Click here to download

The causal attributions and clinical assessment in forensic psychiatry and juridical psychology
Journal Title: RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA 
Author/s: Alessandro Salvini, Antonio Iudici 
Year:  2011 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  13 Pg. 69-81 FullText PDF:  750 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RSF2011-002006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The present study has dealt with these knowledge processes by which psychologists and psychiatrists engaged in psychodiagnostic assessment of technical advice and legal expertise. These processes have been traditionally neglected by the clinical-forensic depriving professionals a useful interdisciplinary confrontation and making some dubious scientific and technical arrangements for psychodiagnostic assessment. Specifically we wanted to highlight the errors where the forensic specialist can incur when responding to the questions posed by clients legal, both of the errors of attribution and of inferences, both in the epistemological incongruities.
Keywords: Systematic errors of judgment, attribution error, inferences, epistemological incongruities, psychodiagnostic assessment, legal expertise

Alessandro Salvini, Antonio Iudici, The causal attributions and clinical assessment in forensic psychiatry and juridical psychology in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 2/2011, pp. 69-81, DOI:10.3280/RSF2011-002006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content