Click here to download

Unfolding the growing confidence in Latin American unions: a longitudinal analysis
Journal Title: ARGOMENTI 
Author/s: Lorenzo Frangi, Vincenzo Memoli 
Year:  2013 Issue: 38 Language: Italian 
Pages:  22 Pg. 25-46 FullText PDF:  670 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ARG2013-038002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The relevance of unions in labour dynamics has been widely explored. However, little attention has been given to the relationship between society, broadly considered, and unions. Drawing on this perspective, this paper offers a longitudinal analysis (2004-2009) of the social confidence in unions in 17 Latin American (LA) countries. Despite the different union specificities in these countries, we focus on the most important common aspects of these unions, through a historical lens. This analysis allows us to develop some hypotheses about the tenets of the growing level of confidence in unions. We test them through a double-level empirical regression model based on Latin Barometer surveys and national economic indicators. The economic perception and the political and trustful orientations of the citizens play an important role in their confidence orientation towards unions.
Keywords: Unions, trust, confidence, Latin America, latin barometer
Jel Code: J51, J59.

  1. Anderson C.J. and Tverdova Y.T. (2001). Winners, losers and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review, 22: 321-338,, 10.1177/0192512110375938DOI: 10.1177/0192512110375938
  2. Anderson C.J., Blais A., Bowler S., Donovan T. and Listhaug O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  3. Bennet J.T. and Kaufman B.E. (2007a). What do unions do? A twenty years perspective. In Bennet J.T. and Kaufman B.E. (eds.), What do unions do? A twenty years perspective, Transaction Publisher, New Jersey.
  4. Bennet J.T. and Kaufman B.E. (2007b). Historical Insights: the early institutionalists on trade unionism and Labor Policy. In Bennet J.T. and Kaufman B.E. (eds.), What do unions do? A twenty years perspective, Transaction Publisher, New Jersey.
  5. Bergquist C. (1986). Labor in Latin America: Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, and Colombia. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  6. Bronstein A.S. (1995). Societal change and industrial relations in Latin America: trends and prospects. International labor review, 134, 2.
  7. Cella G.P. (1999). Il Sindacato. Laterza, Roma.
  8. Coleman J. (1990). Foundations of Social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  9. Collier R.B. and Collier D. (1991). Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labour movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame IN.
  10. Cook M.L. (2002). Labor Reform and dual transitions in Brazil and the Southern Cone. Latin American Politics and Society, 44, 1: 1-35,, 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2002.tb00195.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2002.tb00195.x
  11. Curini L., Joe W. and Memoli V. (2011). Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 2: 241-261,, 10.1017/S0007123411000275.DOI: 10.1017/S0007123411000275.
  12. Dietz G. (2004). Partnership and development of trust in British Workplaces. Human Resource Management Journal, 14, 1: 5-24,, 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00109.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00109.x
  13. Eckstein S. (2004). Globalization and Mobilization in the Neoliberal Era in Latin America. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology. Boston University.
  14. Ebbinghaus B. and Visser J. (2000). Trade unions in Western Europe since 1945. Macmillan Reference, Grove’s Dictionaries, London and New York.
  15. ECLAC (2000). Social Panorama of Latin America, 1999-2000. Annual report, Santiago del Chile, ECLAC.
  16. ECLAC (2011). Social Panorama of Latin America. Eclac, Santiago del Chile.
  17. Frundt H.J. (2002). Central American Unions in the Era of Globalization. Latin American Research Review, 37, 3: 7-53,, 10.1177/0010414007313119DOI: 10.1177/0010414007313119
  18. Fukuyama F. (1995). Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press, New York.
  19. Gambetta D. (1988). Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  20. Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  21. Givan R. and Hipp, L. (2012). Public Perception of Unoins Efficacy: A Twenty-four country study. Labor Studies Journal, 37, 1: 7-32,, 10.1177/0160449X11429264DOI: 10.1177/0160449X11429264
  22. Hadenius A. (2001). Institutions and democratic citizenship. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  23. Hardin R. (1999). Do we want trust in government? In Warren M.E. (ed), Democracy & Trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  24. Hoell R.C. (2004). The Effect of Interpersonal Trust and Participativeness on Union Member. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 2: 161-177.
  25. Hyman R. (2002). The Future of Unions. Just Labour, 1, 1: 7-15.
  26. IDB (International Development Bank) (2003). Good jobs wanted: labor markets in Latin America. Inter-American development bank and Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington D.C.
  27. ILO (International Labor Organization) (2002). Labour Overview: Latin America and the Carribean. International Labor Organization, Lima.
  28. Kaufman B.E. (2004). Industrial relations in Asia, Africa and Latin America. In Kaufman B.E. (ed), The global evolution of industrial relation, Events, ideas and the IIRA, International Labour Organization, International Labour Office, Ginevra.
  29. Laplante N. and Harrison D. (2008). Les conditions de la confiance entre gestionnaire et représentants syndicaux dans un contexte d’innovations. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 63, 1: 85-107,, 10.7202/018123arDOI: 10.7202/018123ar
  30. Lipset, S. and Schneider W. (1983). The confidence gap: Business, labour and government in the public mind. Free Press, New York.
  31. Lyons B.R. and Mehta J. (1997). Contracts Opportunism and Trust: Self-Interest and Social Orientation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21: 239-257.
  32. Mainwaring S. and Torcal M. (2006). Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. In Katz R.S. and Crotty W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Parties. Sage Publishers, London.
  33. Moehler D.C. (2009). Critical Citizens and Submissive Subjects: Election Losers and Winners in Africa. British Journal of Political Science, 39: 345-366,, 10.1017/S0007123408000513DOI: 10.1017/S0007123408000513
  34. Murillo M.V. (1999). Trends in research on Latin American Labor and Industrial Relations. Latin American Research Review, 34, 1: 237-254.
  35. Murillo M.V. (2005). Partisanship Amidst Convergence: the Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 37, 4: 441-458.
  36. Murillo M.V. and Schrank A. (2010). Labour organizations and their role in the era of political and economic reforms. In Scartascini C., Stein E. and Tommasi E. (eds.), How Democracy Works, Political Institutions, Actors, and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking, Inter-American Development Bank & David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  37. Newton K. and Norris P. (1999). Confidence in Public institutions: faith, culture or performance?. paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political science Association, 1-5 September, Atlanta.
  38. North D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  39. Piore M. and Schrank A. (2006). Trading up? Boston Review, 31, 5: 11-4.
  40. Portes A. and Hoffman K. (2003). Latin America Class Structure: their composition and change during the neoliberal Era. Latin America Research Review, 38, 1: 41-82,, 10.1353/lar.2003.0011DOI: 10.1353/lar.2003.0011
  41. PREALC (1990). Urbanizacion y Sector Informal en America Latina, 1960-1980. PREALC, Santiago.
  42. Putnam R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersy.
  43. Putnam R. (1995a). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6:65-78.
  44. Putnam R. (1995b). Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28, 4: 664-83.
  45. Roberts K: (2002). Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 4: 3-33.
  46. Rouillard J. (2008). Les rapports entre le syndicalisme et l’opinion publique. In Rouillard J. (ed), L’expérience syndicale au Québec. VLB Editeur, Montréal.
  47. Rousseau D.M., Sitkin S.M., Burt R.S. and Camerer C. (1998). Not so Different After All: a Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 123, 3: 393-404.
  48. Schlichter B.R. (2010). Dynamic Trust in Implementation of Large Information Systems: Conceptualized by Features from Giddens’ Theory of Modernity. Systems, Signs & Actions, 4, 1: 1-22.
  49. Schneider B. R. (2009). Hierarchical market economies and Varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin America Studies, 41, 3: 553-575,, 10.1017/S002221X09990186DOI: 10.1017/S002221X09990186
  50. Schneider B. R. and Karcher S. (2010). Inflexibility, informality and other complementarities: the political economy of labour markets in Latin America. Socio-Economic Review, 1-29,, 10.1093/ser/mwq022DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwq022
  51. Smith C. (2005). Understanding Trust and Confidence: Two Paradigms and their Significance for Health and Social Care. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22, 3: 299-316.
  52. Stahler-Sholk R. (1995). The dog that didn’t bark: Labour autonomy and Economic adjustment under the Sandinista and UNO governments. Comparative Politics, 28, 1: 77-102.
  53. Tarrow S. (1996). Making Social Science Work Across and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam’s Making Democracy Work. American Political Science Review, 90, 2: 389-397.
  54. Tonkiss F. and Passey A. (1999). Trust, Confidence and Voluntary Organizations: Better Values and Institutions. Sociology, 33, 2: 257-274,, 10.1177/S0038038599000164DOI: 10.1177/S0038038599000164
  55. Turner L., Katz H.C. and Hurd R.W. (2001). Rekindling the movement. Labour quest for relevance in the 21st century. Cornell University Press, New York.
  56. Turner T. and D’Art D. (2012). Public Perceptions of Trade Unions in Countries of the European Union: A Causal Analysis. Labor Studies Journal, 37, 1: 33-35,, 10.1177/0160449X11429266DOI: 10.1177/0160449X11429266
  57. Uslaner E.M. (1996a ). Faith, Hope, and Charity: Social Capital, Trust, and Collective Action. University of Maryland-College Park manuscript.
  58. Uslaner E.M. (1996b). Trust as Moral Value. Paper prepared for the Conference Social Capital: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, University of Exeter (15-20 September), UK.
  59. Visser J. (2006). Union Membership Statistics in Twenty-Four countries. Monthly Labor Review, 129, 1: 38-49.
  60. Warren M.E. (1999). Democracy & Trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  61. Weyland K. (2007). The political economy of market reform and a revival of market structuralism. Latin American Research Review, 42, 3: 235-250,, 10.1353/lar.2007.0040DOI: 10.1353/lar.2007.0040
  62. Wiarda H. (1976). Politics and social change in Latin America: the distinct tradition. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.
  63. Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  64. Yamigichi T., Yamigichi M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18: 129-66.

Lorenzo Frangi, Vincenzo Memoli, in "ARGOMENTI" 38/2013, pp. 25-46, DOI:10.3280/ARG2013-038002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content