Clicca qui per scaricare

Doha negotiations on agriculture and future of the WTO multilateral Trade System
Titolo Rivista: QA Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria 
Autori/Curatori: Alan Matthews 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  41 P. 31-71 Dimensione file:  149 KB
DOI:  10.3280/QU2014-001002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The WTO Doha Round of trade negotiations was launched in 2001 and after twelve years of negotiations members seem unable to bring it to a successful conclusion. The agreement on an "early harvest" of deliverables at the 9th WTO Ministerial Conference in Bali in December 2013 may give some renewed momentum, but the prospects for success appear uncertain. This paper describes the stage that the negotiations have reached in agriculture and summarises the most recent draft modalities for agricultural trade liberalisation. It surveys recent estimates of the value of what is currently on the table. It discusses the reasons for the current impasse in the negotiations and asks whether agricultural trade liberalisation would be better served by abandoning the Doha Round. The paper argues that this would not be the case, and concludes by speculating on the minimum conditions necessary to ensure a conclusion to the Round. EconLit Classification: F130, Q170

Sommario l negoziato commerciale del Doha Round del WTO è stato lanciato nel 2001, ma gli sforzi di dodici anni non sono bastati per raggiungere una conclusione positiva. L’accordo "raccolta precoce" di prodotti consegnabili della 9° Conferenza Ministeriale di Bali della WTO, svolta in dicembre 2013, può dare un rinnovato impulso, tuttavia le possibilità di successo paiono incerte. Questo saggio fa il punto sulle trattative svolte finora, offrendo una sintesi delle ultime modalità proposte per la liberalizzazione del commercio agricolo. Sono esaminati i motivi dell’attuale impasse delle trattative fino a chiedersi se, per arrivare prima alla liberalizzazione del commercio agricolo, non sia meglio abbandonare il Doha Round. Tuttavia, questa ipotesi viene respinta, e in conclusione, l’attenzione vien posta sulle condizioni minime necessarie per arrivare alla conclusione del Round
Keywords: WTO, Doha round, Liberalizzazione del commercio agricolo, Conferenza ministeriale di Bali

  1. Anderson K., Martin W., Van der Mensbrugghe D. (2006), «Market and Welfare Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios», Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, World Bank, Washington, Dc., pp. 333-399.
  2. Baldwin R.E. (2006) «Failure of the WTO Ministerial Conference at Cancun: Reasons and Remedies», The World Economy, 29, 6, pp. 677-696.
  3. Baldwin R., Evenett S. (2011), Next Steps: Getting Past the Doha Round Crisis, A VoxEU. org eBook, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
  4. Blustein P. (2009), Misadventures of the Most Favored Nations, Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.
  5. Bouët A., Decreux Y., Fontagné L., Jean S., Laborde D. (2004). «A Consistent, Ad-valorem Equivalent Measure of Applied Protection Across the World: The MAcMap-HS6 Database», CEPII Working Paper, 2004-22, Centre D’Etudes Prospectives et D’Informations Internationales, Paris.
  6. Bouët A. (2008), The Expected Benefits of Trade Liberalization for World Income and Development: Opening the “Black Box” of Global Trade Modeling, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, Dc.
  7. Bouët A., Laborde D. (2010a), Assessing the Potential Cost of a Failed Doha Round, World Trade Review, 9, 2, pp. 319-351.
  8. Bouët A., Laborde D. (2010b), Eight Years of Doha Trade Talks: Where Do We Stand, The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 11, 2, pp. 349-370.
  9. Brandi C., Helble M. (2011), The End of GATT-WTO History? Reflections on the Future of the Post-Doha World Trade Organization, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik gGmbH, Bonn.
  10. Bureau J.-C., Jean S. (2013a), Do Yesterday’s Disciplines Fit Today’s Farm Trade? Challenges and Policy Options for the Bali Ministerial Conference, ICTSD International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Geneva.
  11. Bureau J.-C., Jean S. (2013b), International Agricultural Trade and Negotiations: Coping with a New Landscape, LEI Wageningen UR, The Hague.
  12. Dutt P., Mihov I., Van Zandt T. (2011), Does WTO Matter for the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade?, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
  13. Evenett S.J. (2007), «Reciprocity and the Doha Round Impasse: Lessons for the Near Term and After», Aussenwirtschaft: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen/The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations, 62, 4, p. 391.
  14. Fulponi L., Shearer M., Almeida J. (2011), Regional Trade Agreements-Treatment of Agriculture, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  15. Gallagher K.P. (2007), «Understanding Developing Country Resistance to the Doha Round». Review of International Political Economy, 15, 1, pp. 62-85.
  16. Giordani P., Rocha N., Ruta M. (2012), Food Prices and the Multiplier Effect of Export Policy, Rome: Luiss Lab of European Economics.
  17. Hale T., Held D., Young K. (2013), Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation is Failing When We Need It Most, Polity, London.
  18. Hess S.,Cramon-Taubadel V. (2008), «A Meta-Analysis of General and Partial Equilibrium Simulations of Trade Liberalisation under the Doha Development Agenda», The World Economy, 31, 6, pp. 804-840.
  19. Hoekman B., Martin W., Mattoo A. (2010), «Conclude Doha: It Matters!», World Trade Review, 9, 3, pp. 505-530.
  20. Hoekman B.M. (2013), Re-thinking Economic Development in the WTO, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre, Florence.
  21. Hufbauer G.C., Schott J.J., Wong W.F. (2010), Figuring Out the Doha Round, Peterson Institute, Washington, Dc.
  22. Laborde D., Martin W., van der Mensbrugghe D. (2008), «Implications of the 2008 Doha Draft Agricultural and NAMA Market Access Modalities for Developing Countries», Eleventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Helsinki, 12-14 June, available on line: http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/4037.pdf (last access: August 24, 2013).
  23. Laborde D., Martin W. (2012), «Agricultural Trade: What Matters in the Doha Round?», World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 6261.
  24. Laborde D., Martin W., Van Der Mensbrugghe D. (2012), «Implications of the Doha Market Access Proposals for Developing Countries», World Trade Review, 11, 01, pp. 1-25.
  25. Lamy P. (2011), Chairman’s opening remarks, WTO Trade Negotiations Committee Informal Meeting, Geneva, available on line: http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news11_e/tnc_dg_infstat_29apr11_e.htm (last access: August 22, 2013).
  26. Martin W., Mattoo A. (2010), «The Doha Development Agenda: What’s on the Table?», The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 19, 1, pp. 81-107.
  27. Martin W., Messerlin P. (2007), «Why Is It So difficult? Trade Liberalization under the Doha Agenda», Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23, 3, pp. 347-366. Matthews A. (2012a), «The Impact of WTO Agricultural Trade Rules on Food Security and Development: An Examination of Proposed Additional Flexibilities for Developing Countries», in McMahon J., Desta M. (eds.) Research Handbook On The WTO Agriculture Agreement: New and Emerging Issues in International Agricultural Trade Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, London, pp. 104-132.
  28. Matthews A. (2012b), Trade Agreements, WTO Rules and Food Security. In New Rules of Trade?, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, San Diego, available on line: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/143183 (last access August 24, 2013).
  29. McDougall R.A., Elbehri A., Truong T.P. (1998), Global Trade Assistance and Protection: The GTAP 4 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, available online: http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/v4/v4_doco.asp (last access: February 9, 2014).
  30. Mitra S., Josling T. (2009), Agricultural Export Restrictions: Welfare Implications and Trade Disciplines, International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council (IPC), Washington, Dc.
  31. OECD (2013), Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  32. Orden D., Blandford D., Josling T. (2011), WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support: Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  33. Ostry S. (2000), «The Uruguay Round North-South Grand Bargain: Implications for Future Negotiations», The Political Economy of International Trade Law, pp. 285-300.
  34. Sauvé P. (2013) A Plurilateral Agenda for Services? Assessing the Case for a Trade in Services Agreement, World Trade Institute, Bern.
  35. Schnepf R.D., Hanrahan C. (2010), WTO Doha Round: Implications for US Agriculture, Congressional Research Service, Washington, Dc.
  36. Schwab S.C. (2011), «After Doha: Why the Negotiations Are Doomed and What We Should Do about It», Foreign Affairs, 90, 3, pp. 104-117.
  37. USDA (2013), Agricultural Projections to 2022, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, Dc.
  38. VanGrasstek C. (2013), The History and Future of the World Trade Organization, World Trade Organization, Geneva.
  39. Wise T., Gallagher K. (2009), Is Development Back in the Doha Round?, South Centre, Geneva.
  40. Wolfe R. (2009), «The WTO Single Undertaking as Negotiating Technique and Constitutive Metaphor», Journal of International Economic Law, 12, 4, pp. 835-858.
  41. World Trade Organisation (2008), «Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture», TN/AG/W/4/Rev.4, Geneva.



  1. Dejen Yemane Messele, The Doha Negotiation Deadlock: Implications for the Future of Multilateralism in SSRN Electronic Journal /2017 pp. , DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3089718

Alan Matthews, Il negoziato di Doha sull’agricoltura e sul futuro del Sistema commerciale multilaterale WTO in "QA Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria" 1/2014, pp. 31-71, DOI:10.3280/QU2014-001002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche