Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Politiche di Coesione e Pac: una rassegna del dibattito corrente
Titolo Rivista: QA Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria 
Autori/Curatori: Mara Giua 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: 4  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  27 P. 119-145 Dimensione file:  132 KB
DOI:  10.3280/QU2014-004006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Politiche di Coesione e Pac: una rassegna del dibattito corrente In Europa, la Politica di coesione e quella Agricola comune sono molto rilevanti sia in termini finanziari che di distribuzione territoriale delle risorse. Dal punto di vista della definizione e dell’implementazione, il loro percorso è caratterizzato da una forte interdipendenza, che non è adeguatamente considerate in fase di valutazione. Analizzando queste due politiche senza considerarne le loro relazioni, la letteratura esistente lascia ai margini del dibattito fenomeni come l’impatto spaziale delle politiche settoriali e la loro potenziale sinergia. In un contesto di ristrettezza delle risorse, questi due elementi sono invece rilevanti per una crescita sostenibile ed inclusiva (Europa 2020).


Keywords: Europa, Politiche di coesione, Pac, Valutazione delle politiche

  1. Amin A., Thrift N. (2005), Città. Ripensare la dimensione urbana, il Mulino, Bologna.
  2. Armstrong H.W. (2001), European Union Regional Policy, Prentice Hall, Harlow.
  3. Armstrong H.W., Taylor J. (2000), Regional Economics and Policy, Blackwell, Oxford.
  4. Bahr C. (2008), «How Does Sub-National Autonomy Affect the Effectiveness of Structural Funds?», Kyklos, 61, 1, pp. 3-18.
  5. Baldwin R., Wyplosz C. (2009), The Economics of European Integration. Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education, London.
  6. Barca F. (2009), «An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based ap proach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations», Independent Report Prepared at the Request of Danuta Hübner, Brussels.
  7. Barca F., P. McCann, Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012), «The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches», Journal of Regional Science, 52, 1, pp. 134-152.
  8. Baslè M. (2002), «Bonnes gouvernances recherchées et stratégies de connaissance de l’action publique: la place des évaluations», Revue d’économie publique, 10, pp. 118-122.
  9. Batchtler J., Polverari L. (2007), «Delivering Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society», in Faludi A. (ed), Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Ms, pp. 105-128.
  10. Batchtler J., Wren C. (2006), «Evaluation of European Union Cohesion Policy: Research Questions and Policy Challenges», Regional Studies, 40, 2, pp. 143-153.
  11. Becker S.O., Egger P.H., von Ehrlich M. (2010), «Going NUTS: The Effect of EU Structural Funds on Regional Performance», Journal of Public Economics, 94 1-2, pp. 578-590.
  12. Becker S.O., Egger, P.H, von Ehrlich M. (2011), «Absorptive Capacity and the Growth Effects of Regional Transfers: A Regression Discontinuity Design with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects», CEPR Discussion Paper, 8474.
  13. Beugelsdijk M., Eijffinger S. (2005), «The Effectiveness of Structural Policy in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis for the EU-15 in 1995-2001», Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, pp. 37-51.
  14. Bivand R.S., Brundstad R.J. (2003), Regional Growth in Western Europe: An Empirical Exploration of Interactions with Agriculture and Agricultural Policy in Fingleton B. (ed.), European Regional Growth, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 351-373.
  15. Boccaccio M. (2010), Introduzione alla valutazione delle decisioni pubbliche, Giappichelli, Torino.
  16. Bodenstein T., Kemmerling A. (2011), «Ripples in a Rising Tide: Why Some EU Regions Receive More Structural Funds than Others», European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 16, 1 http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2012-001a.htm (last access: September 20 2014).
  17. Boldrin M., Canova F. (2001), «Europe’s Regions. Income Disparities and Regional Policies», Economic Policy, 16, 32, pp. 205-253.
  18. Bondonio D., Greenbaum R. (2006), «Do Business Investment Incentives Promote Employment in Declining Areas? Evidence from EU Objective-2 Regions», European Urban and Regional Studies, 13, pp. 225-244.
  19. Boschma R. (2005), «Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment», Regional Studies, 39, 1, pp. 61-74.
  20. Bouayad-agha S., Turpin N., Védrine L. (2010), «Fostering the Potential Endogenous
  21. Development of European Regions: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Analysis of the Cohesion Policy on Regional Convergence over the Period 1980- 2005», TEPP Working Paper, 17.
  22. Bouvet F. (2005), «European Union Regional Policy: Allocation Determinants and Effects on Regional Economic Growth», mimeo.
  23. Bradley J., Untiedt G. (2007), «Do Economic Models Tell Us Anything Useful about Cohesion Policy Impacts? A Comparison of HERMIN, QUEST and ECOMOD», GEFRA Working Paper, 3, July.
  24. Bradley J., Untiedt G. (2008), «EU Cohesion Policy and “Conditional” Effectiveness: What Do Cross-Section Regression tell us?», GEFRA Working Paper, 4.
  25. Brady M. (2011), «The Impact of CAP Reform on the Environment: Some Regional Results», in Moreddu C. (ed.), Disaggregated Impacts of CAP Reforms: Proceedings of an OECD Workshop, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264097070-15-en, pp. 215-234.
  26. Bureau J.C., Mahè L.P. (2008), «CAP Reform Beyond 2013: An Idea for a Longer View», Notre Europe Studies and Research, 64, Brussels.
  27. Cappelen A., Castellacci F., Fagerberg J., Verspagen B. (2003), «The Impact of EU Regional Support on Growth and Convergence in the European Union», Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, 4, pp. 621-644.
  28. Chatellier V., Guyomard H. (2010), «Le bilan de santé de la Pac en France: une profonde redistribution budgétaire?», OECD Workshop on the Disaggregated Impacts of CAP Reform, March 10-11, Paris.
  29. Checherita-Westphal C., Nickel C., Rother P. (2009), «The Role of Fiscal Transfers for Regional Economic Convergence in Europe», ECB Working Paper, 1029, March.
  30. Commissione europea (1985), Perspectives of the Common Agricultural Policy, COM(85) 333, Brussels.
  31. Commissione europea (1988), The Future of Rural Society, COM (88) 501, Brussels.
  32. Commissione europea (2009), Why Do We Need a Common Agricultural Policy? Discussion Paper DG Agriculture and Rural Development, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-post-2013/reports/why_en.pdf, December (last access: October 15 2014).
  33. Commissione europea (2010a), Europe 2020, A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM(2010) 2020, Brussels.
  34. Commissione europea (2010b), The CAP Towards 2020: Meeting the Food, Natural Resources and Territorial Challenges of the Future. COM (2010) 672, Brussels.
  35. Commissione europea (2011), Council Regualation. Laying Down the Multiannual Financial Framework for the Years 2014-2020. COM (2011) 398, Brussels.
  36. Commissione europea (2013), EU Cohesion Policy Contributing to Employment and Growth in Europe. COM (2013), Brussels.
  37. Commissione europea (2013), The Resource for the Evaluation of Socio-Economic Development – Evaluation Guide. COM (2013), Brussels.
  38. Crescenzi R. (2005), «Innovation and Regional Growth in the Enlarged Europe: The Role of Local Innovative Capabilities, Peripherality and Education», Growth and Change, 36, 4, pp. 471-507.
  39. Crescenzi R. (2009), «Undermining the Principle of Territorial Concentration? EU Regional Policy and the Socio-Economic Disadvantage of European Regions», Regional Studies, 43, 1, pp. 111-133.
  40. Crescenzi R., De Filippis F., Pierangeli F. (2011), «In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union», LEQS â LSE “Europe in Question” Discussion Paper Series, 40, European Institute, London School of Economics (LSE).
  41. Crescenzi R., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2011), «Reconciling Top-Down and Bottom-Up Development Policies», Environment and Planning A, 43(4), 773-780.
  42. Crescenzi R., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012), «Infrastructure and Regional Growth in the European Union», Working Papers Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales, 03.
  43. Cuadrado-Roura J., Garrido-Yserte G., Marcos-Calvo, M. (2004), «Economic and Social Cohesion in the EU: A Critical Approach», ERSA Conference Papers, ersa04p657, European Regional Science Association, Porto, Portugal.
  44. Dall’Erba S., Guillain R., Le Gallo J. (2007), «Impact of Structural Funds on Regional Growth: How to Reconsider a 7 Year-Old Black-Box», The University of Arizona, Discussion Papers, GRD 06-07.
  45. De Benedictis M., De Filippis F., Salvatici L. (1991), «Between Scylla and Charibdys: Agricultural Economists’ Navigation around Protectionism and Free Trade», European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, 18, 3-4, pp. 311-37.
  46. De Filippis F., Salvatici, L. (1999), «L’Italia e la politica agricola del mercato comune europeo», in Bevilacqua P. (a cura di), Storia dell’agricoltura italiana in età contemporanea, volume III, Marsilio, pp. 543-592.
  47. De Filippis F., Storti D. (2002), «Le politiche di sviluppo rurale nell’Unione europea: un-secondo pilastro tutto da inventare», Sviluppo Locale, IX, 19, pp. 43-80.
  48. De Filippis F., Fugaro A. (2005), «La politica di sviluppo rurale tra presente e futuro », Quaderni forum internazionale dell’agricoltura e dell’alimentazione, 5, pp 9-46.
  49. De Filippis F., Sandali P. (2011), «Il bilancio dell’Ue dopo il 2013. Le proposte della Commissione», Quaderno Gruppo 2013, 18, settembre.
  50. De Filippis F., Sandali P. (2013), «La nuova Pac. Un analisi dell’accordo del 26 giugno 2013», Quaderno Gruppo 2013, 21, agosto 2013.
  51. De Filippis F., Henke R., Salvatici L., Sardone R. (2013), «Agricultural Expenditure in the European Union Budget: A Graphical Analysis», European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40, 4, pp. 659-683.
  52. de Freitas M., Pereira F., Torres F. (2003), «Convergence Among EU Regions, 1990-2001. Quality of National Institutions and “Objective 1” Status», Intereconomics, September/October, pp. 270-275.
  53. Demekas D.G., Gupta S., Lipschitz L., Rosenblatt, J., Mayer T.H., Bartholdy, C. (1988), «The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community: Principles and Consequences», IMF Occasional Papers, 62, International Monetary Fund.
  54. Duhr S., Colomb C., Nadin V. (2010), European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, Routledge, London. Ederveen S., Gorter J., de Mooij R., Nahuis R. (2002), «Funds and Games. The Economics of European Cohesion Policy», CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, (occasional paper), The Hague.
  55. Ederveen S., H. de Groot e Nahuis R. (2006), «Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy», Kyklos, 59, pp. 17-42.
  56. ESPON (2004), ESPON Project 2.1.3. The Territorial Impact of CAP and Rural Development Policy, Final Report, August.
  57. Esposti R., Bussoletti S. (2008), «Impact of Objective 1 Funds on Regional Growth Convergence in the European Union: A Panel-Data Approach», Regional Studies, 42, 2, 159-173.
  58. Esposti R. (2007), «Regional Growth and Policies in the European Union: Does the Common Agricultural Policy Have a Counter-Treatment Effect?», American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 1, pp. 116-134.
  59. Eurostat (2007), Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO), NUTS 2003, Luxembourgo.
  60. Fagerberg J., Verspagen B., Caniels M. (1997), «Technology, Growth and Unemployment across European Regions», Regional Studies, 31, 5, pp. 457-466.
  61. Fanfani R., Brasili C. (2003), «La politica di sviluppo rurale nell'Unione europea», Nuovo Diritto Agrario, 1, pp. 37-62.
  62. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A.J. (1999), The Spatial Economy, Cities, Region and International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  63. Gay S.H., Osterburg, B. Baldock D., Zdanowicz A. (2005), «Recent Evolution of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), State of Play and Environmental Potential», MEACAP – WP6 D4b Common Agricultural Policy, http://www.ieep.eu/assets/224/WP6D4B_CAP.pdf, March.
  64. Iammarino S. (2005), «An Evolutionary Integrated View of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Measures and Historical Perspectives», European Planning Studies, 4, 13, pp. 497-519.
  65. Kemmerling A., Bodenstein T. (2006), «Partisan Politics in Regional Redistribution: Do Parties Affect the Distribution of EU Structural Funds Across Regions? », EU Politics, 7, 3, pp. 373-392.
  66. Kilkenny M. (2010), «Urban/Regional Economics and Rural Development», Journal of Regional Science, 50, 1, pp. 449-470.
  67. Krugman P. (1991), «Increasing Returns and Economic Geography», Journal of Political Economy, 99, 3, pp. 483-499.
  68. Ladias A., Stilianos C. (2011), «Optimal Allocation of Investment and Regional Disparities», Regional Science, 0, 2, pp. 45-59.
  69. Leonardi R. (2006), «Cohesion in the European Union», Regional Studies, 40, 2, pp. 155-166.
  70. Magrini S. (1999), «The Evolution of Income Disparities among the Regions of the European Union», Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, pp. 257-281.
  71. Mairate A. (2006), «The “Added Value” of European Union Cohesion Policy», Regional Studies, 40, 2, pp. 167-177.
  72. Mancha-Navarro T., Garrido-Yserte R. (2008), «Regional Policy in the European Union: The Cohesion-Competitiveness Dilemma», Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1, 1, pp. 47-66.
  73. Mantino F. (2013), «La riforma delle politiche di sviluppo rurale 2014-2020», Agriregionieuropa, 9, 35, Dic.
  74. Manzella G.P. (2009), «The Turning Points of EU Cohesion Policy», Report Prepared for the Independent Report by Barca F., An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy.
  75. Martin P. (1999), «Are European Regional Policies Delivering?», EIB Papers, 4, 2, pp. 10-23.
  76. Mattas K., Arfini F., Midmore P., Surry Y., Schmitz M. (2008), «Impacts of CAP Reform on Rural Employment: A Multi-Modeling Cross Country Approach », 109th EAAE Seminar “The CAP after the Fischler Reform: National Implementations, Impact Assessment and Agenda for Future Reforms”, Viterbo, 20-21 November.
  77. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés A. (2011), «Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy», Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB) Working Papers, 14.
  78. Midelfart-Knarvik H., Overman H.G. (2002), «Delocation and European Integration: Is Structural Spending Justified?», Economic Policy, 17, 35, pp. 322-359.
  79. Milio S. (2007), «Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy », Regional Studies, 41, 4, pp. 429-442.
  80. Mohl P., Hagen T. (2008), «Does EU Cohesion Policy Promote Growth? Evidence from Regional Data and Alternative Econometric Approaches», ZEW Discussion Paper, 086.
  81. Mohl P., Hagen T. (2010), «Econometric Evaluation of EU Cohesion Policy – A Survey», ZEW Discussion Paper, 09-052.
  82. Montresor E., Pecci F., Pontarollo N. (2010), «Rural Development Policies at Regional Level in the Enlarged EU. The Impact on Farm Structures», 114th EAAE Seminar “Structural Change in Agriculture”, Berlin, Germany, April 15-16, European Association of Agricultural Economists, 2010.
  83. Morton M. (2009), «Applicability of Impact Evaluation to Cohesion Policy», Report Prepared for the Independent Report by Barca F., An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy.
  84. Ocse (2009), How Regions Grow, Ocse, Paris.
  85. Ocse (2009), Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth, Ocse, Paris.
  86. Pellegrini G., Busillo T., Muccigrosso T., Tarola O., Terribile F. (2013), «Measuring the Impact of the European Regional Policy on Economic Growth: a Regression Discontinuity Design Approach», Paper in Regional Science, 92, 1, pp. 217-233.
  87. Percoco M. (2013), «The Impact of European Cohesion Policy on Regional Growth: How Much Do Strategy and Local Economic Structure Matter?», Bocconi University Working Paper.
  88. Pike A., Rodríguez-Pose A., Tomaney J. (2007), «What Kind of Local and Re gional Development and for Whom?», Regional Studies, 41, 9, pp. 1253-1269.
  89. Puga D. (2002), «European Regional Policies in the Light of Recent Location Theories », Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 4, pp. 373-406.
  90. Rallet A., Torre A. (2007), Quelles proximités pour innover? L’Harmattan, Paris.
  91. Rodríguez-Pose A. (1999), «Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe», Growth and Change, 30, 1, pp. 75-105.
  92. Rodríguez-Pose A., Fratesi, U. (2004), «Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions», Regional Studies, 38, 1, pp. 97-113.
  93. Sapir A., Aghion P., Bertola G., Hellwig M., Pisani-Ferry J., Rosati D., Viñals J., Fallace H. (2004), Europa, un’agenda per la crescita – Rapporto Sapir, il Mulino, Bologna.
  94. Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.P. (2009), «Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress», The Commission: Paris. http://www.stiglitz-sen fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm (last access: 15 September 2014).
  95. Storper M. (1997), The Regional World, Guilford Press, New York.
  96. Shucksmith M., Thomson K., Roberts D. (2005), The CAP and the Regions: The Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy, CAB International Publishing, 2005.
  97. Tarditi S. e Zanias G. (2001), «Common Agricultural Policy, In: Hall, R., A. Smith
  98. and L. Tsoukalis (eds.), Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies», Oxford University Press, 179-215.
  99. Velazquez B.E. (2008), «The Single Payment Scheme in the Impact Assessment of the CAP Heath Check», 109th EAAE Seminar “The CAP after the Fischler Reform:
  100. National Implementations, Impact Assessment and the Agenda for Future Reforms”, Viterbo, Italy, November 20-21.
  101. Wren C. (2005), «Regional Grants: Are They Worth It?», Fiscal Studies, 26, 2, pp. 245-275.
  102. Wren C., Taylor J. (1999), «Industrial Restructuring and Regional Policy», Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 3, pp. 487-516.

Mara Giua, in "QA Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria" 4/2014, pp. 119-145, DOI:10.3280/QU2014-004006

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche