Clicca qui per scaricare

Four theses in frege
Titolo Rivista: PARADIGMI 
Autori/Curatori: Pieranna Garavaso 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2013 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  17 P. 43-59 Dimensione file:  104 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PARA2013-003004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Ci sono quattro tesi di Frege che hanno dato origine a due ampi dibattiti; in ciascuno si asserisce che vi sia un conflitto fra due di queste tesi. In entrambi i dibattiti compare una versione di una di queste tesi chiamato spesso "il principio di Frege". Questo è il Principio di Composizionalità ovvero la tesi che le componenti di un asserto corrispondono alle parti del pensiero da esso espresso. Secondo l’autrice, non c’è stato ancora alcun tentativo di esaminare e discutere queste quattro tesi in connessione tra loro invece che all’interno di due distinti dibattiti. Questo saggio si propone di iniziare questo esame.


Keywords: Analisi alternative, Frege, Principio di Contestualità, Principio di Composizionalità, Linguaggio, Pensiero.

  1. Angelelli I. (1967). Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel,, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3175-
  2. Bell D. (1981). The Place of the “Grundlagen” in Frege’s Development. The Philosophical Quarterly, 31, 124: 209-224,, DOI: 10.2307/221911
  3. Bell D. (1987). Thoughts. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 28: 36-54,, DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/109363684
  4. Bell D. (1996). The Formation of Concepts and the Structure of Thoughts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56: 583-596,, DOI: 10.2307/210838
  5. Bermúdez J.M. (2001). Frege on Thoughts and Their Structure. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 4: 87-105.
  6. Bronzo S. (manuscript). Frege on Multiple Analyses and the Essential Articulatedness of Thought.
  7. Currie G. (1985). The Analysis of Thoughts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 63, 3: 283-298,, DOI: 10.1080/0004840851234189
  8. Dummett M. (1973). Frege. Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
  9. Dummett M. (1975). What is a Theory of Meaning?. In: Guttenplan S., ed. Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 97-138.
  10. Dummett M. (1981). The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
  11. Fodor J., Lepore E. (1992). Holism. A Shopper’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Frege G. (1879). Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Nebert (Engl. tr. by T.W. Bynum: Conceptual Notation. A Formula Language of Pure Thought Modelled upon the Formula Language of Arithmetic, and Related Articles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).
  13. Frege G. (1880-1881). Booles rechnende Logik und die Begriffsschrift. In: Frege G. (1983. I: 9-52) (Engl. tr.: Boole’s Logical Calculus and the Concept-Script. 1979: 9-46).
  14. Frege G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: Koebner (Engl. tr. by J.L. Austin: The Foundations of Arithmetic. A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number. Oxford: Blackwell, 1950) [GL].
  15. Frege G. (1892a). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25-50 (Engl. tr.: On Sense and Meaning. In: Frege G., 1984: 157-177).
  16. Frege G. (1892b). Über Begriff und Gegenstand. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 16: 192-205 (Engl. tr.: On Concept and Object. In: Frege G., 1984: 182-195).
  17. Frege G. (1893-1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet. I, 1893, II, 1903, Jena: Pohle (Engl. tr. by M. Furth: The Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Exposition of the System. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967) [GG].
  18. Frege G. (1899-1906). Über Euklidische Geometrie. In: Frege G. (1983, I: 286-294) (Engl. tr.: On Euclidean Geometry: 167-169).
  19. Frege G. (1906a). Einleitung in die Logik. In: Frege G. (1983, I: 201-212) (Engl. tr.: Introduction to Logic: 185-196).
  20. Frege G. (1906b). Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie. II. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereiningung, 15: 377-403 (Engl. tr. by E.-H.W. Kluge: On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic. Second Series. In: Frege G., 1984: 293-340).
  21. Frege G. (1906c). Kurze Übersicht meiner logischen Lehren. In: Frege G. (1983, I:
  22. 213-218) (Engl. tr.: Brief Survey of my Logical Doctrines: 185-196).
  23. Frege G. (1914). Logik in der Mathematik. In: Frege G. (1983, I: 219-270) (Engl. tr.: Logic in Mathematics: 203-250).
  24. Frege G. (1918-1919). Die Verneinung. Eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I: 143-157 (Engl. tr. by P. Geach and R. Stoothoff: Negation. A Logical Enquiry. In: Frege G. Logical Investigations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977: 31-53).
  25. Frege G. (1919). Aufzeichnungen für Ludwig Darmstaedter. In: Frege G. (1983, I: 273-277) (Engl. tr.: Notes for Ludwig Darmstaedter: 253-257).
  26. Frege G. (1923). Gedankengefüge. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus , III: 36-51 (Engl. tr. by P. Geach and R. Stoohoff: Compound Thoughts. In: Frege G. Logical Investigations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977: 55-77).
  27. Frege G. (1924-1925). Erkenntnisquellen der Mathematik und der mathematischen Naturwissenschaften. In: Frege G. (1983, I: 227-237) (Engl. tr.: Sources of Knowledge of Mathematics and the Mathematical Natural Sciences: 267-274).
  28. Frege G. (1983). Nachgelassene Schriften und wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. Hrsg. von H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach. Hamburg: Meiner (Engl. tr. by P. Long and R. White. Posthumous Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).
  29. Frege G. (1984). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy, ed. by B. McGuinness, Oxford: Blackwell.
  30. Garavaso P. (1991). Frege and the Analysis of Thougths. History and Philosophy of Logic, 12: 195-210,, DOI: 10.1080/01445340910883718
  31. Haaparanta L. (1985). Frege’s Context Principle. Communication and Cognition, 18: 81-94. Heck R.G., May R. (2011). The Composition of Thoughts. Nous, 45, 1: 126-166,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00769.
  32. Hodes H. (1982). The Composition of Fregean Thoughts. Philosophical Studies, 41: 161-178,, DOI: 10.1007/BF0035485
  33. Janssen T.M.V. (2001). Frege, Contextuality and Compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10: 115-136,, DOI: 10.1023/A:102654233222
  34. Kemmerling A. (2011). Thoughts Without Parts. Frege’s Doctrine. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 82, 1: 165-188.
  35. Künne W. (2007). A Dilemma in Frege’s Philosophy of Thought and Language. Rivista di estetica, 34, 1: 95-120.
  36. Milne P. (1986). Frege’s Context Principle. Mind, 95, 380: 481-495.
  37. Pelletier F.J. (2001). Did Frege Believe Frege’s Principle?. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10: 87-114,, DOI: 10.1023/A:102659402329
  38. Penco C. (2003). Frege: Two Theses, Two Senses. History and Philosophy of Logic, 24, 2: 87-109,, DOI: 10.1080/014453403100009615
  39. Resnik M. (1976). Frege’s Context Principle Revisited. In: Schirn M., ed. Studies on Frege. III. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog: 35-49.
  40. Ruffino M.A. (1991). Context Principle, Fruitfulness of Logic and the Cognitive Value of Arithmetic in Frege. History and Philosophy of Logic, 12: 185-194,, DOI: 10.1080/01445340910883718
  41. Stuhlmann-Laeisz R. (2001). The Context-Principle. In: Newen A., Northmann U. and Stuhlmann-Laeisz R., eds. Building on Frege. New Essays on Sense, Content, and Concept. Stanford CA: CSLI: 250-264.
  42. Szabó Z.G. (2012). Compositionality. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compositionality/, last accessed May 20, 2013,, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.000
  43. Textor M. (2009). A Repair of Frege’s Theory of Thoughts. Synthese, 167: 105-123,, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9304-

Pieranna Garavaso, Quattro tesi in Frege in "PARADIGMI" 3/2013, pp. 43-59, DOI:10.3280/PARA2013-003004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche