Click here to download

Designing Research Evaluation: a View from the Perspective of a Large, Multidisciplinary University in the United States of America
Journal Title: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Author/s: J. Britt Holbrook 
Year:  2012 Issue: 52 Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 39-54 FullText PDF:  502 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2012-052004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This paper presents a view of research evaluation from the perspective of a large, multidisciplinary public university in the United States. Faced with increasing demands for accountability to the public, such universities currently lack adequate approaches to research evaluation. In fact, many of the approaches to research evaluation tend to rely on disciplinary standards for what counts as excellent research. Although these standards protect the autonomy of disciplines, departments, and faculty members, they do not speak to a notion of accountability that goes beyond accountability to academic peers. Public universities in the US should follow the example of the US National Science Foundation and find a way to incorporate concerns for broader societal impacts into their approaches to research evaluation.
Keywords: United States, Universities, National Science Foundation, Evaluation, Impact, Autonomy, Accountability

J. Britt Holbrook, in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 52/2012, pp. 39-54, DOI:10.3280/RIV2012-052004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content