Click here to download

China and Germany in knowledge-intensive high-tech sectors
Author/s: Alexander Cordes, Birgit Gehrke 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  21 Pg. 5-25 FullText PDF:  318 KB
DOI:  10.3280/POLI2013-004001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

China’s economic development encompasses an improvement of its technological basis and an increasing share in the global trade of high-tech goods. Regarding the velocity of development, though, it is questionable as to the extent to which China has become an equal competitor for developed countries (DC) specialized in R&D-intensive goods. In this paper, we retrace China’s technological catching-up process and attempt to analyze the implications for Germany as one of the largest exporters in this sector. By means of selected indicators of technological input (e.g. publications, FDI purposes) and trade performance (revealed comparative advantage, inter- and intra-industrial trade, unit value) we complement the analysis with a quality dimension. Our results indicate that although China has recently succeeded Germany as the world export leader in high-tech goods, its expansion has not occurred at the cost of Germany’s position. However, this finding is not applicable to the US, which has lost quality advantages relative to both China and Germany, thus indicating that Germany might be a special case in an international comparison.
Keywords: China, Germany, trade, high-tech goods, unit value
Jel Code: F14, O3

  1. Amiti M., Freund C. 2010. The anatomy of China’s export growth, in Feenstra R.C., Wei S.-J. (eds.) China’s Growing Role in World Trade. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  2. Branstetter L., Foley C.F. 2010. Facts and fallacies about US FDI in China, in Feenstra R.C., Wei S.-J. (eds.) China’s Growing Role in World Trade. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  3. Cavallaro E., Mulino M. 2007. Quality upgrading, technological catching up and trade: the case of central and eastern European countries. Paper presented at the ninth annual conference ETSG. Athens, September 13-15.
  4. Freeman C. 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter: London.
  5. Frietsch R., Neuhäusler P., Rothengatter O. 2012. Patent applications. Structures, trends and recent developments. Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem 8.
  6. Gehrke B., Schasse U. 2011. Sektorstrukturen der FuE-Aktivitäten im internationalen Vergleich. Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 80: 89-109.
  7. Gehrke K., Krawczyk O. 2012. Außenhandel mit forschungsintensiven Waren im internationalen Vergleich. Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem 11.
  8. Gornig M., Schiersch A. 2012. German manufacturing withstands the rise of emerging economies. DIW Economic Bulletin, 2 (5): 10-14.
  9. Griliches Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4): 1661-1707.
  10. Grossman G.M., Rossi-Hansberg E. 2008. Trading tasks: a simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review, 98 (5): 1978-1997,, DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1978
  11. Grubel H.G., Lloyd P.J. 1975. Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. Wiley: New York.
  12. Grupp H. 1998. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation. Theory, Measurement and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham.
  13. Hallack J.C., Schott P.K. 2011. Estimating cross-country differences in product quality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (1): 417-474,, DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjq003
  14. Hausmann R., Hwang J., Rodrik D. 2007. What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12 (1): 1-25,, DOI: 10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
  15. Heckman J.J., Yi J. 2012. Human capital, economic growth, and inequality in China. NBER Working Paper 18100.
  16. Lardy N. 2004. China: The Great New Economic Challenge?. Institute for International Economics: Washington.
  17. Legler H., Frietsch R. 2007. Neuabgrenzung der Wissenswirtschaft. Forschungsintensive Industrien und wissensintensive Dienstleistungen (NIW/ISI-Listen 2006). Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem 22.
  18. Linden G., Kraemer K.L., Dedrick J. 2009. Who captures value in a global innovation system? The case of Apple’s ipod. Communications of the ACM, 52 (3): 140-144.
  19. National Science Board. 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012 (NSB 12-01). National Science Foundation: Arlington.
  20. OECD. 2012. Main Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI), 2011/2. OECD: Paris,, DOI: 10.1787/msti-v2011-2-en-fr
  21. Rodrik D. 2006. What’s so special about China’s exports?. China & The World Economy, 14 (5): 1-19,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-124X.2006.00038.x
  22. Schmoch U., Michels C., Schulze N., Neuhäusler P. 2012. Performance and structures of the German science system 2011. Germany in an international comparison, China’s profile, behaviour of German authors, comparison of the web of science and Scopus. Studien zum Deutschen Innovationssystem 9.
  23. Wang Z., Wei S.-J. 2010. What accounts for the rising sophistication of China’s Exports?, in Feenstra R.C., Wei S.-J. (eds.) China’s Growing Role in World Trade. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

Alexander Cordes, Birgit Gehrke, in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 4/2013, pp. 5-25, DOI:10.3280/POLI2013-004001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content