Click here to download

Revenge, Ambition, Thought. Reflections on Hamlet and Macbeth
Journal Title: PARADIGMI 
Author/s: Laura Talarico 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  8 Pg. 13-20 FullText PDF:  48 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PARA2015-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The article starts from a reflection on the canonicity of Hamlet and Macbeth and on the possible inhibition of new interpretations this can cause. It then goes on to highlight some similarities between the two tragedies, which make them suitable for a joint reading. At the centre of both we find characters that have become "myths" of modernity. They moreover epitomize two fundamental types of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama, revenge tragedy and ambition tragedy, which are in fact complementary. At the same time, Hamlet and Macbeth explode these paradigms, particularly by exposing their paradoxical temporality. Finally, these plays question any pre-established pattern thanks to their protagonists’ exceptional and exceeding ability to "think". Hamlet and Macbeth thus seem to call for a contrastive and multi-perspective reading which, aware of its own limitations, may enable us to overcome the impasse mentioned at the beginning.
Keywords: Ambition, Hamlet, Macbeth, Revenge, Shakespeare, Tragedy.

  1. Bates J. A. and Wilson R., eds. (2014). Shakespeare and Continental Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  2. Bevington D. (2011). Murder Most Foul: Hamlet through the Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press,, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599103.001.000
  3. Bloom H., ed. (2010). William Shakespeare: Tragedies. New York: Bloom’s Modern Critical Views, Infobase Publishing.
  4. Bradley A. C. (1904). Shakespearean Tragedy. London: Macmillan, 1962 (trad. it.: La tragedia di Shakespeare. Storia, personaggi, analisi. Milano: Rizzoli, 2007).
  5. Cavell S. (1979). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Cavell S. (1987). Disowning Knowledge: In Six Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press; nuova edizione: Disowning Knowledge: In Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003,, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139165129(trad.it.:Ilripudi
  7. del sapere. Lo scetticismo nel teatro di Shakespeare. Torino: Einaudi, 2004).
  8. Cavell S. (2000). Foreword. In: Joughin (2000): x-xiv.
  9. Colombo R. and Fusini N., eds. (2014). Memoria di Shakespeare. A Journal of Shakespearean Studies, 1 (Thinking with Shakespeare), ojs.uniroma1./index. php/MemShakespeare,, DOI: 10.13133/2283-875
  10. Cutrofello A. (2010). Continental Philosophy. New York-London: Routledge.
  11. Cutrofello A. (2014). All for Nothing: Hamlet’s Negativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Dillon J. (2007). The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Foakes R. A. (2002). The Critical Reception of Shakespeare’s Tragedies. In: McEachern (2002): 224-40.
  14. Frye N. (1967). Fools of Time. Studies in Shakespearean Tragedy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (trad. it. in: Tempo che opprime, tempo che redime. Riflessioni sul teatro di Shakespeare. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1986).
  15. Frye N. (1983). The Myth of Deliverance. Reflections on Shakespeare’s Problem Plays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (trad. it. in: Tempo che opprime, tempo che redime. Riflessioni sul teatro di Shakespeare. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1986).
  16. Greenblatt S. (1980). Renaissance Self-fashioning. From More to Shakespeare. London: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Greenblatt S. (2001). Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: Princeton University Press (trad. it.: Amleto in Purgatorio. Roma: Carocci, 2002).
  18. Joughin J. J., ed. (2000). Philosophical Shakespeares. London-New York: Routledge,, DOI: 10.4324/978020340038
  19. Kottman P. A., ed. (2009). Philosophers on Shakespeare. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  20. Lombardo A. (1992). Strehler e Shakespeare. Roma: Bulzoni.
  21. Mack M. (1993). Everybody’s Shakespeare: Reflections Chiefly on the Tragedies.
  22. Lincoln-New York: University of Nebraska Press. McEachern C., ed. (2002). The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Tragedy. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Nuttall A. D. (2007). Shakespeare the Thinker. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
  24. Pascucci M. (2013). Philosophical Readings of Shakespeare: “Thou Art the Thing Itself”. New York: Palgrave Macmillan,, DOI: 10.1057/978113732458
  25. Saval P. K. (2014). Reading Shakespeare through Philosophy. New York-London: Routledge.
  26. Schulman A. (2014). Rethinking Shakespeare’s Political Philosophy: From Lear to Leviathan. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Critical Studies in Shakespeare and Philosophy, Edinburgh University Press.
  27. Shakespeare W. (1951). Macbeth, ed. Muir K. London: The Arden Shakespeare, Methuen (trad. it.: Macbeth, a cura di Lombardo A., con testo a fronte. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1997).
  28. Shakespeare W. (1995). Amleto, a cura di Lombardo A., con testo a fronte. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  29. Shakespeare W. (1997a). Amleto, a cura di Serpieri A., con testo a fronte. Venezia: Marsilio.
  30. Shakespeare W. (1997b). Il primo Amleto, a cura di Serpieri A., con testo a fronte. Venezia: Marsilio.
  31. Shakespeare W. (2006a). Hamlet, eds. Thompson A. and Taylor N. London: The Arden Shakespeare, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  32. Shakespeare W. (2006b). Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623, eds. Thompson A. and Taylor N. London: The Arden Shakespeare, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  33. Shakespeare W. (2015). Macbeth, eds. Clark S. and Mason P. London: The Arden Shakespeare, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  34. Stewart S. (2010). Shakespeare and Philosophy. New York-London: Routledge.
  35. Taylor G. (2014). Macbeth and Middleton. In: Shakespeare W. (2014). Macbeth, ed. Miola R. S. London-New York: W.W. Norton & Company: 296-305.
  36. Twain M. (1884). The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, ed. Coveney P. London: Penguin, 1985.
  37. Watson R. N. (2002). Tragedies of Revenge and Ambition. In: McEachern (2002): 160-81.
  38. Zamir T. (2007). Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Laura Talarico, Revenge, Ambition, Thought. Reflections on Hamlet and Macbeth in "PARADIGMI" 1/2015, pp. 13-20, DOI:10.3280/PARA2015-001002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content