di Roma, disponibile su http://hdl.handle.net/10805/1309.
  16. Doria, S. (2011b), “Che genere di etnografia! Il cantiere non è un posto per donne”, in Krippendorff K., La Rocca G. (a cura di), Ricerca qualitativa e giovani studiosi. Atti del Convegno Internazionale “RiQGioS-2011”, Palermo, Social Books, ISBN: 978-88-95279-18-3
  17. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., Shaw, L. L. (2001), “Participant Observation and Fieldnotes”, in Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., Lofland, L. (eds.), Handbook of Ethnography, London, Sage Publications Ltd.
  18. Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  19. Gherardi, S. (2006), Organizational Knowledge: the Texture of Workplace Learning, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  20. Gherardi, S. (2000), “Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations”, Organization 7/2: 211-223.
  21. Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. (2001), “Il pensiero pratico. Un’etnografia dell’apprendimento”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 2: 231-255.
  22. Gherardi S., Nicolini D., Odella F. (1997), “Dal rischio alla sicurezza: il contributo sociologico alla costruzione di organizzazioni affidabili”, Quaderni di sociologia, 13: 79-108.
  23. Goffman, E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York, Garden City (trad. it., La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione, Bologna, il Mulino, 1969). Goodwin, C. (1994), “Professional Vision”, American Anthropologist, 3: 606-633 (trad. it., Visioni professionali, in C. Goodwin Il senso del vedere, Roma, Maltemi editore, (2003).
  24. Gouldner, A.W. (1954), Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. A study of Modern Factory Administration, Glencoe, IL, Free Press (trad. it., Modelli di burocrazia aziendale, Milano, Etas Kompass, 1970).
  25. Health, C., Luff, P. (1992), “Collaboration and Control. Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms”, Computer- Supported Cooperative Work, 1: 69-94.
  26. INAIL, (2012), Rapporto Annuale 2011.
  27. Joseph, I. (1994), “Attention distribuée et attention focalisée. Les protocoles de la coopération au PCC de la ligne A du RER”, Sociologie du travail, XXXVI, 4: 563-585.
  28. Latour, B. (1987), Science in action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press (trad. it., La scienza in azione, Torino, Edizioni di Comunità, 1992).
  29. Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991), Situate Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  30. Law, J. (1994), Organizing Modernity, Oxford, Blackwell.
  31. Linhart, R. (1978), L’établi, Paris, Les Editions de Minuit.
  32. March, J. G., Olsen, J. P. (1989), Rediscovering the Institutions. The Organizational basis of politics, New York, The Free Press (trad. it., Riscoprire le istituzioni, Bologna, il Mulino, 2000).
  33. Marzano, M. (2006), Etnografia e ricerca sociale, Roma, Laterza.
  34. Nicolini, D. (2001), “Il tessuto interorganizzativo della sicurezza: una visione prossimale”, Studi organizzativi, 2-3: 93-117.
  35. Pentimalli, B. (2011), “Annotare sul taccuino insulti e battute delle operatrici call-center: alla scoperta dei rituali di derisione clandestina dell’utente”, in Krippendorff K., La Rocca G. (a cura di), Ricerca qualitativa e giovani studiosi. Atti del Convegno Internazionale “RiQGioS-2011”, Palermo, Social Books.
  36. Pentimalli, B. (2008), “Pratiche di cooperazione in un Call Center: uso congiunto e situato delle tecnologie e messa in scena di ‘performance intellegibili’”, paper presentato al II Convegno nazionale STS Italia: Catturare Proteo. Tecnoscienza e società della conoscenza in Europa, Università di Genova, 19-21 Giugno; disponibile sul sito www.stsitalia.org/papers2008.
  37. Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul (trad. it., La conoscenza personale. Verso una filosofia post-critica, Milano, Rusconi, 1990).
  38. Roy, D. (1952), “Quota Restriction and Goldbricking in a Machine Shop”, American Journal of Sociology, 57: 427-442.
  39. Sachs, P. (1993), “Shadows in the Soup: Conceptions of Work and Nature of Evidence”, The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Human Cognition, 15: 125-32.
  40. Schütz, A. (1979), Saggi sociologici, Torino, Utet.
  41. Sclavi, M. (1989), Ad una spanna da terra, Milano, Feltrinelli.
  42. Silverman, D. (1997), Doing Qualitative Research, London, Sage, (trad. it., Come fare ricerca qualitativa, Roma, Carocci, 2002.
  43. Strati, A. (2000), “Estetica, conoscenza tacita e apprendimento organizzativo” Studi organizzativi, 2: 157-177.
  44. Strauss, A. (1978), Negotiation: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order, San
  45. Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. Suchman, L. (1987), Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-machine Communication, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  46. Turner, B. A., Pidgeon, N. (1997), Man-Made Disasters, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, (2a ed.).
  47. Van Maanen, J. (1988), Tales of the field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  48. Viteritti, A. (2011), “Corpi sapienti in laboratorio. Apprendere la tecnoscienza in pratica tra disciplinamento e formatività”, Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, il Mulino, Bologna, 1: 61-82.
  49. Yakhlef, A. (2010), “The corporeality of practice-based learning”, Organization Studies, 31/4: 409-430.

Silvia Doria, Workplace safety: negotiate to build in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 1/2013, pp. 32-55, DOI:10.3280/SO2013-001002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content