Click here to download

Amori on line. Incontrarsi, frequentarsi e lasciarsi con la mediazione della Rete Internet
Journal Title: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Author/s: Laura Arosio 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  27 Pg. 77-103 FullText PDF:  144 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2013-002005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The present study aims to provide a conceptual framework to interpret some emergent behaviors in couple relationships that occur through the mediation of the Internet, such as digital dating, electronic interactions, cybersex, online infidelity. These phenomena are read in the light of classical themes and basic concepts of sociology such as: the study of marriage markets, the dynamics of mate selection, identity and social roles, relationship development and dissolution. Some methodological issues are also introduced on how the online personal relationships can be empirically investigated.
Keywords: Online personal relationships; digital dating; cybersex; online infidelity; Internet as a marriage market; Internet and social research

  1. Ahuvia A.C. e Adelman M.B. (1992). Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54: 452- 463, 10.2307/353076DOI: 10.2307/353076
  2. Arosio L. (2006). La diversità crea fragilità? Un approfondimento sulle cause dell’instabilità coniugale. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3: 441-464.
  3. Arosio L. (2008). Sociologia del matrimonio. Roma: Carocci
  4. Arosio L. (2010a). L’uso dei documenti. In: de Lillo A., a cura di, Il mondo della ricerca qualitativa. Torino: Utet: 145-182.
  5. Arosio L. (2010b). Personal documents on the Internet: what’s new and what’s old. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 1 (2): 23-38, testo disponibile al sito: http://doctorat.sas.unibuc.ro/wp-content/ uploads/2010/11/Issue2_LauraArosio_Documents.pdf.
  6. Arosio L. (2012). Antichi strumenti per moderne navigazioni: una riflessione sulla sociologia che fa uso di Internet. In: Cipolla C., de Lillo A. e Ruspini E., a cura di, Il sociologo le sirene e gli avatar. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 17-32
  7. Baker A. (1998). Cyberspace couples finding romance online then meeting for the first time in real life. CMC Magazine, testo disponibile al sito: www.december. com/cmc/mag/1998/jul/baker.html.
  8. Baker A. (2002). What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5 (4): 363-375, 10.1089/109493102760275617DOI: 10.1089/109493102760275617
  9. Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y. e Fitzsimons G.M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1): 33-48, 10.1111/1540-4560.00247DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00247
  10. Bauman Z. (1993). Postmodern Ethics. Cambridge: Polity
  11. Bauman Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press. (trad. it.: Amore liquido. Sulla fragilità dei legami affettivi. Roma- Bari: Laterza, 2004).
  12. Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. (1990). Das ganz normale Chaos der Liebe. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (trad. it.: Il normale caos dell’amore. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1996).
  13. Bennato D. (2011). Sociologia dei media digitali. Relazioni sociali e processi comunicativi del web partecipativo. Roma Bari: Laterza
  14. Benshop A. (2003). Cyberstalking: menaced on the Internet. Sociosite, testo disponibile al sito: www.sociosite.org/cyberstalking_en.php
  15. Benschop A. (1997). NetLove and CyberSex The (im)possibilities of bodiless intimacy. Sociosite, testo disponibile al sito: www.sociosite.org/love.php.
  16. Ben-Ze’ev A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9780511489785DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489785
  17. Cantelmi T. e Carpino V. (2005). Tradimento on line. Limite reale e virtuale dell’amore. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  18. Capecchi S. e Ruspini E., a cura di (2009). Media, corpi, sessualità. Dai corpi esibiti al cybersex. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Chenault B.G. (1998). Developing personal and emotional relationships via computer- mediated communication. CMC Magazine, testo disponibile al sito: www.december.com/cmc/mag/1998/may/chenault.html.
  20. Chesebro J.W. (1985). Computer-mediated interpersonal communication. In: Ruben B.D., a cura di, Information and Behavior. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  21. Cipolla C., a cura di (1998). Il ciclo metodologico della ricerca sociale. Bologna: il Mulino
  22. Cooper A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1 (2): 181-187, 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187DOI: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187
  23. Cooper A. e Sportolari L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22 (1): 7-14.
  24. Cooper A., Boies S., Maheu M. e Greenfield D. (2000). Sexuality and the Internet: The next sexual revolution. In: Muscarella, F. e Szuchman, L., a cura di, Psychological Perspectives on Human Sexuality: A Research Based Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons
  25. Coupland J. (1996). Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse and Society, 7: 187-207, 10.1177/0957926596007002003DOI: 10.1177/0957926596007002003
  26. De Lillo A., Arosio L., de Luca S., Ruspini E. e Sala E. (2010). L’osservazione. In: de Lillo A., a cura di, Il mondo della ricerca qualitativa. Torino: Utet: 35-76.
  27. Dibbell J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace. The Village Voice, 21 december 1993
  28. Di Maggio P., Hargittai E., Russell-Neuman W. e Robinson J.P. (2001). The social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 307-336, 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
  29. Dutton W. E. (1996). Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  30. Ellison N., Heino R. e Gibbs J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 11 (2), testo disponibile al sito: http://jcmc.indiana. edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
  31. Fiore A.R.T. (2010). Self-presentation, Interpersonal Perception, and Partner Selection in Computer-mediated Relationship Formation, Dissertation Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, testo disponibile al sito: www.msu.edu/~atf/papers/Andrew_Fiore_dissertation.pdf.
  32. Gibbs J.L., Ellison N.B. e Heino R.D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33 (2): 1-26, 10.1177/0093650205285368DOI: 10.1177/0093650205285368
  33. Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press
  34. Giddens A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press. (trad. it. La trasformazione dell’intimità: sessualità, amore ed erotismo nelle società moderne. il Mulino: Bologna, 1995).
  35. Glass S.P. e Wright T.L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29: 361-387, 10.1080/00224499209551654DOI: 10.1080/00224499209551654
  36. Goffman E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre: Anchor Books Edition
  37. Goffman E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48: 1- 17, 10.2307/2095141DOI: 10.2307/2095141
  38. Gottlieb L. (2006). How do I love thee? The Atlantic Monthly: 58-70
  39. Hardey M. (2002). Life beyond the screen: embodiment and identity through the Internet. The Sociological Review, 50: 570-585, 10.1111/1467-954X.00399DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.00399
  40. Hertlein K.M. e Sendak S. (2007). Love Bytes: Intimacy in Computer-Mediated Relationships, testo disponibile al sito: www.inter-disciplinary.net/ptb/persons/ pil/pil1/hertleinsendak%20paper.pdf.
  41. Heim M. (1992). The erotic ontology of cyberspace. In: Benedict M., a cura di, Cyberspace, First Steps. Cambridge: MIT Press
  42. Hellerstein J.E. (1985). The social use of electronic communication at a major university. Computers and the Social Sciences, 1 (3): 191-197.
  43. Hine C., a cura di (2005). Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford-New York: Berg
  44. Hine C. (2008). The Internet and research methods. In: Gilbert N., a cura di, Researching Social Life. London: Sage
  45. Jagger E. (1998). Marketing the self buying an other dating in a postmodern consumer society. Sociology, 32 (4): 795-814, 10.1177/0038038598032004009DOI: 10.1177/0038038598032004009
  46. Jerin R. e Dolinsky B. (2001). You’ve got mail! You don’t want it: cyber-victimization and on-line dating. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 9 (1): 15-21, testo disponibile al sito: www.albany.edu/scj/jcjpc/vol9is1/ jerin.pdf.
  47. Jones S., a cura di (1995). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  48. Jones S., a cura di (1998). Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. London: Sage, 10.1108/10662249810231069DOI: 10.1108/10662249810231069
  49. Jones W.H. e Burdette M.P. (1994). Betrayal in relationships. In: Weber A.L. e Harvey J.H., a cura di, Perspectives on close relationships. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  50. Kalmijn M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 395-421, 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395
  51. Katz J. e Aspden P. (1997). A nation of strangers: Patterns of friendship and involvement in Internet users. Communication of the ACM, 40 (12): 81-86, 10.1145/265563.265575DOI: 10.1145/265563.265575
  52. Kendall T.D. (2010). The relationship between Internet access and divorce rate. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2: 1-12
  53. Kiesler S. (1984). Computer mediation of conversation. American Psychologist, 39: 1123-1134, 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
  54. Kiesler S., Siegel J. e McGuire T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10): 1123- 1134, 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
  55. Kim J.Y. (2000). Social interaction in computer-mediated communication. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 26: 15-17, 10.1002/bult.153DOI: 10.1002/bult.153
  56. Lea M. e Spears R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In: Wood J.T. e Duck S., a cura di, Understudied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  57. Lee R.M. (2000). Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research. Open University Press
  58. Leiblum S.R. (2001). Women sex and the Internet. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 16: 389-405, 10.1080/14681990126954DOI: 10.1080/14681990126954
  59. MacKenzie D.A. e Wajcman J. (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press
  60. MacKinnon R.C. (1992). Searching for the Leviathan in Usenet. Master’s thesis, San Jose State University
  61. Mann C., Stuart F. (2000). Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. London: Sage
  62. Maheu M. e Subotnik R.B. (2001). Infidelity and the Internet: Virtual Relationship and Real Betrayal. New York: Sourcebooks.
  63. Mantovani F. (2001). Cyber-attraction: the emergence of computer-mediated communication in the development of interpersonal relationships. In Anolli L., Ciceri R. e Riva G., a cura di, Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication. IOS Press.
  64. Matheson K. (1991). Social cues in computer-mediated communication: gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7: 137-145, 10.1016/0747-5632(91)90003-JDOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(91)90003-J
  65. McLaughlin M., Osbourne K. e Ellison N. (1997). Virtual community in a telepresence environment. In: Jones S., a cura di, Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  66. Merkle E. e Richardson R. (2000). Digital dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49 (2): 187-192, 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00187.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00187.x
  67. Mileham B.L.A. (2007). Online infidelity in Internet chat rooms: an ethnographic exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 11-31, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.033DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.033
  68. Norris P. (2001). Digital divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  69. Oldenburg R. (1989). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You Through the Day. New York: Paragon House
  70. Paccagnella L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3 (1), testo disponibile al sito: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/ issue1/paccagnella.html
  71. Paccagnella L. (2000). La comunicazione al computer. Bologna: il Mulino
  72. Parks M.R. e Floyd K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46 (1): 80-97, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.x
  73. Parsi M.R. (2000). Chat ti amo. Firenze: Giunti
  74. Rheingold H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley
  75. Rice R.E. e Love G. (1987). Electronic emotion: socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14 (1): 85-108, 10.1177/009365087014001005DOI: 10.1177/009365087014001005
  76. Roberts L.D. (2009). Cyber-victimisation. In Luppicini R. e Adell R., a cura di, Handbook of Research on Technoethics. Hershey USA: Information Science Reference
  77. Rowe N.C. (2005). Types of online deception. In: Dasgupta S., a cura di, Encyclopedia of Virtual Communities and Technologies, Hershey, PA: The Idea Group, 10.4018/978-1-59140-563-4.ch064DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-563-4.ch064
  78. Sartori L. (2006). Il divario digitale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  79. Schnarch D. (1997). Sex, intimacy, and the Internet. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22: 15-20
  80. Schneider J.P. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7 (1-2): 31-58
  81. Shaughnessy K., Byers E.S. e Walsh L. (2011). Online sexual activity experience in heterosexual students: Gender similarities and differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40: 419-427, 10.1007/s10508-010-9629-9DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9629-9
  82. Shaughnessy K. (2012). In focus: sexuality on the Internet. In: Hyde J.S., DeLamater J.D. e Byers E.S., a cura di, Understanding human sexuality. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
  83. Skopek J. e Schulz F., Blossfeld H.P. (2010). Who contacts whom? Educational homophily in online mate selection. European Sociological Review, 27 (2): 180-195, 10.1093/esr/jcp068DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcp068
  84. Smith M.A. (1992). Voices from the WELL: The Logic of the Virtual Commons. Master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles
  85. Sobotka T. e Toulemon L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19 (6): 85-138, 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6
  86. Spears R. e Lea M (1992). Social influence and the influence of the social in computer-mediated communication. In Lea M., a cura di, Contexts of computer- mediated communication. Hemel-Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf
  87. Sprecher S., Schwartz P., Harvey J. e Hatfield E. (2008). Thebusinessoflove.com: Relationship Initiation at Internet MatchMaking Services. In: Sprecher S., Wenzel A. e Harvey J., a cura di, The Handbook of relationship initiation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum
  88. Stevenson B. e Wolfers J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (2): 27-52, 10.3386/w12944DOI: 10.3386/w12944
  89. Stoll C. (1995). Silicon Snake Oil: Second Thoughts on the Information Highway. New York: Anchor Books
  90. Turkle S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24: 50-57.
  91. Underwood H. e Findlay B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships. Behavior Change, 21 (2):127-140, 10.1375/bech.21.2.127.55422DOI: 10.1375/bech.21.2.127.55422
  92. Utz S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1 (1), testo disponibile al sito: www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
  93. Van Dijk J. (2002). Sociologia dei nuovi media. Bologna: il Mulino
  94. Vozar M. (2011). Marriage dot EU: the effect of Internet usage on marriage hazard, CERGE-EI Working Paper Series, 444, testo disponibile al sito: www.cerge-ei.cz/pdf/wp/Wp444.pdf
  95. Wall D., a cura di (2001). Crime and the Internet: Cybercrimes and Cyber Fears. New York: Routledge.
  96. Walther J.B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57: 381-399, 10.1080/10570319309374463DOI: 10.1080/10570319309374463
  97. Walther J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23: 3-43, 10.1177/009365096023001001DOI: 10.1177/009365096023001001
  98. Walther J.B. e Tidwell L.C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effects of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5 (4), 355-378, 10.1080/10919399509540258DOI: 10.1080/10919399509540258
  99. Waskul D.D., a cura di (2004). Net.SeXXX: Readings on Sex, Pornography, and the Internet. New York: Peter Lang
  100. Whitty M.T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: men’s and women’s attitudes towards online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6 (6): 569-579, 10.1089/109493103322725342DOI: 10.1089/109493103322725342
  101. Whitty M.T. (2004). Shopping for love on the Internet: men and women’s experiences of using an Australian Internet dating site, Communication Research in the Public Interest. New Orleans: ICA.
  102. Williams M. (1996). Intimacy and the Internet. Contemporary Sexuality, 30 (9): 1-11.
  103. Woolgar S. (1996). Technologies as cultural artifacts. In: Dutton W., a cura di, Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  104. Wysocki D.K. (1996). Somewhere Over the Modem: Interpersonal Relationships Over Computer Bulletin Boards. Santa Barbara: University of California
  105. Wysocki D.K. (1998). Let your fingers do the talking: sex on an adult chat-line. Sexualities, 1: 425-452, 10.1177/136346098001004003DOI: 10.1177/136346098001004003
  106. Young K. (1999). The evaluation and treatment of Internet addiction. In: Vande- Creek L. e Thomas L., a cura di, Innovations in clinical practice: A source book. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press
  107. Young K.S., Griffin-Shelley E., Cooper A., O’Mara J. e Buchanan J. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 7 (1): 59-74
  108. Young M.E. e Long L.L. (1998). Counseling and Therapy for Couples. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company

Laura Arosio, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2013, pp. 77-103, DOI:10.3280/SES2013-002005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content