Click here to download

Republicising the city: spatial practices, cultures and institutions
Journal Title: TERRITORIO 
Author/s: Elena Ostanel, Adriano Cancellieri 
Year:  2014 Issue: 68 Language: Italian 
Pages:  4 Pg. 46-49 FullText PDF:  821 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2014-068007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This article focuses on the relationship between ‘reappropriating’ and ‘republicising’ the urban space by spotlighting its resources and some intrinsic ambivalences, too. On one hand, we analyse how reappropriation practices can interrupt a production of spaces that was taken for granted, thus combating, albeit often unwittingly, the attempts to engender social exclusion and an growing emptiness in public spaces. On the other, we highlight how, in various cases, reappropriation practices succeed in creating not ‘publicness’ but exclusive, excluding or community spaces. The essay analyses a range of issues from the role of cultural enterprise in the regeneration of urban public spaces to the relationship between public space and public sphere and that between spatial practices and institutional powers.
Keywords: Public space; reappropriation; publicness

  1. Agamben G., 1999, Potentialities, Stanford U.P., Stanford.
  2. Bonomi, A. 2013, «Dalla ‘saldatura’ tra cultura e territori la molla per ripartire», Il Sole 24 Ore, 21 luglio.
  3. Brighenti A. Mubi, 2011, «Pubblico e comune: un’approssimazione alla loro articolazione contemporanea», Tecnoscienza, vol. 2, n. 2, pp. 85-101.
  4. Cancellieri A., 2011, «La città e le differenze. Battaglie per il senso del luogo e valorizzazione del welfare space», Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, n.1, pp. 83-91.
  5. Cancellieri A., 2013, Hotel House. Etnografia di un condominio multietnico, Professional Dreamers, Trento.
  6. Donolo C., 1997, L’intelligenza delle istituzioni, Feltrinelli, Milano.
  7. Flusty S., 1994, Building Paranoia: The Proliferation of Interdictory Space and the Erosion of Spatial Justice, West Hollywood, CA.
  8. Gans H. 1995, The War against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy, Basic Books, New York.
  9. Harcourt B.E., 2001, Illusion of Order: The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing, Harvard U.P., Harvard.
  10. La Cecla F., 2000, Perdersi. L’uomo senza ambiente, Laterza, Bari.
  11. Lofland L., 1998, The Public Realm. Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Theory, Aldine Transactions, Chicago.
  12. Lynch K., 1981, A Theory of Good City Form, Mit Press, Cambridge and London.
  13. Mitchell D., 2003, The Right to the City, Guilford Press, New York.
  14. Ostanel E., 2013, «Zone di comfort: lo spazio pubblico nella città della differenza», Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, n.107, pp. 9-29.
  15. Saint-Blancat C. and Cancellieri A., 2014, «From Invisibility to Visibility? The appropriation of public space through a religious ritual. The Filipino procession of Santacruzan in Padua, Italy», Social and Cultural Geography (in print).
  16. Satta C., 2014, «Una città giusta è una città a misura di bambini? Note critiche su un immaginario urbano», Mondi Migranti (in pubblicazione).
  17. Sennett R. 1977, The Fall of Public Man, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  18. Wilson J.Q. and Kelling G.L., 1982, «Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety», Atlantic Monthly, vol. 3, n. 249, pp. 29-38.
  19. Zukin S. 1995, The Cultures of Cities, Blackwell, Cambridge (MA), and Oxford.

Elena Ostanel, Adriano Cancellieri, Republicising the city: spatial practices, cultures and institutions in "TERRITORIO" 68/2014, pp. 46-49, DOI:10.3280/TR2014-068007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content