Click here to download

Reducing asymmetry in doctor-patient interaction: patients’ initiatives in specialised clinical encounters
Journal Title: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Author/s: Piera Margutti, Renata Galatolo 
Year:  2013 Issue: 1EN Language: English 
Pages:  18 Pg. 23-40 FullText PDF:  369 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2013-001003EN
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This study identifies a specific multimodal practice that patients use during medical encounters with a team of doctor in an Italian specialized centre for prosthesis construction and application. Focusing on the early stages of these encounters, the paper analyses the way in which patients delicately orchestrate their gaze, gesture and verbal behaviour to gain some extra speaking space, beyond that of mere respondents to doctors’ questions. By using Conversation Analysis, we show that patients produce this recurrent multimodal pattern, in methodically produced and recognizable ways. Patients manage to acquire the interactional role of "action initiators"; thus constraining doctors to respond: for instance, by producing unrequested information about their health status, by correcting implicit assumptions in the doctors’ questions, or by producing independent assessments. The paper contributes to previous research on patients’ agency and initiative, revising the notion of asymmetry in medical settings and highlighting the active role of the patient in every stage of these encounters.
Keywords: Patient initiative, asymmetry, mitigation, multimodality, medical interaction, specialized medical encounters

  1. Atkinson J. M. and Heritage J., editors (1984). Structures of Social Actions: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  2. Boyd E., Heritage J. (2006). Taking the Patient's Medical History: Questioning During Comprehensive History Taking. In: Heritage J. and Maynard D. editors, Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,, 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008
  3. Brown P., Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Brown P., Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Caffi C. (2001). La mitigazione. Un approccio pragmatico alla comunicazione nei contesti terapeutici. Münster: LIT Verlag
  6. Costello B. A., Roberts F. (2001). Medical Recommendations as Joint Social Practice. Health Communication 13, 3: 241-260, 10.1207/S15327027HC1303_2DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1303_2
  7. Drew P. and Heritage J. editors (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Studies in Interactional Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  8. Gili Fivela B. e Bazzanella C., editors (2009). Fenomeni di intensità nell’italiano parlato. Firenze: Franco Cesati Editore
  9. Gill V. (1998). Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients' explanations for illness and doctors' responses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 4: 342
  10. Gill V., Maynard D. (2006). Patients' Explanations for Health problems and physicians' Responsiveness in the Medical Interview. In: Heritage J. and Maynard D., editors, Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Have ten P. (1991). Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the ``asymmetry'' of doctor-patient interaction. In: Boden D. and Zimmerman D. H., editors, Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
  12. Lindström A., Mondada L., editors (2009). Assessments in Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 4: 299-308, 10.1080/08351810903296457DOI: 10.1080/08351810903296457
  13. Pomerantz A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: Atkinson J. M. and Heritage J., editors, Structures of Social Actions: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  14. Robinson J. D. (2001). Asymmetry in action: Sequential resources in the negotiation of a prescription request. Text, 2, 1/2: 19-54, 10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.19DOI: 10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.19

Piera Margutti, Renata Galatolo, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1EN/2013, pp. 23-40, DOI:10.3280/SES2013-001003EN

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content