Click here to download

Mathematics and Rhetoric
Journal Title: PARADIGMI 
Author/s: Cesare Cozzo 
Year:  2011 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  14 Pg. 59-72 FullText PDF:  518 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PARA2011-003005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The traditional opposition between mathematical proof and rhetorical argument is based on a non-contextual picture of mathematical proof, against which historical and theoretical objections have been raised. The author advocates a different opposition, between epistemic rhetoric and instrumental rhetoric. Instrumental rhetoric aims at persuasion without caring for truth. Epistemic rhetoric is a practice aimed at both persuasion and truth. Aiming at truth is a way of acting, which can be characterized in terms of epistemically virtuous behavioural traits. In this sense epistemic rhetoric aims at truth, even though it is contextual and addressed to a particular audience. Real life mathematical proofs are instances of epistemic rhetoric and contextual rigour. But it is right to contrast proofs with the arguments of instrumental rhetoric.
Keywords: Aiming-at-truth, Epistemic virtues, Mathematical proof, Rhetorical argument

Cesare Cozzo, Mathematics and Rhetoric in "PARADIGMI" 3/2011, pp. 59-72, DOI:10.3280/PARA2011-003005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content