Clicca qui per scaricare

The mechanism of altruism: theoretical, structural and temporal considerations for understanding blood donor altruistic motivations il meccanismo dell'altruismo:
Titolo Rivista: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Autori/Curatori: Eamonn Ferguson 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2012 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  12 P. 713-724 Dimensione file:  195 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2012-004009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


A fuller understanding of ‘altruism’ associated with blood donation requires understanding how the mechanisms of altruism described by theoretical models in biology, economics and psychology pertain to blood donor behaviour. In a brief overview of the literature I identify seven classes of mechanism and use these to describe the structural geography of blood donors’ altruistic motivational mechanisms. I argue that games from behavioural economics, such as dictator games, should start to be used as behavioural indices of altruistic preferences to supplement self-reports. Indeed, an open question is whether self-reported motivations or behavioural preference are better predictors of future donation. I further develop a series of temporal questions concerning the stability of such motives across the donor career and their changing pattern of prediction. Finally, I discuss methods of demonstrating the causal status of motivations and associated interventions.

La comprensione dei meccanismi altruistici associati alla donazione di sangue chiede di comprendere come i meccanismi descritti dai modelli teorici utilizzati nelle scienze biologiche, economiche e psicologiche siano pertinenti anche alla donazione di sangue. Attraverso una breve panoramica della letteratura, l'autore si sofferma su sette categorie, al fine di descrivere la forma strutturale dei meccanismi motivazionali altruistici dei donatori di sangue. Oltre a cio l'autore sostiene che, ad integrazione degli usuali strumenti self report, i giochi di economia comportamentale, come il Dictator Game, dovrebbero essere utilizzati quali indici comportamentali di preferenze altruistiche. A proposito di predittori di futura donazione, e dibattuta la questione se optare per le motivazioni auto riportate o per le preferenze comportamentali. Per ulteriori approfondimenti in questa direzione, e necessario considerare come gli elementi temporali incidano sulla stabilita delle motivazioni durante la "carriera" dei donatori, oltre che arricchire la riflessione sui metodi utilizzati per dimostrare la connessione tra lo stato causale delle motivazioni e gli interventi ad essi associati.
Keywords: Donatori di sangue, giochi economici, predittivita del comportamento, motivazioni.

  1. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100, 464-4877., 10.2307/2234133DOI: 10.2307/2234133
  2. Angrist, J.D., & Krueger, A.B. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification. From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives,15, 69-85., 10.1257/jep.15.4.69DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.4.69
  3. Bar-Tal, D. (1985-1987). Altruistic motivation to help: definition, utility and operationalization. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 13, 3-14.
  4. Bascle, G. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6, 285-327., 10.1177/1476127008094339DOI: 10.1177/1476127008094339
  5. Batson, C.D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Bednall, T.C., & Bove, L.L. (2010). Donating blood: a meta-analytic review of self-reported motivators and deterrents. Transfusion Medicine Review, 25, 317-334., 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.04.005DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.04.005
  7. Benz, M., & Meier, S. (2008). Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics, 11, 268-281., 10.1007/s10683-007-9192-yDOI: 10.1007/s10683-007-9192-y
  8. Bound, J., Jaeger, D.A., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variable estimation when correlations between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443-450., 10.2307/2291055DOI: 10.2307/2291055
  9. Clary, E.G., & Snyder, M. (1999). Motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and Practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 156-159., 10.1111/1467-8721.00037DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00037
  10. Clary, E.G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R.D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A.A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516-1530., 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
  11. Crumpler, H., & Grossman, P.J. (2008). An experimental test of warm glow giving. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1011-1021., 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.014DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.014
  12. Eckel, C.C., & Grossman, P.J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181-191., 10.1006/game.1996.0081DOI: 10.1006/game.1996.0081
  13. Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: a meta-study. Experimental Economics., 10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7DOI: 10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
  14. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gachter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13, 1-25., 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7DOI: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7
  15. Fehr, E., & Rockenbach, B. (2003). Detrimental effect of sanction on human altruism. Nature, 422, 137-140., 10.1038/nature01474DOI: 10.1038/nature01474
  16. Fehler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2013). Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness: Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 4,139-145., 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.005DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.005
  17. Ferguson, E. (1996). Predictors of future behaviour: A review of the psychological literature on blood donation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 287-308., 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00510.xDOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00510.x
  18. Ferguson, E., & Bibby PA. (2002). Predicting future blood donor returns: past behavior, intentions and observer effects. Health Psychology, 21, 513-518., 10.1037/0278-6133.21.5.513DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.21.5.513
  19. Ferguson, E., & Chandler, S. (2005). A stage model of blood donor behaviour: Assessing voluntary behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 359-372., 10.1177/1359105305051423DOI: 10.1177/1359105305051423
  20. Ferguson, E., Atsma, F., de Kort, W., & Veldhuizen, I. (2012a). Exploring the Pattern of Blood Donor Beliefs in First Time, Novice and Experienced Donors: Differentiating Reluctant Altruism, Pure Altruism, Impure Altruism and Warm-Glow. Transfusion, 52, 343-355., 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03279.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03279.x
  21. Ferguson, E., Farrell, K., & Lawrence, C. (2008). Blood Donation is an act of Benevolence Rather Than Altruism. Health Psychology, 27, 327-336., 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.327DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.327
  22. Ferguson, E., France, C.R., Abraham, C., Ditto, B., & Sheeran, P. (2007). Improving Blood Donor Recruitment and Retention: Integrating Social and Behavioral Science Agendas. Transfusion, 47, 1999-2010., 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01423.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01423.x
  23. Ferguson, E., Taylor, M., Keatley, D., Flynn, N., & Lawrence, C. (2012b). Blood Donors’ Helping Behavior is Driven by Warm Glow More Evidence For the Blood Donor Benevolence Hypothesis. Transfusion, 52, 2189-2200., 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03557.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03557.x
  24. Fernandez-Montoya, A., Lopez-Berrio, A., & Luna del Castillo, J.D. (1997). How some attitudes, beliefs and motivations of Spanish blood donors evolve over time. Vox Sanguinis, 74,140-147., 10.1046/j.1423-0410.1998.7430140.xDOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.1998.7430140.x
  25. Fong, C.M. (2007). Evidence from an experiment on charity to welfare recipients: reciprocity, altruism and the empathic responsiveness hypothesis. Economic Journal, 117, 1008-24., 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02076.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02076.x
  26. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J.L., Savin, N.E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347-369., 10.1006/game.1994.1021DOI: 10.1006/game.1994.1021
  27. Glynn, S.A., Kleinman, S.H., Schreiber, G.B., Zuck, T., Combs, S.M., Bethel, J., Garratty, G., & Williams, A.E. (2002). Motivations to donate blood: demographic comparisons. Transfusion, 42, 216-251., 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00008.DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00008.
  28. Greenland, S. (2000). An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 722-729., 10.1093/ije/29.4.722DOI: 10.1093/ije/29.4.722
  29. Griffin, A.S., & West, S.A. (2002). Kin Selection: Fact and Fiction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 15-21., 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02355-2DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02355-2
  30. Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I+II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52., 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
  31. Heckman, J.J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Economerica, 47, 153-161., 10.2307/1912352DOI: 10.2307/1912352
  32. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspectives: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 28, 795-855., 10.1017/S0140525X05000142DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X05000142
  33. Kuruvatti ,J., Prasad, V., Williams, R., Harrison, M.A., & Jones., R.P. (2011). Motivations for donating blood and reasons why people lapse or never donate in Leeds, England: a 2001 questionnaire-based survey. Vox Sanguinis, 101, 333-338., 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01488.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01488.x
  34. Lemmens, K.P., Abraham, C., Ruiter, R.A., Ruiter, R.A., Veldhuizen, I.J., Dehling, C.J., Hoekstra, T., Bos, A.E., & Schaalma, H.P. (2009). Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 71-90., 10.1348/000712608X310237DOI: 10.1348/000712608X310237
  35. Little, R.J., Long, Q., & Lin, X. (2009). A comparison of methods for estimating the causal effect of a treatment in randomized clinical trials subject to noncompliance. Biometrics, 65, 640-649., 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01066.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01066.x
  36. Lyle, H.F., Smith, E.A., & Sullivan, R.J. (2009). Blood donations as costly signals of donor quality. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 263-286., 10.1556/JEP.7.2009.4.1DOI: 10.1556/JEP.7.2009.4.1
  37. Milinski, M., Semmann & Krambeck, HJ. (2002). Donor to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 269, 881-883., 10.1098/rspb.2002.1964DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1964
  38. Nowak, M.A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560-1563., 10.1126/science.1133755DOI: 10.1126/science.1133755
  39. Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Science, 437, 1291-1298.
  40. Omoto, A.M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 671-686., 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.671DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.671
  41. Piliavin, J.A., & Callero, P.L. (1991). Giving blood: the development of an altruistic identity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  42. Sober, E., & Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  43. Srivastava, S., John, O.P., Gosling, S.D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.84, 1041-1053., 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041
  44. Sussman, J.B., & Hayward, R.A. (2009). Using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomized controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 340, 1181-1184., 10.1136/bmj/c2073DOI: 10.1136/bmj/c2073
  45. Thoemmes, F.J., & Kim, E.S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in eth social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90-118., 10.1080/00273171.2011.540475DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.540475
  46. Titmuss, R.M. (1971). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. New York: Pantheon.
  47. Vaidya, J.G., Gray E.K., Haig, J., & Watson, D. (2002). On the temporal stability of personality: evidence for differential stability and the role of life experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.83, 1469-1484.
  48. Veldhuizen, I., Ferguson, E., de Kort, W., Donders, R., Atsma, F. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the context of blood donation: Does donation experience make a difference? Transfusion, 51, 2425-2437., 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03165.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03165.x
  49. Waibel, M., Floreano, D., & Keller, L. (2011). A Quantitative Test of Hamilton’s Rule for the Evolution of Altruism. PLoS Biol, 9:e1000615., 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000615DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000615
  50. Wildman, J., & Hollingsworth, B. (2009). Blood donation and the nature of altruism. Journal of Health Economics, 28, 492-503., 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.005DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.005
  51. Yuan, S., Hoffman, M., Lu, Q., Goldfinger, D., & Ziman, A. (2011). Motivating factors and deterrents for blood donation among donors at a university campus-based collection center. Transfusion, 51, 2438-2444., 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03174.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03174.x
  52. Zahavi, A (1975). Mate selection- a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214., 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
  53. Zahavi, A. (1995). Altruism as a handicap - the limitations of kin selection and reciprocity. Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 1-3., 10.2307/3677205DOI: 10.2307/3677205

Eamonn Ferguson, in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 4/2012, pp. 713-724, DOI:10.3280/RIP2012-004009

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche