Click here to download

Publish or perish. Causes and consequences of a paradigm
Journal Title: ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE  
Author/s: Gloria Origgi, Giovanni B. Ramello, Francesco Silva 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  17 Pg. 9-25 FullText PDF:  66 KB
DOI:  10.3280/POLI2014-004002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The entrance of the market into scholarly publishing has resulted in the emergence of research incentives that approach, in the production model, the traditional business activities. In particular, the norm of the publish or perish that should ensure the production of knowledge, intersects with today commercial strategies that alter the choices of researchers, and, in a sense, the same goals of the research. This paper describes the new forces in play, the changes that have already occurred and the future ones, trying to assess the risks of the new market of academic production for the development of scientific research.
Keywords: Publish or perish, scholarly publishing, journals, bibliometrics
Jel Code: Z11, D83, Z13, L80

  1. Amman R. 2003. A sovietological view of modern Britain. The Political Quarterly, 74 (4): 468-480.
  2. Archambault E., Lariviere V. 2009. History of the journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79 (3): 635-649.
  3. Armstrong M. 2010. Collection sales: good or bad for journals?. Economic Inquiry, 48: 168-178.
  4. Arthur W.B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99 (394): 116-131.
  5. Biagioli M. 2003. Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship, in Biagioli M., Galison P. (eds.) Scientific Authorship. Routledge: New York.
  6. Björk B.C., Roos A., Lauri M. 2009. Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research, published online Bowman N.A., Bastedo M.N. 2011. Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education, 61 (4): 431-444.
  7. Brennan G., Pettit P. 2005. The Economy of Esteem. Princeton University Press:
  8. Princeton. Campbell D.T. 1976. Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation Program and Planning, 2: 67-90.
  9. Carrasco R., Ruiz-Castillo J. 2013. The evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economists. Economic Inquiry, 52 (1): 1-16.
  10. Casati R., Origgi G., Simon J. 2011. Microcredits in scientific publishing. Journal of Documentation, 67 (6): 958-974.
  11. Cavaleri P., Keren M., Ramello G.B., Valli V. 2009. Publishing an e-journal on a shoe string: is it a sustainable project?. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39 (1): 89-101.
  12. Chew M., Villanueva E.V. 2007. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100􀀨(3): 142-150.
  13. Christenson JA., Sigelman L. 1985. Accrediting knowledge: journal stature and citation impact in social science. Social Science Quarterly, 66 (4): 964-975.
  14. Cohen M., Levinthal D.A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128-152.
  15. Davis P.M. 2009. Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation. Learned Publishing, 22 (1): 5-11.
  16. Edlin A.S., Rubinfeld D.L. 2004. Exclusion or efficient pricing? The ‘big deal’ bundling of academic journals. Antitrust Law Journal, 72 (1): 128-159.
  17. Eisenberg T., Wells M.T. 2014. Ranking law journals and the limits of journal citation reports. Economics Inquiry, 52 (4): 1301-1314.
  18. Ewing J. 2011. Mathematical intimidation: driven by the data. Notice of the AMS, 58: 667-673.
  19. Garfield E. 1989. Prestige Versus Impact: Established Images of Journals, Like Institutions, Are Resistant to Change. Essays of an Information Scientist. ISI Press: Philadelphia.
  20. Gladwell M. 2011. The Order of Things.The New Yorker, February 14-21.
  21. Giles C.L., Council I.G. 2004. Who gets acknowledged? Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgement indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101 (51): 17599-17604.
  22. Hirsch J.E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102 (46): 16569-16572.
  23. Huang W. 2014. Do ABCs get more citations than XYZs?. Economic Inquiry, published online,, 10.1111/ecin.12125DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12125
  24. Jinha A.E. 2010. Article 50 millions. An estimate of the numbers of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing,􀀨23􀀨(3): 258-263.
  25. Karpik L. 2011. What is the price of a scientific paper?, in Beckert J., Aspers P. (eds.) The Worth of Goods. Oxford University Press: New York.
  26. Klein D., Chiang E. 2004. Investigating the apparatus: the SSCI, a black box with an ideological bias?. Economic Journal Watch, 1 (1): 134-165.
  27. Lanham R.A. 2006. The Economics of Attention. Chicago University Press: Chicago.
  28. Merton R.K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159 (3810): 56-63.
  29. McCabe M.J., Schnyder C. 2014. Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economics Inquiry, 52 (4): 1284-1300. Merton R.K. 1973. The normative structure of science, in Merton R.K.􀀨The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago University Press: Chicago.
  30. Migheli M., Ramello G.B. 2013. Open access, social norms and publication choice. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35: 149-147.
  31. Migheli M., Ramello G.B. 2014a. Open access journals and academics’ behavior. Economics Inquiry, 52 (4): 1250-1266.
  32. Migheli M., Ramello G.B. 2014b. The market of academic attention, mimeo. Neumann M. 2001. Competition Policy. History, Theory and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham-Northampton.
  33. Nicita A., Ramello G.B. 2007. Property, liability and market power: the antitrust side of copyright. Review of Law and Economics, 3: 767-791.
  34. Park J. H., Qin J. 2007. Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: a grounded theory approach. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 38 (2): 55-84.
  35. Popper K.R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books: New York.
  36. Ramello G.B. 2010. Copyright and endogenous market structure: a glimpse from the journal publishing market. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7 (1): 7–29.
  37. Seglen O. 1997. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314 (7079): 498-513.
  38. Shapin S. 2008. The Scientific Life. Chicago University Press: Chicago.
  39. Triggle C.R., Triggle D.J. 2007. What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Journal of Vascular Health and Risk Management, 3 (1): 39-53.
  40. Willinsky J. 2009. The stratified economics of open access. Economic Analysis & Policy, 39 (1): 53-70.
  41. Ziman J. 2001. Citation gold standard. Nature, 410 (6828): 518-519.

Gloria Origgi, Giovanni B. Ramello, Francesco Silva, Publish or perish. Causes and consequences of a paradigm in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 4/2014, pp. 9-25, DOI:10.3280/POLI2014-004002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content