Click here to download

The European Parliament: an historical outline
Journal Title: RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE 
Author/s: Eugenio Salvati 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  21 Pg. 55-75 FullText PDF:  516 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SA2013-003004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The European Parliament (EP). in its actual profile, is the product of the institutional development process which had characterized the progress of the integration process. The EP importance is strictly connected with the kind of relation between EU institutions and EU citizens: only a strong parliament could better perform the representative function and so provide a major legitimacy to the EU institutions. The aim of the article is to understand if the integration process had lead to a highly institutionalized parliament or if it had only empowered the legislative function of the EP, so neglecting the importance of the relation with the base of the representative institution, the citizens-electors.
Keywords: Parliament, european integration, representation

  1. Barbera A. (1999). I Parlamenti. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  2. Bardi L. (1989). Il Parlamento della Comunità Europea: Legittimità e Riforma. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Bartolini S. (2002). Lo stato nazionale e l’integrazione europea: un’agenda di ricerca. Quaderni di Scienza Politica, 9: 397-411.
  4. Bartolini S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring Between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Benz A. and Papadopoulos Y., eds. (2006). Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. Abingdon: Routledge.
  6. Corbett R., Jacobs F. and Shackelton M., eds. (2007). The European Parliament, 7° ed., London: Harper.
  7. Crombez C. (1997). The Co-decision Procedure in the European Union. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22: 97-119.
  8. Fabbrini S. (2002). L’Unione Europea. Le Istituzioni e gli Attori di un Sistema Sovranazionale.
  9. Roma-Bari: Laterza. Follesdal A. and Hix S. (2006). Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44: 533-562,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
  10. Haas E. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  11. Hix S. (2000). Executive Selection in the European Union: Does the Commission President Investiture Procedure Reduce the Democratic Deficit? In: Neunreither K. e Wiener A., eds., European Integration After Amsterdam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Hix S. (2005). The Political System of the European Union. London: Palgrave.
  13. Hix S., Noury A. and Roland G. (2002). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Judge D. and Earnshaw D. (2003). The European Parliament. London: Palgrave.
  15. Kholer Kock B. and Eising R., eds. (1999). The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London-New York: Routledge.
  16. Kreppel A. (2002). The European Parliament and Supranational Party System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Kreppel A. (2009). Le Implicazioni Politiche delle Riforme Istituzionali: le Relazioni tra Esecutivo e Legislativo nell’Unione Europea. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 39: 383-416,, DOI: 10.1426/30990
  18. Magnette P. (2001). Appointing and Censuring the European Commission: the Adaptation of Parliamentary Institutions to the Community Context. European Law Journal, 7: 292-310,, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0386.00131
  19. Majone G. (1998). Europe’s Democratic Deficit: the Question of Standards. European Law Journal, 4: 5-28,, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0386.00040
  20. Moravcsik A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community. A Liberal Intergovernamentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31: 473-524,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x
  21. Norton P. (1990). Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Nugent N. (2006a). Governo e politiche dell’Unione Europea. I Storia e teorie dell’integrazione. Bologna: il Mulino.
  23. Nugent N. (2006 b). Governo e politiche dell’Unione Europea. II Istituzioni e attori politici. Bologna: il Mulino.
  24. Pierson P. (1996). The Path to European Integration: a Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29: 123-163,, DOI: 10.1177/0010414096029002001
  25. Rittberger B. (2005). Building Europe’s Parliament. New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Salvati E. (2013). Rappresentanza oltre lo Stato nazionale: il caso del Parlamento Europeo. Quaderni di Scienza Politica, 20: 255-285, forthcoming.
  27. Scharpf F. (1999). Governare l’Europa. Legittimità democratica ed efficacia delle politiche nell’Unione Europea. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Schmitt H. and Thomassen J. (1999). Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Schmitter P. (2000). Come democratizzare l’Unione Europea e perché. Bologna: il Mulino.
  30. Smith J. (1999). Europe’s Elected Parliament. Trowbridge: Sheffield University Press.
  31. Steunenberg B. (1994). Decision Making under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by European Community. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150: 642-669.
  32. Tsebelis G. (1994). The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter. American Political Science Review, 88: 128-142.
  33. Westlake M. (1994). A Modern Guide to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.
  34. Zielonka J. (2006). Europe as Empire: the Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eugenio Salvati, The European Parliament: an historical outline in "RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE" 3/2013, pp. 55-75, DOI:10.3280/SA2013-003004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content