Click here to download

For a new dialogue between psychology and school: theoretical and methodological issues
Journal Title: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Author/s: Stefano Cacciamani 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  5 Pg. 127-131 FullText PDF:  159 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2013-01007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Psychology - Parisi claims - pays little attention to the cultural and relational aspects of learning and to the study of the use of technological artifacts as learn- ing facilitators. For these reasons it has difficulties to make contributions to the school activities. In recent years, however, in the field of the psychology of education, we have seen the development of theoretical models that consider the cultural dimension (e.g. the work of Bruner and Gardner) and the use of technology (such as in the case of the Community of Learners and Knowledge Building Community) in educational settings. However, these theoretical models rarely have been accepted within the school practice, especially for issues related to the research methods. We need to go beyond the use of methods oriented to make research activities "in" school, to point to a research that is actually "for" school. Particularly promising is today the methodological approach called "Design Based Research", which is characterized by the creation of multi-professional research teams, composed of researchers and teachers, and thus able to promote an effective dialogue between the research community and schools.
Keywords: Theoretical models, research methods, Design Based Research

  1. Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher 41, 16-25., DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
  2. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. Mc Gilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press/Bradford Books.
  3. Bruner, J. (1997). La cultura dell’educazione. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  4. Gardner, H. (1987). Formae mentis. Saggio sulla pluralità dell’intelligenza. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  5. Gardner, H. (1999). Educare al comprendere. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  6. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a knowledge society (pp.76-98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
  7. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C.(1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental Health and Wealth of Nations (pp. 274-289). New York: Guilford.
  8. Wang, F. & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23., DOI: 10.1007/BF02504682

Stefano Cacciamani, For a new dialogue between psychology and school: theoretical and methodological issues in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2013, pp. 127-131, DOI:10.3280/RIP2013-01007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content