Click here to download

Detection and identification of obstacles with different degrees of predictability in drivig
Journal Title: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Author/s: Alice Cancer, Carlo Alberto Meinero, Alessandro Antonietti 
Year:  2012 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  14 Pg. 639-652 FullText PDF:  270 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2012-004004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The main aim of this research is to investigate reaction times of licensed subjects in a simulated driving context in order to evaluate the influence of the obstacle predictability level. Reaction times were measured during two different tasks: simple obstacle detection and obstacle identification (and naming). The results show an effect of the stimulus predictability on reaction times in both conditions (a bigger effect is recorded with unpredictable stimulus). Besides, a discrep ancy between detection and identification times depending on the stimulus predictability was observed.
Keywords: Traffic psychology, driving simulation, reaction times, stimulus predictability

  1. Antonietti, A. (2009). Percezione e riconoscimento del pericolo nell’incidente stradale. Atti dell convegno dell’Associazione per lo Studio e l’Analisi degli Incidenti Stradali (ASAIS) e di EVU Italia-Country Group Italiano di EVU. Milano, 31 ottobre 2009, pp. 75-92.
  2. Blais, A.R., & Weber, E.U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.
  3. Chapman, P., & Underwood, G. (1998). Visual search of driving situations: Danger and expertise. Perception, 27, 951-964., 10.1068/p270951DOI: 10.1068/p270951
  4. Crundall, D., Underwood, G., & Chapman, P. (2002). Attending to the peripheral world while driving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 459-475., 10.1002/acp.806DOI: 10.1002/acp.806
  5. Greenshields, B.D. (1936). Reaction time in automobile driving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(3), 355-361., 10.1037/h0063672DOI: 10.1037/h0063672
  6. Greenshields, B.D. (1961). Investigating traffic, highway events in relation to driver-actions. Traffic Quarterly, 15, 664-676.
  7. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
  8. Rivano, V. (2009). Ricostruzione della dinamica degli incidenti stradali. Le indagini, Firenze: University Press.
  9. Triggs, T., & Harris, W. (1982). Reaction time of drivers to road stimuli. Monash University, Human Factors Report HFR-12.
  10. Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Berger, Z., & Crundall D. (2003). Driving experience, attentional focusing, and the recall of recently inspected events. Transportation Research, Part. F 6, 289-304., 10.1016/j.trf.2003.09.002DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2003.09.002
  11. Vangi, D., & Rivano, V. (2011). Il tempo di reazione del conducente: cause di variabilità. In Vangi, D., Rivano, V. (Eds.), Ricostruzione della dinamica di incidenti stradali. Firenze: University Press.

Alice Cancer, Carlo Alberto Meinero, Alessandro Antonietti, Detection and identification of obstacles with different degrees of predictability in drivig in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 4/2012, pp. 639-652, DOI:10.3280/RIP2012-004004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content