Analitico, sintetico e a priori: questioni di forma. Il dibattito tra fenomenologia husserliana e empirismo logico
Titolo Rivista: RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA 
Autori/Curatori: Davide Bordini 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2011 Fascicolo: 2  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  26 P. 205-230 Dimensione file:  723 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SF2011-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

 



This article sketches out the key features of the debate on the analytic-synthetic distinction between phenomenology and logical empiricism, which took place in the early part of the twentieth century. On the one side, the author reconstructs the debate itself from an historical angle; on the other, he gives a theoretical account of the different positions and arguments. In particular, he has three main aims: a) to clarify how, according to Husserl, the analyticsynthetic opposition is to be understood as the form-matter opposition; b) to show how this position has been misunderstood by neo-empiricist philosophers, in particular by Schlick in his paper against the theory of the factual a priori; c) to point out that Husserlian theory anticipates some relevant features in the matter of analyticity (i.e. the distinction between logical analytic and extra-logical analytic truths) which will be made fully explicit only by Carnap and Quine, philosophers of the following generation.
Keywords: Analyticity, analytic/synthetic distinction, Husserl, a priori, phenomenology, logical empiricism



  1. Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found.

Davide Bordini, in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 2/2011, pp. 205-230, DOI:10.3280/SF2011-002001

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche