Click here to download

Spatiality, imagery, and the paradox of fictional emotions
Journal Title: PARADIGMI 
Author/s: Andrea Zhok 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  16 Pg. 143-158 FullText PDF:  66 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PARA2014-003010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Object of the paper is the meaning of "reality" and the contribution of imagination to its definition. In the first paragraph, the author asks to which extent the spatial features of imagery can be interpreted as conducive to reality judgments. The question is raised by means of a brief critical account of S. Kosslyn’s view of imagery. In the second paragraph the relations between imagination and reality are discussed in the light of Sartre’s analyses in The Imaginary. This analysis concludes by attaining two complementary definitions of reality. In the third paragraph the previous conceptual clarification is applied to the so-called "paradox of fictional emotions".
Keywords: Phenomenology, imagination, reality, Sartre, spatiality, world.

  1. Davidson D. (1982). Two Paradoxes of Irrationality. In Wollheim R., Hopkins J., eds., Philosophical Essays on Freud, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289-305.
  2. Feagin S. (1996). Reading With Feeling: The Aesthetics of Appreciation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  3. Gendler T.S., Kovakovich K. (2006). Genuine Rational Fictional Emotions. In Kieran M. (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 241-53.
  4. Husserl E. (1973). Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Husserliana II, edited by W. Biemel, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  5. Kosslyn S.M. (1983). Ghosts in the Mind’s Machine. Creating and Using Images in the Brain. London: W.W. Norton and Co.
  6. Kosslyn S.M., Thompson W.L., Ganis G. (2006). The Case for Mental Imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Moran R. (1994). The Expression of Feeling in Imagination. Philosophical Review, 103(1): 75-106.
  8. Noë A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
  9. Paskow A. (2004). The Paradoxes of Art: A Phenomenological Investigation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  10. Sartre J.-P. (1958). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Methuen.
  11. Sartre J.-P. (2004). The Imaginary. A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. London: Routledge.
  12. Schaper E. (1978). Fiction and the Suspension of Disbelief. British Journal of Aesthetics, 18: 31-44.
  13. Thompson E. (2007). Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  14. Walton K. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.8763

Andrea Zhok, in "PARADIGMI" 3/2014, pp. 143-158, DOI:10.3280/PARA2014-003010


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content