Click here to download

Inclusive Appropriation and the Double Freedom of Knowledge: on the Capitalist exploitation of non-for profit software, contents and data producers
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Mariano Zukerfeld 
Year:  2014 Issue: 133 Language: English 
Pages:  14 Pg. 145-158 FullText PDF:  878 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2014-133010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


During the last decades, the widespread opposition to the dramatic expansion of intellectual property helped to set a quasi-public sphere of non-commercial digital knowledge. Nevertheless, the flows of "free knowledge" also enabled the development of a (partially) unexplored region of the private and for-profit sphere. A new kind of business methods is being shaped. Somehow, it is based on the disguised exploitation of unpaid digital work, carried out mostly in the leisure time, with non-commercial purposes. This ‘exploitation side’ has only received attention recently. However, the literature still lacks of: i) a name and a definition of the phenomenon, ii) a sound theoretical foundation and iii) an empirical description of its varieties. Thus, this paper tries to shed some light in these three regards by: i) advancing and defining the concept of Inclusive Appropriation (IA); ii) anchoring the IA in the Double Freedom of Knowl-edge (inspired to Marx’s double freedom of labor power) and iii) analyzing three modes of IA, respectively associated with software, contents and data.
Keywords: Inclusive Appropriation, Double Freedom of Knowledge, exploitation, software, business, unpaid digital work

  1. Aa.Vv. (2005), “How do you feel about someone else making money off your content?”, 37signals. Post and 299 comments. Available at: 37signals.com/…/how_do_you_feel_about_someone_else_making_money_off_your _content.php.
  2. Anderson C. (2009) Free: The Future of a Radical Price, Nueva York: Hyperion,, DOI: 10.5860/choice.47-2102
  3. Bauwens M. (2006), “The Political Economy of Peer Production”, Post-autistic economics review, issue n. 37, 28 April 2006, article 3, pp. 33-44, www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue37/Bauwens37.htm.
  4. Benkler Y. (2006), The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Boston: Yale University Press.
  5. Blau J. (2004), “HP claims $2.5B in Linux revenues”, Infoworld. Available at: www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/hp-claims-25b-in-linux-revenues-024.
  6. Boutang Y.M. (1999), “Riqueza, propiedad, libertad y renta en el capitalismo cognitive”, in Rodríguez E., Sánchez R. (eds.), Capitalismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva, Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  7. Carmody T. (2013), “It’s not TV, it’s the Web: YouTube partners complain about Google ads, revenue sharing”, The Verge. Retrieved May 20, 2013.
  8. Cassin B. (2008), Googléame. La segunda misión de Estados Unidos, Fondo de Cultura Económica – Biblioteca Nacional, Buenos Aires.
  9. Castells M. (2006) [1997], La era de la información, Volumen I, La Sociedad Red México DF, Siglo XXI.
  10. Comeau P.A. (2012). “Protection of Personal Information”, in Côté L., Savard J.-F. (eds.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration [online]. Available at: www.dictionnaire.enap.ca.
  11. Delichatsios S.A., Sonuyi T. (2005), “Get to Know Google… Because They Know You”, MIT, Ethics and Law on the Electronic Frontier, 6, 14.
  12. Fake C. (2005), Economies of Interest. In Blog Caterina. Net. Available at: http://www.caterina.net/archive/000863.html.
  13. Fuchs Ch. (2013), “Class and exploitation on the Internet”, in Scholz T. (ed.), Digital labor. The Internet as playground and factory, New York: Routledge. 211-224. Available at: http://fuchs.uti.at/wp-content/CFdigitallabor.pdf.
  14. Gervais D. (2009), “The Tangled Web of User-Generated Content”, 11 Vanderbilt Journal of Technology And Entertainment Law 841.
  15. Gillen A., Waldman B. (2011), Linux in the Mainstream: Growing Deployment of Business-Critical Workloads. IDC White Paper. Available at: www.redhat.com/f/pdf/IDC_Linux_Mainstream.pdf.
  16. Kafka P. (2012), “YouTube’s Gigantic Year Is Already Here, Citi Says”, All things, 6-21-2012. Available at: http://allthingsd.com/20120621/youtubes-gigantic-year-is-already-here-citi-says.
  17. Lazzarato M. (1996), “Inmaterial Labor” en Virno y Hardt (comps) Radical Thought in Italy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  18. Lazzarato M. (2006), Políticas del acontecimiento, Buenos Aires Tinta Limón.
  19. Lazzarato M., Negri A. (2001), Trabajo inmaterial Formas de vida y producción de subjetividad, Río de Janeiro: DP&A Editora.
  20. Marx K. (1996) [1873], El Capital, siglo XXI, México, Tomos I. OCDE (2007), Participative Web: User-Created Content. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/38393115.pdf.
  21. Ostrom E., Hess C. (eds.) (2006), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons:From Theory to Practice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  22. Pasquinelli M. (2010), “The Ideology of Free Culture and the Grammar of Sabotage”, in Araya D., Peters M.A. (eds.), Education in the Creative Economy: Knowledge and Learning in the Age of Innovation, New York: Peter Lang.
  23. Petersen S.M. (2008) “Loser Generated Content: From Participation to Exploitation”, First Monday, vol. 13, n 3,, DOI: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2141.PrivacyInternational(2004),PIfilescomplaintsinsixteencountriesagainstGoogleMail.Availableat:www.privacyinternational.org/press-releases/pi-filescomplaints-in-sixteen-countries-against-google-mail
  24. Reischl G. (2009), El engaño Google. Una potencia mundial sin control en Internet, Sudamericana, Buenos Aires.
  25. Rullani E. (2000), “El capitalismo cognitivo ‘un déjà- vu’”, in Rodríguez E., Sánchez R. (eds.), Capitalismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva, Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  26. Savage C., Wyatt E., Baker P. (June 6, 2013), “U.S. says it gathers online data abroad”, New York Times.
  27. Scholz T. (2013), Digital Labor. The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.
  28. Stumpel M. (2010), The Politics of Social Media. Facebook: Control and Resistance. Master’s Thesis, 2010. New Media MA, University of Amsterdam.
  29. Tapscott D., Williams A. (2005), Wikinomics La nueva economía de las multitudes inteligentes, Barcelona: Paidós Empresa.
  30. Terranova T. (2000), “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy”, Social Text, 18(2).
  31. Van Dijck J., Nieborg D. (2009), “Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos”, New Media Society, 11, p. 855,, DOI: 10.1177/1461444809105356
  32. Vercellone C. (2012), Capitalismo Cognitivo, Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
  33. Vidal M. (2004), “Cooperación sin mando: una introducción al software libre”, in Gradin C. (ed.), Internet, Hackers y Software Libre, Buenos Aires: Editorial Fantasma.
  34. Zizek S. (2003), El sublime objeto de la ideología, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
  35. Zukerfeld M. (2006), “Bienes Informacionales y Capitalismo Cognitivo: Conocimiento, Información y Acceso en el siglo XXI”, Revista Razón y Palabra, n. 54. Revista del Proyecto Internet, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Estado de México. Atizapán de Zaragoza, Estado de México, México.

Mariano Zukerfeld, in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 133/2014, pp. 145-158, DOI:10.3280/SL2014-133010

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content