The effect of demographic variables on the assessment of cooperation and objectivity of the teaching process of higher education institutions

Titolo Rivista CADMO
Autori/Curatori Maja S. Vukadinovic, Natasa Papic-Blagojevic, Ana Jovicic Vukovic
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2022/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 13 P. 72-84 Dimensione file 201 KB
DOI 10.3280/CAD2022-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study explores the effect of demographic variables on the students’ assessments of cooperation and objectiveness regarding the teaching pro- cess in higher education institutions. The study included 361 students, aged between 18 and 24, who were mostly women (64.8%). Demographic vari- ables measured were gender, the year of study, the model of financing, place where they live, previous education and higher education institution they currently attend. The effectiveness of the teaching process was measured by the students’ ratings of cooperation (cooperation, collegiality, teamwork and creativity) and objectiveness (objective grading system, availability of professors, quality and knowledge). The students evaluated each of these on a five­point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). The results have shown that the institution which students attend has a strong ef- fect on their ratings of cooperation and objectiveness. Possible directions for improving the teaching process and its outcomes are disscussed.

Keywords:demographic variables, cooperation, objectiveness, students, teaching process, higher education institutions.

  1. Moore, D.S., McCabe, G.P., Alwan, L.C., Craig, B.A., Duckworth, W.M. (2011), The Practice of Statistics for Business and Economics. New York: Palgrave Mac- Millan, 3rd ed.
  2. Newbold, P., Carlson, W.L., Thorne, B. (2003), Statistics for Business and Economics. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 5th ed.
  3. Papić­Blagojević, N., Vukadinović, M., Jovičić Vuković, A. (2022), “Factor struc- ture of the effectiveness of the teaching process in higher education institutions – The perception of students”, Economics Theory and Practice, 15 (3), pp. 1-12.
  4. Pounder, J.S. (1999), “Organisational effectiveness in higher education: Managerial implications of a Hong Kong study”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 27 (4), pp. 389-400, DOI: 10.1177/0263211255X990274006
  5. Rajapriya, M., Kumar, N. (2017), “Effectiveness of mind mapping in higher edu- cation”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8 (4), pp. 975­998, -- http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues. asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8 &IType=4.
  6. Rosa, M.J., Amaral, A. (2007), A self-assessment of HEIs from the perspective of the EFQM excellence model. In D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, M.J. Rosa (Eds), Quality assurance in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer, str. 181-207.
  7. Rózsa, Z. (2010), Adaptation of the SERVQUAL scale in Sempa Bratislava. In Iternational Scientific Conference Management, Krusevac (Serbia), pp. 17-18.
  8. Schinske, J., Tanner, K. (2014), “Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently)”, CBE Life Sciences Education, 13 (2), pp. 159-166,
  9. Sherry, C., Bhat, R., Beaver, B., Ling, A. (2004), Students as customers: The ex- pectations and perceptions of local and international students. In Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom, Proceedings of the 27th HERDSA Annual Conference. Miri, Sarawak: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Aus- tralasia.
  10. Shields, S.A. (2003), Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Sultan, P., Wong, H.Y. (2011), “Service quality in a higher education context: ante- cedents and dimensions”, International Review of Business Research Papers, 7 (2), pp. 11-20.
  12. Stodnick, M., Rogers, P. (2008), “Using SERVQUAL to measure the quality of the classroom experience”, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6 (1), pp. 115-133.
  13. Subotić, J., Gajić, O., Lungulov, B. (2011), Kvalitet visokog obrazovanja u društvu znanja: mogućnosti i perspektive. Tematski zbornik radova XVII međunarodnog naučnog skupa Tehnologija kultura i razvoj, Udruženje “Tehnologija i društvo”, Institut “Mihajlo Pupin”, Centar za istraţivanje razvoja nauke i tehnologije, Beograd i Ekonomski fakultet Subotica.
  14. McRae, K., Ochsner, K.N., Mauss, I.B., Gabrieli, J., Gross, J.J. (2008), “Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reapprais- al”, Group processes & intergroup relations: GPIR, 11 (2), pp. 143-162, DOI: 10.1177/1368430207088035
  15. Legčević, J. (2009), “Quality gap of educational services in viewpoints of students”, Ekonomska misao i praksa, 18 (2), pp. 279-298.
  16. Kourgiantakis, T., Sewell, K.M., Bogo, M. (2019), “The Importance of Feedback in Preparing Social Work Students for Field Education”, Clinical Social Work Journal, 47, pp. 124-133, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0671-8.
  17. Kinchin, I.M. (2014), “Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education: A critical analysis of recent reviews”, The Journal of Continuing Higher Educa- tion, 62 (1), pp. 39-49, https://10.1080/07377363.2014.872011.
  18. Jevremov, T., Lungulov, B., Dinić, B. (2016), “Zadovoljstvo studenata kvalitetom nastave: efekti godine studija i akademskog postignuća”, Nastava i vaspitanje, 65, pp. 491-508.
  19. Hess, U., Senécal, S., Kirouac, G., Herrera, P., Philippot, P., Kleck, R.E. (2000), “Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self­perceptions”, Cognition & Emotion, 14, pp. 609-642.
  20. Healey, M., Healey R.L. (2019), Students as partners guide: Student engagement through partnership. York: Advance HE, -- https://www. advance-he.ac.uk/news- and-views/student-engagement-throughpartnership.
  21. Healey, M., Flint, A., Harrington, K. (2014), Engagement through partnership: stu- dents as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy, -- https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engage- ment-through-partnership students partners-learning-and-teaching-higher.
  22. Healey, R.L. (2012), “The power of debates? Reflections on their potential for ge- ography in higher education: teaching for social transformation through debate”, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36 (2), pp. 239-25.
  23. Gross, J.J. (Ed) (2007), Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford.
  24. Gallifa, J., Batallé, P. (2010), “Student perceptions of service quality in a multi­ campus higher education system in Spain”, Quality Assurance in Education, 18 (2), pp. 156-170.
  25. Fischer, A.H. (1993), “Sex differences in emotionality: Fact or stereotype?”, Femi- nism Psychology, 3, pp. 303-318.
  26. Fabes, R.A., Martin, C.L. (1991), “Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, pp. 532-540.
  27. Faraz, A. (2014), “Exploring Perceptions of University Students Pertaining to Grades over Knowledge and Skills”, Journal of Education and Educational De- velopment, 1 (2), pp. 101-115,
  28. Faganel, A. (2010), “Quality perception gap inside the higher education institution”, International Journal of Academic Research, 2 (1), pp. 213-215.
  29. Donaldson, B., McNicholas, C. (2004), “Understanding the postgraduate educa- tion market for UK­based students: a review and empirical study”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9 (4), pp. 346-360.
  30. De Oliveira, O.J.D.E., Ferreira, E.C. (2009), Adaptation and application of the SERVQUAL scale in higher education. In Proceedings of POMS 20th Annual Conference, Orlando, pp. 1-20.
  31. Ćukušić, M., Garača, Ž. & Jadrić, M. (2014), “Odrednice i pokazatelji uspješnosti visokih učilišta u Hrvatskoj”, Društevan istraživanja, 23 (2), pp. 233-257.
  32. Chua, C. (2004, July), Perception of quality in higher education. In Proceedings of the Australian universities quality forum. Melbourne: AUQA Occasional Publi- cation, pp. 1-7.
  33. Briton, N., Hall, J. (1995), “Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communica- tion”, Sex Roles, 32, pp. 79-90.
  34. Boring, A. (2017), “Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching”, Journal of Public Economics, 145, pp. 27-41.
  35. Barnes, B. R. (2006), “Analysing service quality: the case of postgraduate Chinese stu- dents”, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18 (3), pp. 313-331.
  36. Arambewela, R., Hall, J. (2006), “A comparative analysis of international education satisfaction using servqual”, Journal of Service Research, 6, July, pp. 141-163.
  37. Angell, R.J., Heffernan, T.W., Megicks, P. (2008), “Service quality in postgraduate education”, Quality Assurance in Education, 16 (3), pp. 236-254.
  38. Westerheijden, D.F. (2007), States and Europe and quality of higher education. In
  39. D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, M.J. Rosa (Eds), Quality assurance in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer, str. 73-98.
  40. Yea, K. (2019), Interactive techniques, -- https://www.usf.edu/atle/ documents/hand-out-interactive-techniques.pdf.
  41. Zafiropoulos, C., Vrana, V. (2008), “Service quality assessment in a Greek higher education institute”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9 (1), pp. 33-45.

Maja S. Vukadinovic, Natasa Papic-Blagojevic, Ana Jovicic Vukovic, The effect of demographic variables on the assessment of cooperation and objectivity of the teaching process of higher education institutions in "CADMO" 2/2022, pp 72-84, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2022-002005